On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 08:48:07AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 09/05/2011 08:44 AM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> > So, I guess what I'm asking is, is it ok to give +1 to any/all
> > packages if they work at all/we don't notice any regressions, or do we
> > have to actually test what they are suppo
#238: proventester request - jstanley
-+--
Reporter: jstanley | Owner:
Type: proventester request | Status: new
Priority: major| Milestone:
C
On 09/05/2011 08:44 AM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> So, I guess what I'm asking is, is it ok to give +1 to any/all
> packages if they work at all/we don't notice any regressions, or do we
> have to actually test what they are supposed to fix? Thanks.
It is ok to +1 if you don't notice any regressions
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 10:57:12PM +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> Tom Horsley gmail.com> writes:
>
> > I also note that I still have to use --skip-broken
> > due to a load of stuff involving gnome control
> > panel and evolution-data-server and wot-not. Seems
> > like those problems have been the
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 05:34:43PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-09-04 at 23:01 +0200, Karsten Hopp wrote:
> > Hi !
> >
> >
> > I'd call it a failure when a security update for a critical path package
> > gets stuck in
> > -updates-testing for 6 weeks. I'm talking about the F14 l
On 09/05/2011 02:31 AM, Karsten Hopp wrote:
> Hi !
>
>
> I'd call it a failure when a security update for a critical path package gets
> stuck in
> -updates-testing for 6 weeks. I'm talking about the F14 libcap update, where
> only one
> proventester cared to test the updated package and commen
On 09/05/2011 08:06 AM, Ruch G wrote:
> Does sushi have a .deb file so I can install it in ubuntu?
>
> I tri-boot my computer
>
Try asking in the Ubuntu mailing list. This is off topic here. Also
quote only as much as necessary
Rahul
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsub
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Bruce Cowan wrote:
> On 4 September 2011 06:50, Joachim Backes
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > since about 2 days the nautilus sound preview fails: traversing sound
> files
> > with the mouse pointer will highlight the icons, but will not play them.
> >
> > Anybody has t
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-09-04 at 23:01 +0200, Karsten Hopp wrote:
>> Hi !
>>
>>
>> I'd call it a failure when a security update for a critical path package
>> gets stuck in
>> -updates-testing for 6 weeks. I'm talking about the F14 libcap update, wher
On Sun, 2011-09-04 at 23:01 +0200, Karsten Hopp wrote:
> Hi !
>
>
> I'd call it a failure when a security update for a critical path package gets
> stuck in
> -updates-testing for 6 weeks. I'm talking about the F14 libcap update, where
> only one
> proventester cared to test the updated packa
Tom Horsley gmail.com> writes:
> I also note that I still have to use --skip-broken
> due to a load of stuff involving gnome control
> panel and evolution-data-server and wot-not. Seems
> like those problems have been there forever as well.
kiilerix on #fedora-qa pointed out that you can work ar
On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 22:29:58 + (UTC)
Andre Robatino wrote:
> Any reason for the lack of recent F16 pushes?
I also note that I still have to use --skip-broken
due to a load of stuff involving gnome control
panel and evolution-data-server and wot-not. Seems
like those problems have been there fo
Any reason for the lack of recent F16 pushes? The last one was
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2011-September/102433.html which
was 3 days ago. The grub2-1.99-1.fc16 "time bomb" (see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735259 ) is just sitting in
updates-testing. It would be r
Hi !
I'd call it a failure when a security update for a critical path package gets
stuck in
-updates-testing for 6 weeks. I'm talking about the F14 libcap update, where
only one
proventester cared to test the updated package and commented on it.
Sure, it is only a minor security issue, but sh
On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 10:31:21 +0200
Thomas Spura wrote:
> Some i686 updates make it to the broken deps for x86_64, others
> don't...
>
> Why that?
This is multilib. Basically packages that have a -devel subpackage have
that devel subpackage and it's requirements (if available) shipped in
the 64bi
Compose started at Sun Sep 4 13:15:51 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires
libnetsnmpagent.so.25()(64bit)
389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires
libnetsnmpmibs.so.25()(64bit)
Compose started at Sun Sep 4 08:15:02 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosgViewer.so.74()(64bit)
FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosgUtil.so.74()(64bit)
FlightGear
On 4 September 2011 06:50, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since about 2 days the nautilus sound preview fails: traversing sound files
> with the mouse pointer will highlight the icons, but will not play them.
>
> Anybody has this problem too?
That has been removed in favour of Sushi. You need to
On Sat, 3 Sep 2011 12:37:37 +
Rawhide Report wrote:
> Broken deps for x86_64
> --
> FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires
> libosgViewer.so.74()(64bit) FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires
> libosgUtil.so.74()(64bit) FlightGear-
19 matches
Mail list logo
