Hey, folks. Just wanted to post a quick summary of where we stand with
Beta. Obviously, we need to get the TC2 validation testing completed. We
also need to check all the bugs that ought to be fixed in TC2 and verify
that they indeed are, so we can get those bugs off the blocker list. All
of these
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 19:44 -0700, Rob Healey wrote:
> Greetings:
>
>
> I updated my computer from fc16/ updates-testing up to fc17 today!
> After that, I have been receiving this message...
>
>
> Installing :
> gnome-shell-extension-common-3.1.4-3.20110830git6b5e3a3e.fc17.noarch
>
Greetings:
I updated my computer from fc16/ updates-testing up to fc17 today! After
that, I have been receiving this message...
Installing :
gnome-shell-extension-common-3.1.4-3.20110830git6b5e3a3e.fc17.noarch
1/4
Installing :
gnome-shell-extension-auto-move-wind
On 09/09/11 08:22 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 18:54 -0600, Dariusz J. Garbowski wrote:
>
>> Sadly, tracker affected my interest in Solang... Why do I need another
>> search tool on my system?
>> Already have locate. KDE comes with it's own stuff (which I disable by
>> defau
#237: tests to verify that torrents and mirrors contain signed checksum files
---+
Reporter: robatino | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: Wi
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 18:54 -0600, Dariusz J. Garbowski wrote:
> Sadly, tracker affected my interest in Solang... Why do I need another search
> tool on my system?
> Already have locate. KDE comes with it's own stuff (which I disable by
> default). Now another one
> sneaks in...
tracker is a
On 09/09/11 10:29 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Sep 2011 13:13:25 +0200, me wrote:
>
>> 6) Tracker (apart from having crashed) started to appear at the top of "top"
>> with heavy CPU usage. I hope that won't go on like that.
>
> To fight that, I've stopped the mining, then used
>
> yu
The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/phpMyAdmin-3.4.4-1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ecryptfs-utils-90-2.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-5.3.8-1.fc14,maniadrive-1.2-32.fc14,php-eaccelerator-0.9.
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/seamonkey-2.3.3-1.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/zabbix-1.8.7-1.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/phpMyAdmin-3.4.4-1.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/
On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 10:08 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> I'm nearly sure it wasn't.
>
> There have been two xserver updates between the 2011-05-11 snapshot and
> now. In a quick review of the changes in that interval I can only find
> one change that looks even remotely like a performance improv
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 14:25:33 -0700,
Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> In the present situation - the update really needs to go out, and the
> bug fixes have been verified on F15 - yes.
>
> As I said before, it's a bit fuzzy (partly because Bodhi numeric karma
> really isn't sufficient to our purp
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 14:08 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 12:25:55 -0700,
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Hey, folks. Can anyone with a working mdraid array on F16 please
> > up-karma this update:
> >
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-9952
> >
> > i
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 19:39 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:37:03 -0700, AW (Adam) wrote:
>
> > > 5) Haven't had any display corruption recently, but slowness as well
> > > as
> > > missing/delayed refreshes are still there. Typing this mail in Emacs
> > > leaves copies of
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 19:31 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Sep 2011 17:39:32 +0100, PR (Peter) wrote:
>
> > >> 6) Tracker (apart from having crashed) started to appear at the top of
> > >> "top"
> > >> with heavy CPU usage. I hope that won't go on like that.
> > >
> > > To fight that,
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 13:10 -0400, Dan Scott wrote:
> Tested the TC2 amd64 LiveCD briefly this morning on a Lenovo T400 with
> Intel 915 graphics card, iwlagn wifi, and 8GB of RAM.
>
> 1. Initial boot (default mode): plymouth started, then screen turned
> black with the top left corner of the scre
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 13:37 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Debugging options are going to be turned off for the next builds
> > in time for the beta.
>
> Was debugging on in 3.0.1-3 ? For me, that kernel performs (graphically)
> significantly better than any 3.1 kernel. I haven't tried 3.0.1-5
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 15:46 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 12:07:48PM -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
>
> > Below are 4 kernels that I have tested to see what works ok and what
> > don't. The 2 3.0 kernels both were extremely slow, and the 2 2.6.40
> > kernels were both faster
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 11:37 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 09:25 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 02:31 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 13:39 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 16:32 -0400, Tom Horsley wrot
#232: Virtualization Test Day
---+
Reporter: jforbes | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 16
Component: Test Day | Version:
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 12:07:48PM -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
> Below are 4 kernels that I have tested to see what works ok and what
> don't. The 2 3.0 kernels both were extremely slow, and the 2 2.6.40
> kernels were both faster and more responsive. Using the latest 2.6.40
> does still hav
===
#fedora-bugzappers: F16-Beta_blocker_review
===
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-09-09/f16-beta_blocker_review.2011-09-09-17.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.o
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 12:25:55 -0700,
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hey, folks. Can anyone with a working mdraid array on F16 please
> up-karma this update:
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-9952
>
> if you have an Intel BIOS RAID array (but not other BIOS RAID arrays,
> whi
Hey, folks. Can anyone with a working mdraid array on F16 please
up-karma this update:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-9952
if you have an Intel BIOS RAID array (but not other BIOS RAID arrays,
which are handled by dmraid, not mdraid), or a Linux software RAID
array, on an F16
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 12:07:48 -0500, MC (Mike) wrote:
> > > Okay, different bug then. What graphics card?
> >
> > Radeon HD 4350. Using a 2.6.40 kernel (might try a 3.0 kernel that is
> > lil older) helps speed it up a whole lot.
>
>
> Below are 4 kernels that I have tested to see what works ok
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:37:03 -0700, AW (Adam) wrote:
> > 5) Haven't had any display corruption recently, but slowness as well
> > as
> > missing/delayed refreshes are still there. Typing this mail in Emacs
> > leaves copies of the cursor block above characters until a delayed
> > refresh clears th
On Fri, 9 Sep 2011 17:39:32 +0100, PR (Peter) wrote:
> >> 6) Tracker (apart from having crashed) started to appear at the top of
> >> "top"
> >> with heavy CPU usage. I hope that won't go on like that.
> >
> > To fight that, I've stopped the mining, then used
> >
> > yum -y install tracker-sear
Tested the TC2 amd64 LiveCD briefly this morning on a Lenovo T400 with
Intel 915 graphics card, iwlagn wifi, and 8GB of RAM.
1. Initial boot (default mode): plymouth started, then screen turned
black with the top left corner of the screen turning gray and white.
System didn't respond to CTRL-ALT-F
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 11:37 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 09:25 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 02:31 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 13:39 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 16:32 -0400, Tom Horsley wrot
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 10:30 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
> See email sent previous to this, but changing to a 2.6.40 (did a
> f15-->f16 yum upgrade) that was used from my F15 system seems to make it
> run lot faster now. Not sure if the rendering part is all fixed or not,
> but nowhere near as slo
mrpt-gui-0.9.4-0.1.20110110svn2383.fc15.i686 requires libopencv_ml.so.2.2
mrpt-gui-0.9.4-0.1.20110110svn2383.fc15.i686 requires
libopencv_legacy.so.2.2
mrpt-gui-0.9.4-0.1.20110110svn2383.fc15.i686 requires
libopencv_contrib.so.2.2
mrpt-gui-0.9.4-0.1.20110110svn2383.fc15.i68
==
The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
==
Still broken compared with F-16+updates:
61 builds
Fixed packages compared with F-16+updates:
Default install completed without complaints.
I did not trust Anaconda to get the MCR right,
so let Ubuntu update the master grub.
I had to bring up the network manually to get the initial
setup script to work.
--
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R c...@omen.com www.omen.com
Developer of Industr
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Sep 2011 13:13:25 +0200, me wrote:
>
>> 6) Tracker (apart from having crashed) started to appear at the top of "top"
>> with heavy CPU usage. I hope that won't go on like that.
>
> To fight that, I've stopped the mining, then used
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 09:25 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 02:31 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 13:39 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 16:32 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 12:28:26 -0700
> > > > Adam Willi
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 09:28 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 11:50 +0200, Jurgen Kramer wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 11:57 -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
> > > Who's ready for some pre-betaTC2 installer testing fun?
> > >
> > > I built a custom boot.iso that could use some testin
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 13:13 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> 5) Haven't had any display corruption recently, but slowness as well
> as
> missing/delayed refreshes are still there. Typing this mail in Emacs
> leaves copies of the cursor block above characters until a delayed
> refresh clears them
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 13:42 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Oh, and more breakage:
>
> # q
> bash: q: command not found...
> Failed to search for file: Process /lib64/dbus-1/dbus-daemon-launch-helper
> received signal 11
That's http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736880 .
--
Adam Willi
On Fri, 9 Sep 2011 13:13:25 +0200, me wrote:
> 6) Tracker (apart from having crashed) started to appear at the top of "top"
> with heavy CPU usage. I hope that won't go on like that.
To fight that, I've stopped the mining, then used
yum -y install tracker-search-tool
to install two more trac
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 11:50 +0200, Jurgen Kramer wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 11:57 -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
> > Who's ready for some pre-betaTC2 installer testing fun?
> >
> > I built a custom boot.iso that could use some testing and karma before
> > we kick off the F16 Beta TC2 (hopefully later
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 10:15 +0200, Matthias Runge wrote:
> Looking at the bug report[1] knurd mentioned, I'll try a kernel 2.6.40
> to see, what happens.
2.6.40 is just 3.0 with the versioning munged for backwards
compatibility. If you want to start from a 'known-more-or-less-good'
base kernel ve
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 02:31 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 13:39 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 16:32 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> > > On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 12:28:26 -0700
> > > Adam Williamson wrote:
> > >
> > > > That's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 02:31 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 13:39 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 16:32 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> > > On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 12:28:26 -0700
> > > Adam Williamson wrote:
> > >
> > > > That's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 10:15 +0200, Matthias Runge wrote:
> I didn't intend to run this on a daily basis whining about 5% loss,
> hooraying for each win. I just tried to get nearer to this problem.
> I'm pretty sure, nearly nobody would notice 10% deviation.
>
> Looking at the bug report[1] knurd
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/seamonkey-2.3.3-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/stunnel-4.42-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ecryptfs-utils-90-2.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates
Compose started at Fri Sep 9 08:15:07 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicuuc.so.46
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicui18n.so.46
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 require
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/09/2011 07:42 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 07:28:17 -0400, DJW (Daniel) wrote:
>
>>> 3) NFS file locking service fails to start. I haven't messed
>>> with it at all. The recent update (marked stable meanwhile with
>>> 0 karm
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 13:42 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> Oh, and more breakage:
>
> # q
> bash: q: command not found...
> Failed to search for file: Process /lib64/dbus-1/dbus-daemon-launch-helper
> received signal 11
I have a fix for that, see the latest PackageKit build in
f16-updates-
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 07:28:17 -0400, DJW (Daniel) wrote:
> > 3) NFS file locking service fails to start. I haven't messed with
> > it at all. The recent update (marked stable meanwhile with 0 karma)
> > mentions enabling it by default. It also mentions SELinux issues,
> > but then it should NOT be
Compose started at Fri Sep 9 08:15:35 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
acheck-0.5.1-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(Text::Aspell)
airrac-0.1.0-2.fc16.i686 requires libstdair.so.0.36
airrac-0.1.0-2.fc16.i686 requires lib
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/09/2011 07:13 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> The list of what today's Yum update installed is below.
>
> 1) "Removable devices" icon at the bottom in GNOME Shell. It lists
> my LUKS /home partition as removable. Left-clicking it obviously
> doesn
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:59:59 +0200, JB (Joachim) wrote:
> On 09/09/2011 09:12 AM, Christoph Frieben wrote:
> > 2011/9/9 Joachim Backes:
> >> After running yum update (Sep 08), no gnome-session is stable: each time
> >> I login, the gnome session is immediateliy killed ("Oh, no. Something
> >> has
The list of what today's Yum update installed is below.
1) "Removable devices" icon at the bottom in GNOME Shell. It lists my
LUKS /home partition as removable. Left-clicking it obviously doesn't manage
to eject it, but doesn't complain either. Right-clicking it gives the
additional option to "Ope
On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 11:57 -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
> Who's ready for some pre-betaTC2 installer testing fun?
>
> I built a custom boot.iso that could use some testing and karma before
> we kick off the F16 Beta TC2 (hopefully later today). If you have the
> time, please give these a spin:
>
> ht
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/09/11 16:08, Adam Jackson wrote:
>
> I'm nearly sure it wasn't.
>
> There have been two xserver updates between the 2011-05-11 snapshot
> and now. In a quick review of the changes in that interval I can
> only find one change that looks even r
On 09/09/2011 09:12 AM, Christoph Frieben wrote:
> 2011/9/9 Joachim Backes:
>> After running yum update (Sep 08), no gnome-session is stable: each time
>> I login, the gnome session is immediateliy killed ("Oh, no. Something
>> has gone wrong").
>
> Updating to the latest bunch of packages of GNOM
On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 13:39 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 16:32 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> > On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 12:28:26 -0700
> > Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > > That's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720605 , which is
> > > being worked on, and has workarou
2011/9/9 Joachim Backes:
> After running yum update (Sep 08), no gnome-session is stable: each time
> I login, the gnome session is immediateliy killed ("Oh, no. Something
> has gone wrong").
Updating to the latest bunch of packages of GNOME 3.1.91 resolves this issue. ~C
--
test mailing list
tes
After running yum update (Sep 08), no gnome-session is stable: each time
I login, the gnome session is immediateliy killed ("Oh, no. Something
has gone wrong").
I could get rid from this behaviour by downgrading (the updated)
glib2-2.29.90-1 to version glib2-2.29.18-1.fc16
Anybody sees this too?
58 matches
Mail list logo
