On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 11:05 -0500, Petr Schindler wrote:
>
>> > We made this Beta not Alpha in the criteria on purpose, specifically
>> > because we don't think it's a significant enough problem if the lives
>> > are over-size at Alpha stag
On 01/31/2012 09:00 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 11:43 -0500, Chris Lumens wrote:
"The installed system must run normally if the user chooses to install without
SELinux"
There is no test case for this now.
I have one note on this. There is used noselinux option, but it doe
On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 02:38 +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > Installation fails at partitioning stage, with udisksd hitting "Error
> > opening /etc/crypttab file: Failed to open file '/etc/crypttab': No such
> > file or directory (g-file-error-quark, 4)"
> >
> > The file /etc/crypttab indeed doesn't
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> That's an implementation detail. It's not a capability-driven
>> description of which packages should actually be in the minimal package
>> set, as was discussed earlier in the thread.
>
> Merely stating that if you're linking to what the
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 14:23 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 14:10 +0100, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> > Hello Testers and rawhide Users,
> >
> > Fedora 17 will locate the entire base operating system in /usr. The
> > directories
> > /bin, /sbin, /lib, /lib64 will only be symlinks:
On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 14:10 +0100, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> Hello Testers and rawhide Users,
>
> Fedora 17 will locate the entire base operating system in /usr. The
> directories
> /bin, /sbin, /lib, /lib64 will only be symlinks:
> /bin → /usr/bin
> /sbin → /usr/sbin
> /lib → /usr/lib
> /lib64 →
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-1077/wicd-1.7.0-11.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0888/curl-7.21.3-13.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0939/moodle-1.9.16-1.fc15
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-1059/wicd-1.7.0-10.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0913/moodle-2.0.7-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0921/znc-0.204-3.fc16
On 31/01/12 20:25, Adam Williamson wrote:
Has anyone else who's done the /usr move tried to install a kernel after
the move? If so, does it work, or do you hit the same problem Tom hit?
I ran into the same problem,
but after seeing Tom's post held off reporting.
Will check more guests in the
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 09:26 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 10:44 -0500, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> > >> Also, the problem is in your initramfs, not the kernel itself.
>> > >>
>> > >> Harald?
>> > >
>> > > I was about to foll
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 10:44 -0500, Tom H wrote:
>
>> >> Also, the problem is in your initramfs, not the kernel itself.
>> >>
>> >> Harald?
>> >
>> > I was about to follow up. I tried rebuilding the rc6 kernel's
>> > initramfs but there was
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 09:26 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 10:44 -0500, Tom H wrote:
>
> > >> Also, the problem is in your initramfs, not the kernel itself.
> > >>
> > >> Harald?
> > >
> > > I was about to follow up. I tried rebuilding the rc6 kernel's
> > > initramfs but th
On 01/30/2012 10:38 PM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
you forgot to convert with dracut before yum upgrade... right??
Yes, my bad.
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA, Boulder Office FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane or..
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 11:42 -0500, Chris Lumens wrote:
> > "The installer must be able to handle the failure and report the issue. The
> > installer must be also able to access debug mode."
>
> Debug mode is intended to be used by developers to test and fix
> anaconda. I don't think this belongs
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 11:43 -0500, Chris Lumens wrote:
> > "The installed system must run normally if the user chooses to install
> > without SELinux"
> >
> > There is no test case for this now.
> >
> > I have one note on this. There is used noselinux option, but it doesn't
> > work now. I fill
Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) said:
> On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 10:52 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Petr Schindler (pschi...@redhat.com) said:
> > > > Yeah. As far as QA is concerned, the key questions are 'is there a
> > > > minimal package set present, does an install with that package
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 10:52 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Petr Schindler (pschi...@redhat.com) said:
> > > Yeah. As far as QA is concerned, the key questions are 'is there a
> > > minimal package set present, does an install with that package set
> > > complete properly, does it boot'. What's *i
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 10:52 -0500, Petr Schindler wrote:
> > From: "Adam Williamson"
> > To: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases"
> >
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 4:51:56 AM
> > Subject: Re: New criterion for installation with minimal set of packages
> >
> > On Mon, 201
> "The installer must be able to handle the failure and report the issue. The
> installer must be also able to access debug mode."
Debug mode is intended to be used by developers to test and fix
anaconda. I don't think this belongs in test criteria.
- Chris
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedo
> "The installed system must run normally if the user chooses to install
> without SELinux"
>
> There is no test case for this now.
>
> I have one note on this. There is used noselinux option, but it doesn't work
> now. I filled bug [2] there is another option with the same effect -
> selinux=
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 07:15 -0500, Petr Schindler wrote:
> > > Especially saving failures to disk is important for installation
> > > without net access. There are test cases [1], [2] and [3] for
> > > testing this feature.
> > >
> > > [1]
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 11:05 -0500, Petr Schindler wrote:
> > We made this Beta not Alpha in the criteria on purpose, specifically
> > because we don't think it's a significant enough problem if the lives
> > are over-size at Alpha stage. It *may* be worth requiring at least
> > the
> > DVD to meet
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 09:52 -0500, Petr Schindler wrote:
> > Similar to previous:
> >
> > "The installer must be able to retrieve and use an
> > [[Anaconda/Updates|
> > installer update image]] by any supported method"
> >
> > Though this may be too broad, and we may have the problem we had with
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 07:48 -0500, Petr Schindler wrote:
> OK, so test case should stay in alpha and new criterion should be in
> alpha too. I propose to drop the part about embedded checksum (that
> would be only additional check) and new criterion should be:
>
> "A correct checksum must be publ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
On 01/31/2012 06:31 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> We have Fedora 17 Alpha TC1 scheduled to be composed today. I think
> it may be best to go ahead and spin TC1 without the /usr move
> changes, so we have - hopefully - a functional baseline fo
Hey, folks. Just wanted to keep the lines of communication open about
our results testing the /usr move feature.
On upgrading existing Rawhide installs: we have multiple reports of
people who have been able to do so successfully following the
instructions given by Harald in the post 'Fedora 17’s u
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 10:44 -0500, Tom H wrote:
> >> Also, the problem is in your initramfs, not the kernel itself.
> >>
> >> Harald?
> >
> > I was about to follow up. I tried rebuilding the rc6 kernel's
> > initramfs but there was no joy. I then managed to boot with the rc6
> > kernel using the r
Petr Schindler (pschi...@redhat.com) said:
> > Yeah. As far as QA is concerned, the key questions are 'is there a
> > minimal package set present, does an install with that package set
> > complete properly, does it boot'. What's *in* it is not really our
> > concern.
>
> So new beta criteria sho
> From: "Adam Williamson"
> To: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 1:52:49 AM
> Subject: Re: Change of release level of Mediakit ISO Size test case
>
> On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 20:40 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> > Petr Schindler redhat.com
> From: "Adam Williamson"
> To: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 4:51:56 AM
> Subject: Re: New criterion for installation with minimal set of packages
>
> On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 21:56 -0500, Jon Stanley wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 8:30 AM, Tom H wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 3:47 AM, Tom H wrote:
>>>
>>> I noticed late Sunday night that I was booting after the usrmove
>>> procedure from a pre-usrmove kernel. When I tried to boot from a
>>> ke
> From: "Adam Williamson"
> To: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 1:42:30 AM
> Subject: Re: New criterion for updates.img using
>
> On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 11:28 -0500, Petr Schindler wrote:
> > I propose new beta criterion:
> >
> > "The i
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 3:47 AM, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> I noticed late Sunday night that I was booting after the usrmove
>> procedure from a pre-usrmove kernel. When I tried to boot from a
>> kernel updated from the f17-usrmove repository (3.3.0-0.
> From: "Adam Williamson"
> To: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 1:51:16 AM
> Subject: Re: New criterion for Checksum
>
> On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 18:02 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> > Petr Schindler redhat.com> writes:
> >
> > > I propo
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 3:47 AM, Tom H wrote:
> I noticed late Sunday night that I was booting after the usrmove
> procedure from a pre-usrmove kernel. When I tried to boot from a
> kernel updated from the f17-usrmove repository (3.3.0-0.git4.1.fc17),
> I got:
>
> "/bin/sh: error while loading sha
> From: "Adam Williamson"
> To: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 1:50:46 AM
> Subject: Re: New test case for testing if services start properly
>
> On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 11:37 -0500, Petr Schindler wrote:
> > I propose new test cases [1]
> From: "Adam Williamson"
> To: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 1:47:55 AM
> Subject: Re: Proposal for enhancement of criterion
>
> On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 11:35 -0500, Petr Schindler wrote:
> > I propose to enhance alpha criterion
> >
>
> From: "Adam Williamson"
> To: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 1:46:45 AM
> Subject: Re: New criterion for reporting failure of installer and accessing
> debug mode
>
> On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 11:29 -0500, Petr Schindler wrote:
> > I
> From: "Adam Williamson"
> To: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 1:36:38 AM
> Subject: Re: New criterion for Memory test
>
> On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 11:23 -0500, Petr Schindler wrote:
> > I propose new final criterion:
> >
> > "The instal
Hi,
thank you for the suggestions, as with the live.iso testcases, I'll just
continue in this particular thread, since both DVD testcases are 'the same'.
I've updated the testcases [1][2], so they contain the standard 'proceed with
installation' steps, and the final 'boots without usb stick plug
Thanks, Adam,
as these are all 'the same', I'll just continue in this particular thread. I've
updated the testcases [1][2][3], to cover the installation procedure. The
testcase(s) now look like this:
---
How to test
Insert the USB stick containing Live.iso, and bo
I noticed late Sunday night that I was booting after the usrmove
procedure from a pre-usrmove kernel. When I tried to boot from a
kernel updated from the f17-usrmove repository (3.3.0-0.git4.1.fc17),
I got:
"/bin/sh: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open
shared object file:
42 matches
Mail list logo
