Some errors from package install in F17

In general, install went very well. Of the several thousand packages I installed, these were the only errors. I was really impressed. These packages had dependency errors during dependency resolution: Packages skipped because of dependency problems: bootconf-1.4-5.fc17.noarch from fedora

Re: F17 vs. Pentium 4

On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Josh Boyer wrote: On Mar 29, 2012 9:34 PM, "Michael Hennebry" wrote: On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Felix Miata wrote: If you want NX for your existing motherboard you'd probably have to find a Prescott 478, which may never have existed, and even if it does, might not be support

Re: [Fedora QA] #288: Kdump

#288: Kdump ---+--- Reporter: ccui | Owner: hongqing Type: task | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 17 Component: Test Day |Version: Resolution: fixed | Keywords: Blocked By:|

Re: F17 vs. Pentium 4

On 03/29/2012 11:08 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 20:34 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote: On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Felix Miata wrote: If you want NX for your existing motherboard you'd probably have to find a Prescott 478, which may never have existed, and even if it does, might no

Re: F17 vs. Pentium 4

On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 20:34 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote: > On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Felix Miata wrote: > > > If you want NX for your existing motherboard you'd probably have to find a > > Prescott 478, which may never have existed, and even if it does, might not > > be > > supported by your BIOS

Re: F17 vs. Pentium 4

On Mar 29, 2012 9:34 PM, "Michael Hennebry" wrote: > > On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Felix Miata wrote: > >> If you want NX for your existing motherboard you'd probably have to find a Prescott 478, which may never have existed, and even if it does, might not be supported by your BIOS or any available upgra

Re: F17 vs. Pentium 4

On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Felix Miata wrote: If you want NX for your existing motherboard you'd probably have to find a Prescott 478, which may never have existed, and even if it does, might not be supported by your BIOS or any available upgrade for it. I'm not looking for NX. I only mentioned it

Re: F17 vs. Pentium 4

On 2012/03/29 17:29 (GMT-0500) Michael Hennebry composed: On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Felix Miata wrote: Stepping doesn't say anything useful without family& model for context. I'm looking at two different Hyperthreading P4 cpuinfo screens ATM, stepping of 3 on one, 5 on the other, but one is mo

Re: F17 vs. Pentium 4

On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Felix Miata wrote: On 2012/03/29 14:30 (GMT-0500) Michael Hennebry composed: Stephen John Smoogen wrote: What kind of Pentium IV. There were several versions and also multiple motherboards all of which will affect whether this question can be answered. Stepping 9.

Re: built-in DVD mediacheck is gone

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 05:08:22PM +, Andre Robatino wrote: > Actually, yes. Optical drives on different machines can easily be different > enough that a disc that's readable on one (such as the one it was burned on) > may > not be readable on another. I've seen this on two of my machines

Re: F17 vs. Pentium 4

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:25:46 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote: Has F17 been tested to see whether it will install on a Pentium 4? Recently I installed F15 because I could not get the F16 installer to boot. I can get the F13, F14 and F15 installers to boot without media. The F16 installer was

[Test-Announce] 2012-03-30 @ 17:00 UTC - F17 Beta Blocker Bug Review #4

# F17 Beta Blocker Review meeting #4 # Date: 2012-03-30 # Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT) # Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net Since F17 beta has officially slipped a week, we're having another beta blocker bug review meeting! The fourth (and hopefully final) F17 beta bl

Re: F17 vs. Pentium 4

On 2012/03/29 14:30 (GMT-0500) Michael Hennebry composed: Stephen John Smoogen wrote: What kind of Pentium IV. There were several versions and also multiple motherboards all of which will affect whether this question can be answered. Stepping 9. Stepping doesn't say anything useful wi

[Test-Announce] F17 Beta to slip by one week.

At the Go/No-Go meeting it was decided to slip the Beta by one week[1]. Minutes follow below. Despite valiant efforts by many awesome people, two new blockers appeared between RC1 and RC2, for which fixes are still incoming and will require the creation of an RC3 [2]. As a result, ALL MAJOR

Re: F17 vs. Pentium 4

On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On 29 March 2012 11:25, Michael Hennebry wrote: Has F17 been tested to see whether it will install on a Pentium 4? Recently I installed F15 because I could not get the F16 installer to boot. I can get the F13, F14 and F15 installers to boot with

Re: Network unstable in F17 after latest NetworkManager updates

On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 18:13:15 +0200, JB (Joachim) wrote: > On 03/29/2012 05:59 PM, Patrick Dubois wrote: > > Joachim, > > > > What's your network card? I'm curious to see if I can reproduce the issue. > > Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168B PCI > Express Gigabit Et

Re: curious: yum-presto prevents from updating in F17 by yum?

On 03/29/2012 07:39 PM, mwesten wrote: > On 03/29/2012 12:21 PM, Joachim Backes wrote: >> Hi, >> >> somebody has seen this too: "yum update" fails: >> >> --- snip - >> Traceback (most recent call last): >>File "/bin/yum", line 29, in >

Re: curious: yum-presto prevents from updating in F17 by yum?

On 03/29/2012 12:21 PM, Joachim Backes wrote: Hi, somebody has seen this too: "yum update" fails: --- snip - Traceback (most recent call last): File "/bin/yum", line 29, in yummain.user_main(sys.argv[1:], exit_code=True) Fil

Re: F17 vs. Pentium 4

On 29 March 2012 11:25, Michael Hennebry wrote: > Has F17 been tested to see whether it will install on a Pentium 4? > Recently I installed F15 because I could not get the F16 installer to boot. > I can get the F13, F14 and F15 installers to boot without media. > The F16 installer was a no go, bot

F17 vs. Pentium 4

Has F17 been tested to see whether it will install on a Pentium 4? Recently I installed F15 because I could not get the F16 installer to boot. I can get the F13, F14 and F15 installers to boot without media. The F16 installer was a no go, both without media and with a minimal CD. In both cases, I

built-in DVD mediacheck is gone

Al Dunsmuir sympatico.ca> writes: > > Hell, we could make it the default and have a 'nocheck' parameter? > > Sounds painful on DVD media - more minutes of my life that I'm not > going to get back. > > You are forgetting the scenario where one creates install media, and > uses it on mult

[Test-Announce] Announcing 389 Directory Server version 1.2.10.4 Stable

The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of 389-ds-base-1.2.10.4. This release contains a fix for a bug that causes the directory server to hang when using compare operations with virtual attributes. No new features were added after alpha 8, just many bug fixes. There are also

curious: yum-presto prevents from updating in F17 by yum?

Hi, somebody has seen this too: "yum update" fails: --- snip - sudo yum update --exclude=NetworkManager* Loaded plugins: langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit Setting up Update Process Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check

Re: Network unstable in F17 after latest NetworkManager updates

On 03/29/2012 05:59 PM, Patrick Dubois wrote: > Joachim, > > What's your network card? I'm curious to see if I can reproduce the issue. Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller (rev 01) > > Also, how often does the network go aw

Network unstable in F17 after latest NetworkManager updates

Hi, after applying the latest updates of NetworkManager NetworkManager.x86_64 1:0.9.4.0-1.git20120328.fc17 NetworkManager-glib.x86_64 1:0.9.4.0-1.git20120328.fc17 NetworkManager-gnome.x86_64 1:0.9.4.0-1.git20120328.fc17 NetworkManager-gtk.x86_64 1:0.9.4.0-1.git20120328.fc17 the network becomes u

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 17 Beta Release Candidate 2 (RC2) Available Now!

I did an liveinst of beta rc2 desktop using the --no-memcheck option and things worked. I'll be filing two bugs though. There is a udev rule warning that displays during the boot process that I think we don't want for final. Also I saw messages in the logs for first boot that indicated it was runn

Re: built-in DVD mediacheck is gone

On Wednesday, March 28, 2012, 11:16:09 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 20:11 -0700, Brian C. Lane wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 11:50:34PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> > On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 23:02 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> > > On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 05:47 +, An

Re: Morte Noveau still there.

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 03:10:24 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: Installed Wednesday's fc17 via pxeboot. Install went normally except for quadracially downloading from a Fedora server instead of honoring my "askmethod" request. "askmethod" has gone away. -- test mailing list tes

F-17 Branched report: 20120329 changes

Compose started at Thu Mar 29 08:15:09 UTC 2012 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [HippoDraw] HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.i686 requires python-numarray HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.x86_64 requires python-numarray HippoDraw-

Morte Noveau still there.

Installed Wednesday's fc17 via pxeboot. Install went normally except for quadracially downloading from a Fedora server instead of honoring my "askmethod" request. As before, the system went into the catatonic mode after several minutes' typical activities. The clock stopped running. No respon

built-in DVD mediacheck is gone

Adam Williamson redhat.com> writes: > > If you pass 'check' on the cmdline dracut will run a mediacheck. We may > > want to add a menu option for that under Troubleshooting. > > Hell, we could make it the default and have a 'nocheck' parameter? Or maybe the 'check' option is okay, and the boot

built-in DVD mediacheck is gone

Adam Williamson redhat.com> writes: > On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 20:11 -0700, Brian C. Lane wrote: > > If you pass 'check' on the cmdline dracut will run a mediacheck. We may > > want to add a menu option for that under Troubleshooting. > > Hell, we could make it the default and have a 'nocheck' par

Re: Python-3.3.0 ...

On Mar 29, 2012 8:18 AM, "Rob Healey" wrote: > > Greetings All: > > Here is something that I got directly off from this site [1], and it is exciting news! > > Release Schedule > > The current schedule is: > > 3.3.0 alpha 1: March 3, 2012 > 3.3.0 alpha 2: March 31, 2012 > 3.3.0 alpha 3: April 28, 2

Python-3.3.0 ...

Greetings All: Here is something that I got directly off from this site [1], and it is exciting news! Release Schedule The current schedule is: - 3.3.0 alpha 1: March 3, 2012 - 3.3.0 alpha 2: March 31, 2012 - 3.3.0 alpha 3: April 28, 2012 -