On 2012/04/02 17:06 (GMT-0700) Adam Williamson composed:
the problem with doing a default network install is you get packages
from updates-testing...I did several minimal installs of Beta RC2 and
saw nothing like this.
I did it all over, except unchecked the updates-testing source box. Didn't
On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 20:01 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> As reported earlier in thread "Unable to read package metadata", I tried
> starting installation using Grub and kept failing. So I tried the boot ISO
> from http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/development/17/i386/os/images/. That
> enabled a G
The dhcpd problem was an invalid bug report. The named issue, however, is a
switch from initscripts to systemd, so I think it just needs an update to the
upgrading with yum wiki page.
Jik
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 2, 2012, at 7:35 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 23:25 +
As reported earlier in thread "Unable to read package metadata", I tried
starting installation using Grub and kept failing. So I tried the boot ISO
from http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/development/17/i386/os/images/. That
enabled a GUI minimal install (on only 512M RAM, shared with video, but w
On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 23:25 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 04/02/2012 07:55 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Hum, that seems to be true. It seems to be systemd in both 16 and 17. So
> > I'm not sure why its default status would change on upgrade, unless
> > there's a bad script in the pac
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-5256/wireshark-1.4.12-1.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-4308/libtasn1-2.12-1.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-4268/taglib-1.7.1-
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-4342/libtasn1-2.12-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-4291/taglib-1.7.1-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-5078/drupal7-ctools-1.
On 04/02/2012 07:55 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hum, that seems to be true. It seems to be systemd in both 16 and 17. So
I'm not sure why its default status would change on upgrade, unless
there's a bad script in the package.
If this was a legacy sysv init script in F16 but got migrated to nativ
On Mon, 2 Apr 2012, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 11:30:47AM -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Sun, 1 Apr 2012, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
>
>AFAIK 'askmethod' is no longer valid. Use repo=...
Arrrg. Syntax!!!
kernel /isolinux17/vmlinuz repo=hd:LABEL=/home1:/iso
On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 11:24 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> On 4/2/2012 3:38 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-04-01 at 00:16 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> > > After the upgrade, both named.service and dhcpd.service were disabled
> > > in systemd, even though they were both enabled pri
On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 12:55 -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Apr 2012 14:35:58 -0400
> Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>
> > Can I suggest https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808152 as
> > well.
>
> We're talking over IRC but for the record, proposing bugs as a blocker
> or "NTH" can be
On Mon, 2 Apr 2012 14:35:58 -0400
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> Can I suggest https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808152 as
> well.
We're talking over IRC but for the record, proposing bugs as a blocker
or "NTH" can be done by adding the respective tracker bug to the
"blocks" field.
Th
On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 12:49 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> Does HTTP installation from
> http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/development/17/i386/os/isolinux/ kernel &
> initrd ever result in Anaconda able to read package metadata? I tried again
> just now after failing yesterday several times, and alw
[corrected typo]
I just installed 32 bit to 2.8GHz 1024 cache family 15 model 3 stepping 4
without NX on i915 using
http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/development/17/i386/os/images/boot.iso
Since yesterday I'd been trying to start install from HD using this Grub stanza:
title Install Rawhide (hd0,
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 09:57:23AM -0700, Robyn Bergeron wrote:
> Please join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-1 for this
> important meeting. This will be Round 2 of this meeting for the Beta
> release of F17.
>
> Wednesday, April 4, 2012 @21:00 UTC (17:00 EDT/14:00 PDT)
>
> "Before eac
I just installed 32 bit to 2.8GHz 1024 cache family 15 model 3 stepping 4
without NX on i915 using
http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/development/17/i386/os/images/boot.iso
Since yesterday I'd been trying to start install from HD using this Grub stanza:
title Install Rawhide (hd0,13)
kernel
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 11:30:47AM -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Apr 2012, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> >
> >AFAIK 'askmethod' is no longer valid. Use repo=...
>
> Arrrg. Syntax!!!
>
> kernel /isolinux17/vmlinuz repo=hd:LABEL=/home1:/iso17/
> good?
I really do not know i
On Mon, 2 Apr 2012, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Here is the grub stanza I used this time:
title Install Fedora17 from iso
root (hd0,2)
pause have rooted (hd0,2)
find /isolinux17/vmlinuz
pause have finded
kernel /isolinux17/vmlinuz kernel /isolinux17/vmlinuz
repo=h
On Mon, 2 Apr 2012, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Sun, 1 Apr 2012, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 10:05:50PM -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
This approximately what I'd been trying to do.
This is what I'd been using to try to boot F17-alpha:
title Install Fedora17 from iso
Please join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-1 for this
important meeting. This will be Round 2 of this meeting for the Beta
release of F17.
Wednesday, April 4, 2012 @21:00 UTC (17:00 EDT/14:00 PDT)
"Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet
to determine
Does HTTP installation from
http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/development/17/i386/os/isolinux/ kernel &
initrd ever result in Anaconda able to read package metadata? I tried again
just now after failing yesterday several times, and always get halted with
"Unable to read package metadata" after d
On Sun, 1 Apr 2012, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 10:05:50PM -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
This approximately what I'd been trying to do.
This is what I'd been using to try to boot F17-alpha:
title Install Fedora17 from iso
root (hd0,2)
find /isolinux17/vm
On 4/2/2012 3:38 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2012-04-01 at 00:16 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
After the upgrade, both named.service and dhcpd.service were disabled
in systemd, even though they were both enabled prior to the upgrade.
Perhaps this is because named and dhcpd were switched t
On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 12:26 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 18:40:46 +0200,
>Joachim Backes wrote:
> >On 03/31/2012 05:17 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> >> I found the code used. It is in the accountsservices package, not gdm as
> >> expected.
> >>
> >> There is a list of
On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 09:57 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> It looks like they aren't checking /etc/shells. I couldn't find the code
> they use to build the list. They do appear to be black listing /sbin/nologin.
> There are a few accounts that don't have /sbin/nologin as a shell, but
> don't s
Compose started at Mon Apr 2 08:15:13 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[HippoDraw]
HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.i686 requires python-numarray
HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.x86_64 requires python-numarray
HippoDraw-
#291: Proposed Test Day - JBoss Application Server
---+---
Reporter: goldmann | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 17
Component: Test Day |Version:
Resolution:| Keywords:
#291: Proposed Test Day - JBoss Application Server
--+
Reporter: goldmann | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 17
Component: Test Day | Version:
Keywords:| Blocked By:
x27;ll be doing some review and RC3 planning. Also, we
didn't get to the 'QA as a sub-project' topic last week, so let's sign
off on it this week.
This is a reminder of the upcoming QA meeting. Please add any topic
suggestions to the meeting wiki page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wik
On 01/04/12 04:11, Rob Healey wrote:
Good evening:
When will ATK-2.4 be available please?
Hi Rob,
Have you thought about installing\upgrading to Fedora-17,
which is currently being put through it's testing phases.
I'm saying this as you have recently asked for a lot
of "When can we have x,y,
On Sun, 2012-04-01 at 00:16 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I just upgraded my system from Fedora 16 to Fedora 17 using yum as
> described at
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum. Here are my
> notes from the experience. I'm not really sure which of these to
On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 21:33 -0600, ajsfedora wrote:
> Fedora 17
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=435
>
> On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 20:11 -0700, Rob Healey wrote:
> > Good evening:
> >
> > When will ATK-2.4 be available please?
To expand: f16 is a stable release. We don't
32 matches
Mail list logo
