#393: Revise release criteria for ARM as primary arch
---+---
Reporter: adamwill | Owner: adamwill
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 20
Component: Release
#394: Revise validation process / templates for ARM as primary arch
---+---
Reporter: adamwill | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 20
Component: Wiki |Version:
Resolution:
On Mon, 22 Jul 2013, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
I filed another defect about the same package because one of its dialogs
provided several pieces of incorrect information about a particular
configuration setting and how to change it. He responded, Oh, that screen
is wrong, we don't actually use that
On 07/23/2013 11:43 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
There is at least one objective test that can be made:
Someone should try to repoduce the problem from your bug report.
Cannot do it myself. Cannot get past F14.
ABRT bugs are often intermittent. As I noted in an earlier email message
in this
On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 15:05 -0400, Fernando Cassia wrote:
It seems to me like you don't know how to report bugs. Bug reports
should include STEPS TO REPRODUCE, ALWAYS, it is not OPTIONAL.
[voice=droll]
So is is your stated position that intermittent or hard to reproduce
bugs are 'someone
On 07/23/2013 04:00 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Are all the bugs under discussion ABRT bugs?
All of the bugs which prompted me to start this thread on the test list
fall into one of two categories: reproducible bugs where reproduction
steps were provided, and ABRT bugs.
There are no bugs in
On Tue, 23 Jul 2013, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
On 07/23/2013 04:00 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Are all the bugs under discussion ABRT bugs?
All of the bugs which prompted me to start this thread on the test list fall
into one of two categories: reproducible bugs where reproduction steps were
On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 07:32 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
A working mechanism to create a user account must be clearly presented
during installation and/or first boot of the installed system.
A system installed with a release-blocking desktop must boot to a log in
screen where it is
Hi,
It seems that you've all gone on vacation, happy campers. :)
Are we going to upgrade, it's been almost a month since you released
NetworkManager-0.9.9.0-5.git20130603.fc20, and moreover it is faulty, in
the least i686.
I managed to build and drive nicely 0.9.10.0-1.git20130723.fc20.
Fedora
Hi,
Apparently repo doesn't like it a lot. ;)
€ dnf install gnome-documents gnome-photos
Setting up Install Process
Resolving Dependencies
-- Starting dependency resolution
-- Finished dependency resolution
Error: nothing provides gnome-online-miners needed by
gnome-documents-3.9.4-1.fc20.i686
On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 01:59 +0200, poma wrote:
Hi,
Apparently repo doesn't like it a lot. ;)
It's fixed in today's Rawhide, should sync to mirrors tomorrow I guess.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 01:40 +0200, poma wrote:
Hi,
It seems that you've all gone on vacation, happy campers. :)
Are we going to upgrade, it's been almost a month since you released
NetworkManager-0.9.9.0-5.git20130603.fc20, and moreover it is faulty, in
the least i686.
I managed to build
12 matches
Mail list logo
