The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
90
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19262/quassel-0.9.1-1.fc19
83
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19963/openstack-glance-2013.1.4-1.fc19
28
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FED
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
91
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19198/quassel-0.9.1-1.fc20
52
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-22130/chicken-4.8.0.5-1.fc20
37
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-2
On 2014-01-16 15:59, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:56:16AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 10:07 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
>
> This, for a change, leaves you with an asorted leftover files lying
> around.
Only if the package's manifest changed bet
On 01/16/2014 02:19 PM, Dan Mossor wrote:
Chris, the error was narrowed down to
selinux-policy-targeted-3.12.1-116. See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054350
selinux was denying rpm access, but wasn't logging it for some reason. I
saw no output in any of the logs while reprodu
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:56:16AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 10:07 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> >
> > This, for a change, leaves you with an asorted leftover files lying
> > around.
>
> Only if the package's manifest changed between the versions being
> upgraded '
Hi,
Can you help me to get up-to-date instruction how to create Fedora (19 or
20) install ISO? The following documentation
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_a_Fedora_install_ISO_for_testing is
not topical for these releases.
Thank you in advance.
--
Vyacheslav Sarzhan
--
test mailin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/16/2014 04:09 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Jan 16, 2014, at 11:57 AM, Michael Schwendt
> wrote:
>
Is this with SELinux enforcing/permissive/disabled? Do you get any
AVC denied messages in the logs?
>>>
>>> For me, yes and no.
>>>
On Jan 16, 2014, at 11:57 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>>> Is this with SELinux enforcing/permissive/disabled?
>>> Do you get any AVC denied messages in the logs?
>>
>> For me, yes and no.
>>
>> Yes enforcing. And ausearch -m AVC most recent entry is three days ago.
>
> Try updating to selinux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/16/2014 03:52 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 12:28:35 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>>> selinux-policy-targeted-3.12.1-116
>
>> perhaps in light of this saga it might be wise to set the autopush
>> threshold for selinux-pol
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 12:28:35 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > selinux-policy-targeted-3.12.1-116
> perhaps in light of this saga it might be wise
> to set the autopush threshold for selinux-policy updates higher than 3?
It would have been good if packagers themselves would increase the karma
th
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 14:19 -0600, Dan Mossor wrote:
>
> On 01/16/2014 10:33 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >
> > On Jan 16, 2014, at 9:03 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> It definitely isn't dnf mucking up. This is the second time I've fresh
> >> installed today, and I haven't used dnf at all. I
On 01/16/2014 10:33 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Jan 16, 2014, at 9:03 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
It definitely isn't dnf mucking up. This is the second time I've fresh
installed today, and I haven't used dnf at all. I installed my apps,
updated, and I got a bunch of scriptlet failures:
1. I j
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 19:58:23 +0100, Lars Seipel wrote:
> Hmm, I just encountered the scriptlet issue using yum but can also
> reproduce with dnf. Trying to remove the resulting duplicate packages
> gets me more of the same _unless_ I toggle SELinux to permissive mode.
> Then 'yum remove' completes
On 01/16/2014 11:03 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 09:22 -0600, Dan Mossor wrote:
I forgot to mention that - I haven't typed the letters dnf at all on
this system until I wrote this email.
Yum is what I know, yum is what I use.
Also forgot to mention that I have systemd-208-9.fc2
On Jan 16, 2014, at 11:58 AM, Lars Seipel wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 08:42:31AM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> I don't think it's selinux because I ausearch -m AVC hasn't report anything
>> for me in three days. I'm suspicious of initscripts though.
>
> Hmm, I just encountered the scr
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 08:42:31AM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> I don't think it's selinux because I ausearch -m AVC hasn't report anything
> for me in three days. I'm suspicious of initscripts though.
Hmm, I just encountered the scriptlet issue using yum but can also
reproduce with dnf. Tryin
> > Is this with SELinux enforcing/permissive/disabled?
> > Do you get any AVC denied messages in the logs?
>
> For me, yes and no.
>
> Yes enforcing. And ausearch -m AVC most recent entry is three days ago.
Try updating to selinux-policy\* from updates-testing.
I've returned to my rawhide-to-F
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 10:07 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:35:23PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 23:03 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 04:16:43PM +1100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > > > I know
> > > > I can probably fix
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:35:23PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 23:03 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 04:16:43PM +1100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > > I know
> > > I can probably fix it removing each package individually etc, but it'll
> > > take me le
On Jan 16, 2014, at 9:36 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 03:11:53 +1100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>
>>> 53 error: %pre(mpd-1:0.18-0.1.git0e0be02.fc20.x86_64) scriptlet failed,
>>> exit status 127
>>> history info
>>> [asinha@eng051125 ~]$
>>
>> I've switched on whatever flags I
On Jan 16, 2014, at 9:03 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>
> It definitely isn't dnf mucking up. This is the second time I've fresh
> installed today, and I haven't used dnf at all. I installed my apps,
> updated, and I got a bunch of scriptlet failures:
1. I just did a rollback to a bit over 2 weeks a
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Jan 16, 2014, at 9:03 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>
> >
> > It definitely isn't dnf mucking up. This is the second time I've fresh
> > installed today, and I haven't used dnf at all. I installed my apps,
> > updated, and I got a bunch of scr
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 03:11:53 +1100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > 53 error: %pre(mpd-1:0.18-0.1.git0e0be02.fc20.x86_64) scriptlet failed,
> > exit status 127
> > history info
> > [asinha@eng051125 ~]$
>
> I've switched on whatever flags I could find in yum. More hints?
Is this with SELinux enforci
On 01/16/2014 10:11 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 03:03 +1100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
It definitely isn't dnf mucking up. This is the second time I've fresh
installed today, and I haven't used dnf at all. I installed my apps,
updated, and I got a bunch of scriptlet failures:
More
On Jan 16, 2014, at 8:33 AM, nonamedotc wrote:
> On 01/16/2014 09:22 AM, Dan Mossor wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 01/16/2014 08:49 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jan 16, 2014, at 7:44 AM, Chris Murphy
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Jan 16, 2014, at 7:14 AM, Dan Mossor wrote:
>
>
>>>
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 03:03 +1100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>
> It definitely isn't dnf mucking up. This is the second time I've fresh
> installed today, and I haven't used dnf at all. I installed my apps,
> updated, and I got a bunch of scriptlet failures:
More:
> sudo yum -d 10 install mpd --rpmverb
>>
>> NetworkManager qt selinux-policy libreoffice firewalld firewall-config
>> initscripts
It's not any of these.
Chris Murphy
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 09:22 -0600, Dan Mossor wrote:
> I forgot to mention that - I haven't typed the letters dnf at all on
> this system until I wrote this email.
>
> Yum is what I know, yum is what I use.
>
> Also forgot to mention that I have systemd-208-9.fc20.x86_64
It definitely isn't dnf
On 01/16/2014 09:22 AM, Dan Mossor wrote:
On 01/16/2014 08:49 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Jan 16, 2014, at 7:44 AM, Chris Murphy
wrote:
On Jan 16, 2014, at 7:14 AM, Dan Mossor wrote:
On 01/16/2014 01:10 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
There's something off somewhere. I just fresh installed fr
On 01/16/2014 08:49 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Jan 16, 2014, at 7:44 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Jan 16, 2014, at 7:14 AM, Dan Mossor wrote:
On 01/16/2014 01:10 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
There's something off somewhere. I just fresh installed from the Alpha USB
stick I had. I ran a dnf u
On Jan 16, 2014, at 7:44 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Jan 16, 2014, at 7:14 AM, Dan Mossor wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 01/16/2014 01:10 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>>> There's something off somewhere. I just fresh installed from the Alpha USB
>>> stick I had. I ran a dnf update which went OK, other t
On Jan 16, 2014, at 7:14 AM, Dan Mossor wrote:
>
>
> On 01/16/2014 01:10 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>> There's something off somewhere. I just fresh installed from the Alpha USB
>> stick I had. I ran a dnf update which went OK, other than the usbmuxd
>> scriptlet failure which iirc is a known issu
On 01/16/2014 01:10 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
There's something off somewhere. I just fresh installed from the Alpha USB
stick I had. I ran a dnf update which went OK, other than the usbmuxd
scriptlet failure which iirc is a known issue. After that, I got down to
installing my other packages and I
Hi,
Can you help me to get up-to-date instruction how to create Fedora (19 or
20) install ISO? The following documentation
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_a_Fedora_install_ISO_for_testing is
not topical for these releases.
Thank you in advance.
--
Vyacheslav Sarzhan
PortaOne, Inc.
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 08:27:02 -0500 (EST)
Joerg Lechner wrote:
> Hi, printed a pdf via Adobe Reader 9.
Try print with say "evince" see do you get the same problem.
Though kinda off-topic as F20 is already released.
___
Regards,
Frank
www.frankly3d.com
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedorapr
Hi, printed a pdf via Adobe Reader 9. I didn't find a menue to choose the
cassette as paper feeder for printing. It was only possible to print from the
rear paper feeder (I hope I have used the correct nomination for the paper
feeder in the back of the printer). Is this a Cups problem? Or Adobe
On Tue, 14 Jan 2014 11:42:25 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Since it's "Orphaned" in pkgdb and not "Deprecated" (= retired) yet,
> > it's needs at least somebody with permission to retire it in pkgdb.
> > Somebody from releng usually can do that, too.
> >
> > Similarly for dist git. It needs c
37 matches
Mail list logo
