Re: Fedora 21 Final test coverage

2014-11-07 Thread Sudhir Dharanendraiah
- Original Message - | From: "Adam Williamson" | To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org, sdhar...@redhat.com | Sent: Saturday, November 8, 2014 12:48:40 AM | Subject: Fedora 21 Final test coverage | | Hi, folks! Just taking a look through testcase_stats, some tests that | have never or rarely

Re: fedup failure

2014-11-07 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2014-11-07 at 16:48 -0800, Per Bothner wrote: > I wanted to try to updating to what will soon be Fedora 21. > I tried using fedup, but failed miserably. Did I use the correct incantation? Well. Not according to the release information, which we've been waving all over the place lately: h

fedup failure

2014-11-07 Thread Per Bothner
I wanted to try to updating to what will soon be Fedora 21. I tried using fedup, but failed miserably. Did I use the correct incantation? All the references to fc22 are ... surprising. # fedup --network 21 --product=workstation --debuglog=/var/log/fedupdebug.log setting up repos... default-inst

Re: Announcing the release of Fedora 21 Beta!

2014-11-07 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 07:26 -0500, Joerg Lechner wrote: > Hi, > what is confusing is that F21-Final-TC1 has 1.4GB and > the download link for prerelease says: > > "Download now! > > 1.4GB, ISO format image for 64bit-compatible PC" > > Therefore I don't know, the "1.3GB build beta RC4" or the "1.

Re: installation matrix environment adjustments

2014-11-07 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2014-11-07 at 13:02 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote: > I have a proposal regarding installation matrix [1] related to > environments. Adam did a truly stellar job in his latest results table > restructuring, he eliminated a lot of duplicated testing and > simplified the tables a lot (for example,

Re: Fedora 21 - Unallocated space undetected

2014-11-07 Thread Antonio Trande
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/07/2014 06:37 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Antonio Trandewrote: > > > Unallocated space was contained in an extended partition; Anaconda > detected only free space on the outside of it. > > > Would you

Re: Fedora 21 - Unallocated space undetected

2014-11-07 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2014-11-07 at 16:00 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Fri, 2014-11-07 at 08:26 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > AIUI that's by design. Partitioned space is not 'free' by anaconda's > > definition, and anaconda will not just assume you don't care about the > > partition and reallocate it

Re: Fedora 21 - Unallocated space undetected

2014-11-07 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Fri, 2014-11-07 at 08:26 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > AIUI that's by design. Partitioned space is not 'free' by anaconda's > definition, and anaconda will not just assume you don't care about the > partition and reallocate it. 'Free space' only refers to *unallocated* > space. Well in genera

Re: Linux multi-boot release criterion discussion, redux

2014-11-07 Thread Peter Jones
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 11:34:16AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > More criteria time, folks! > > So we managed to get the Windows multi-boot criterion revised and an OS > X multi-boot criterion added, but we did not yet manage to come to a > consensus on exactly what should be required for Linux

Re: Linux multi-boot release criterion discussion, redux

2014-11-07 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2014-11-07 at 11:34 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > More criteria time, folks! > > So we managed to get the Windows multi-boot criterion revised and an OS > X multi-boot criterion added, but we did not yet manage to come to a > consensus on exactly what should be required for Linux multi-b

Linux multi-boot release criterion discussion, redux

2014-11-07 Thread Adam Williamson
More criteria time, folks! So we managed to get the Windows multi-boot criterion revised and an OS X multi-boot criterion added, but we did not yet manage to come to a consensus on exactly what should be required for Linux multi-boot. I think Chris will re-propose his last idea and we can discuss

Fedora 21 Final test coverage

2014-11-07 Thread Adam Williamson
Hi, folks! Just taking a look through testcase_stats, some tests that have never or rarely been run for 21 jump out at me. We should get these run ASAP so we can spot any blockers in them early. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_updates.img_via_installation_source https://fedorap

installation matrix environment adjustments

2014-11-07 Thread Kamil Paral
I have a proposal regarding installation matrix [1] related to environments. Adam did a truly stellar job in his latest results table restructuring, he eliminated a lot of duplicated testing and simplified the tables a lot (for example, there's no point in testing additional HTTP repos in anacon

Re: Fedora 21 - Unallocated space undetected

2014-11-07 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Antonio Trande wrote: > > Unallocated space was contained in an extended partition; Anaconda > detected only free space on the outside of it. > Would you please file a bug report against anaconda with this information? Post the link here when you are done. Ra

Re: Fedora 21 - Unallocated space undetected

2014-11-07 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2014-11-07 at 16:16 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: > On 11/07/2014 04:04 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 19:39 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: > >> Hi all. > >> > >> By installing Fedora 21 live Workstation, I noted that all > >> unallocated space on hardisk is not detected so

Re: Adding GNOME ....

2014-11-07 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2014-11-07 at 09:10 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote: > Now you might believe that yum group list would show all groups ... it > does not. Give the follow a try: > > yum group info gnome\* > yum group info kde\* > yum group info xfce\* > yum group info cinnamon\* > yum group

Re: Fedora 21 - Unallocated space undetected

2014-11-07 Thread Antonio Trande
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/07/2014 04:04 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 19:39 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: >> Hi all. >> >> By installing Fedora 21 live Workstation, I noted that all >> unallocated space on hardisk is not detected so it's not >> available

Re: Fedora 21 - Unallocated space undetected

2014-11-07 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 19:39 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: > Hi all. > > By installing Fedora 21 live Workstation, I noted that all unallocated > space on hardisk is not detected so it's not available for a standard > partitioning. I had to format in ext4 the unallocated space of which I > needed in

Re: Adding GNOME ....

2014-11-07 Thread Gene Czarcinski
On 11/05/2014 07:49 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 16:13 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: Bill, Stephen, Matt, Kalev - I think we could stand to take another look at this. I see two immediate issues: 2) We just don't have a good story for installing extra desktops post-install an

Re: infinality-noarch repo

2014-11-07 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 13:44:54 +1000, Adrian wrote: > > yum-config-manager --disable infinality-noarch > > Above is necessary to enable some installs noticed today ; > > [root@fedora21desk ~]# yum install alsa-plugins-pulseaudio > > http://www.infinality.net/fedora/linux/21/x86_64/repodata/repom

F-21 Branched report: 20141107 changes

2014-11-07 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Fri Nov 7 07:45:03 UTC 2014 Broken deps for armhfp -- [PyQuante] PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc21.1.armv7hl requires libint(armv7hl-32) = 0:1.1.6-2.fc21 [audtty] audtty-0.1.12-9.fc20.armv7hl requires libaudcli

rawhide report: 20141107 changes

2014-11-07 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Fri Nov 7 05:15:04 UTC 2014 Broken deps for i386 -- [3Depict] 3Depict-0.0.16-3.fc22.i686 requires libmgl.so.7.2.0 [Sprog] Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0) [audtty] audtt