On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 23:15 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> Tackling this one separately:
>
> Current Fedora 22 final release criteria of concern and some distain:
>
> "The installer must be able to create and install to any workable
> partition layout using any file system and/or container format
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 01:57:52 -0400
Felix Miata wrote:
> Old old host gx260, i845G video, single core 2.4GHz P4, 1G RAM; KDE.
>
> Method used:
> (update F21; reboot; suffer through (clock-related/superblock last
> mount time in the future) boot fsck on all 8 previously mounted
> partitions) https
Old old host gx260, i845G video, single core 2.4GHz P4, 1G RAM; KDE.
Method used:
(update F21; reboot; suffer through (clock-related/superblock last mount time
in the future) boot fsck on all 8 previously mounted partitions)
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum
# rpm --import
Tackling this one separately:
Current Fedora 22 final release criteria of concern and some distain:
"The installer must be able to create and install to any workable
partition layout using any file system and/or container format
combination offered in a default installer configuration."
That's a
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> When using the custom partitioning flow, the installer must be able to:
>
> * Correctly display, remove, and assign mount points to existing
> storage volumes of the supported types (requiring entry of the
> encryption passphrase, for encry
On 03/19/2015 04:14 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
And obviously, for those packagers who don't mind the timeout, Bodhi could
improve and offer an option to push an update to stable automatically
after the timeout. Or after a customizable timeout, so e.g. the maintainer
could request "21 days" inste
On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 09:44:27 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> I think it can be a judgement call on certain packages. For example, I
> maintain the Review Board packages which almost never get karma from
> more than one person (and that usually only for whichiver Fedora or
> EPEL branch that p
The following Fedora 21 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
96
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-16833/asterisk-11.14.2-1.fc21
87
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-17139/aeskulap-0.2.2-0.20beta1.fc21,orthanc-0.8.5-2.fc21,dcmtk-3.6.1-1.fc21
71 http
On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 09:44 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-03-15 at 14:47 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > Can we please "fix" those people, who hate bodhi so much that they
> > feel the need to submit updates with a low "karma: 1" threshold?
> >
> > It just doesn't work and cau
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
107
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15988/fail2ban-0.9.1-1.fc20
96
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-16845/resteasy-3.0.6-3.fc20
96
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-1
On Sun, 2015-03-15 at 14:47 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Can we please "fix" those people, who hate bodhi so much that they
> feel the need to submit updates with a low "karma: 1" threshold?
>
> It just doesn't work and causes breakage too often. Broken
> dependencies and/or breakage at runt
Compose started at Thu Mar 19 07:15:02 UTC 2015
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0)
[aeskulap]
aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc22.armv7hl requires libofstd.so.3.6
12 matches
Mail list logo
