Re: Non-image blocker process change proposal

> Accepted0Day (for bugs where the fix must appear in 0-day updates for > the new release) > AcceptedStable (for bugs where the fix must appear in updates for the > previous stable release(s) by release day of the new release) > > I'm not 100% married to either of those, especially the second. If

[Test-Announce]Reminder: Fedora 21 end of life on 2015-12-01

As the Fedora 21 support is going to be EOL, we are going to close all the Fedora 21 bugs which remains open the next Tuesday 2015-12-01 [1]. You have the last chance to submit your updates to the Fedora 21, if you have any, before the F-21 release becomes unsupported. [1]

rawhide report: 20151126 changes

Compose started at Thu Nov 26 05:15:02 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [IQmol] IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0

Re: Non-image blocker process change proposal

> OK. I was just trying to point out that there needs to be about 1-2 day > period (releng knows best) between the 0 day push and the actual > announcement. Maybe that's why we usually have 4 days between Go and the > announcement? I don't know whether there's a releng process for it or not, > but

Re: testcase proposal: joining bios+uefi in system upgrade section

> On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 06:33 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote: > > > As a middle ground, what about having: > >    .---. > >    |  BIOS UEFI| > >    |Testcase_upgrade_dnf_previous_any  | > >    

Fedora Rawhide 20151126 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud disk raw i386 Cloud disk raw x86_64 Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64 Workstation live i386 Workstation live x86_64 No images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151125 No images in Rawhide 20151125 but not this. Failed openQA tests: 48 of 49 ID: 9071Test:

Re: testcase proposal: joining bios+uefi in system upgrade section

On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 10:23 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 06:33 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote: > > > > > As a middle ground, what about having: > > >    .---. > > >    |  BIOS UEFI| > > >    

Fedora 21 updates-testing report

The following Fedora 21 Security updates need testing: Age URL 299 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1467 openstack-glance-2014.1.3-4.fc21 180 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9141 ceph-deploy-1.5.25-1.fc21 169

Re: Fedora Rawhide 20151126 compose check report

On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 10:24 -0500, Fedora compose checker wrote: > Failed openQA tests: 48 of 49 new dracut broke the world: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285903 KDE also seems to be booting to a Plasma shell error, I'll check that out. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community

Fedora 22 updates-testing report

The following Fedora 22 Security updates need testing: Age URL 231 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5878 echoping-6.1-0.beta.r434svn.1.fc22 180 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9185 ceph-deploy-1.5.25-1.fc22 113

Fedora 23 updates-testing report

The following Fedora 23 Security updates need testing: Age URL 113 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-12739 python-kdcproxy-0.3.2-1.fc23 96 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5eb2131441 conntrack-tools-1.4.2-9.fc23 67

[Test-Announce]Reminder: Fedora 21 end of life on 2015-12-01

As the Fedora 21 support is going to be EOL, we are going to close all the Fedora 21 bugs which remains open the next Tuesday 2015-12-01 [1]. You have the last chance to submit your updates to the Fedora 21, if you have any, before the F-21 release becomes unsupported. [1]