Fedora 24 compose report: 20160229.n.1 changes

OLD: Fedora-24-20160229.n.0 NEW: Fedora-24-20160229.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added packages: 8 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 88 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 15.37 MiB Size of dropped packages:0.00 B Size of upgraded packages: 3.09 GiB Size

Re: Is anyone but me using fedfind for anything?

On Sun, 2016-02-28 at 09:17 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 05:26:36PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > However, I wanted to ask if anyone apart from me is using fedfind as a > > Python package. If there *are* any non-me users, I'll probably try to > > be a bit polite

Fedora 22 updates-testing report

The following Fedora 22 Security updates need testing: Age URL 326 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5878 echoping-6.1-0.beta.r434svn.1.fc22 275 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9185 ceph-deploy-1.5.25-1.fc22 208

Criteria note: storage volume resize change

Hi folks! Just thought I'd mention this on-list. As discussed in the bug report, on anaconda-devel-list, and at today's blocker review meeting, anaconda team is strongly of the opinion that the release criteria should not seem to dictate anaconda's behaviour with regard to 'resizing' unknown

2016-02-29 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting - Minutes

== #fedora-meeting: Fedora QA meeting == Meeting started by adamw at 16:02:29 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-02-29/fedora-qa.2016-02-29-16.02.log.html . Meeting summary

Fedora 24 compose report: 20160229.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-24-20160228.n.0 NEW: Fedora-24-20160229.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 39 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:0.00 B Size of upgraded packages: 260.73 MiB Size

Fedora 22 updates-testing report

The following Fedora 22 Security updates need testing: Age URL 325 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5878 echoping-6.1-0.beta.r434svn.1.fc22 274 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9185 ceph-deploy-1.5.25-1.fc22 207

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20160229.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160227.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160229.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 85 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:16.98 KiB Size of upgraded packages: 939.52 MiB

Re: Criteria proposal: applying 'post-install' criteria to live and appliance images

> > I hesitate whether we should mandate working updates in live environment: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_Alpha_Criteria_Postinstall#Updates > > Er, we wouldn't? That criterion still explicitly states "The installed > system". When a criterion had text like that I

Re: A modest proposal: Pungi 4 compose process (what we call composes, when we do them, what information we need about them)

> > I do, immediately, and that's the point. When I see all the composes > > in the pungi directory, I can immediately see what is the today's > > latest one, and I see which ones are yesterday ones. > > Oh, but you referred to running tools. Yes, but I meant manually running them. Diffing two

Re: Non-image blocker process change proposal

> Hello folks, > > I'd like to return to the high-level overview for this topic and discuss the > changes we plan to do in our SOPs. Since there was not much feedback, we agreed on a QA meeting that I'll just go ahead and draft all related SOP changes. Here we go: 1. SOP blocker bug process: