On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 5:48 AM Mukul Maheshwari
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> I am Mukul from Dehradun India, currently pursuing BTech CSE from UPES
> Dehradun. I like contributing to open source & have been using fedora for
> last few months. I am linux enthusiast & have worked in C development.
>
Hi everyone,
As Fedora IoT is an official edition now, the Fedora QA team finds it
necessary to merge the existing Fedora IoT release criteria [0] into the
existing criteria [1]. As it stands however, the IoT criteria have not been
"rated" as to which criteria go where; Basic, Beta, or Final.
The
On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 10:14 AM George R Goffe wrote:
>
> Chris,
>
> Thank you for your help.
>
> I had to re-create the initramfs as well and, change fstab too. The process
> was up hill in both directions... due to my fumbling. Sigh.
>
> I now have a VM FC34 x86_64 (Rawhide) running with btrfs
Hello everyone,
I am Mukul from Dehradun India, currently pursuing BTech CSE from UPES
Dehradun. I like contributing to open source & have been using fedora for
last few months. I am linux enthusiast & have worked in C development.
I would be glad to be accepted in fedora QA team. You can contact
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
3 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 12/181 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20200906.n.0):
ID:
On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 2:24 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 8:17 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 2020-09-04 at 12:12 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>> > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 12:57 pm, Kamil Paral wrote:
>> > > Overall I find the criterion reasonable and useful and
Chris,
Thank you for your help.
I had to re-create the initramfs as well and, change fstab too. The process was
up hill in both directions... due to my fumbling. Sigh.
I now have a VM FC34 x86_64 (Rawhide) running with btrfs file systems.
After a few upgrades I did an "init 0" command. The VM
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20200906.0):
ID: 657523 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/657523
Passed openQA tests: 15/16 (x86_64)
Installed system cha
Hello everyone,
I'd like to announce a new project of the QA team and an extension of the
BlockerBugs App [1]. The blocker and freeze exception proposals can now not
only be discussed during regular blocker review meetings [2], but also at
any time through discussion tickets hosted on Pagure [3].
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 10/181 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-33-20200906.n.0):
ID: 657220 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/657220
ID: 657266 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso i
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64)
ID: 657453 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/657453
ID: 657459 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedorap
OLD: Fedora-33-20200906.n.0
NEW: Fedora-33-20200907.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On Thu, 2020-08-27 at 15:12 -0400, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote:
> alciregi,
>
> I have a similar issue. Reference the bug below.
>
And ok, via cups web interface I'm able to configure the printer.
Actually, I'm also able to configure the printe on GNOME, but only if I
specify the IP address of
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200906.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200907.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 51
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 64.95 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproj
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20200905.0):
ID: 656801 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproj
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 8:17 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-09-04 at 12:12 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 12:57 pm, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > > Overall I find the criterion reasonable and useful and I'm +1 to
> > > incorporating it. Its current phrasing seems fi
17 matches
Mail list logo
