I have about 6 man-hours of usage of Fedora 34 WS Beta, and there are
no f33 packages on my install.
I did a query, and dnf said that 1721 lines are counted.I do not think
I have installed much yet. I assume there are packages that can be
removed that I have no use for.That is on my lo
Samuel Sieb composed on 2021-03-31 20:44 (UTC-0700):
> Felix Miata wrote:
>> Of 2298 installed packages, 456 are still .fc33. Can that be right at this
>> stage
>> of development? I found and removed several that I found more than one
>> installed
>> version of, not necessarily one each of f33
On 3/31/21 6:48 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
Of 2298 installed packages, 456 are still .fc33. Can that be right at this stage
of development? I found and removed several that I found more than one installed
version of, not necessarily one each of f33 and f34. e.g. both 7.5-26 and 7.5-30
of f34 xorg-x11
Of 2298 installed packages, 456 are still .fc33. Can that be right at this stage
of development? I found and removed several that I found more than one installed
version of, not necessarily one each of f33 and f34. e.g. both 7.5-26 and 7.5-30
of f34 xorg-x11-fonts-misc, and 2.37-15 and 2.37-16 of f
Dear Lukas,
Thank you for letting me know.
Kind Regards,
Alisina
On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 at 21:51, Lukas Brabec wrote:
> This mail is addressed to Outreachy applicants interested in contributing
> or already contributing to Fedora QA Dashboard.
>
> Due to public holiday in Czech Republic mentors
This mail is addressed to Outreachy applicants interested in contributing
or already contributing to Fedora QA Dashboard.
Due to public holiday in Czech Republic mentors will not be available in
these dates:
* lbrabec: Apr 1 - Apr 5
* jskladan: Apr 2 - Apr 5
Lukas
__
On 3/31/21 2:47 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
I tried to upgrade from fc33 to fc34 BETA by usage of dnf system-upgrade
which I did successfully
for the last 4 or 5 fedora versions by the usage of that dnf plugin. But
for fc33, I was not successful:
The finalizing command "sudo dnf system-upgrade
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/15 (aarch64), 1/16 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210329.0):
ID: 838515 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_rebase@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/838515
Old failures (same test f
Dear Sumanto,
I faced the same problem as Emmanuel. I cannot join git*fedora-qa* group as
well.
Kind Regards,
Alisina Bolourchi
On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 at 17:38, Emmanuel Okwuidegbe <
okwuidegbeemman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Sumantro,
>
> Thank you for your reply. But I would like to know if th
On Tue, 2021-03-30 at 23:22 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-03-30 at 17:23 -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Following up on a broken update that got pushed:
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-d42d8643e4
> >
> > (I'm not naming the packag
Dear Sumantro,
Thank you for your reply. But I would like to know if the group I should
join is the git*fedora-qa* group?
I look forward to hearing from you soon.
---
Best Regards,
*Okwuidegbe Emmanuel *
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 5:20 PM Sumantro Mukherjee
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 9:43 PM Emmanuel Okwuidegbe <
okwuidegbeemman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Sumantro,
>
> Thank you for your email. I'm an Outreachy applicant looking to start
> contributing to the Fedora QA Dashboard Project.
>
> The following are what i've already done in no order:
> - Sub
Dear Sumantro,
Thank you for your email. I'm an Outreachy applicant looking to start
contributing to the Fedora QA Dashboard Project.
The following are what i've already done in no order:
- Subscribed to the test mailing list.
- Joined #fedora-qa IRC channel on Freenode.
- Introduced myself to t
Dear Lukas,
I have forgotten to mention I am interested in the QA Dashboard project. I
am willing to contribute to that.
Kind regards,
Alisina
On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 at 10:55, Alisina Bolourchi
wrote:
> Dear Lukas,
>
> Thank you for your email. the webchat is working I have tried the link for
>
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 3/15 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210328.0):
ID: 838359 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_overlay
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/838359
O
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 1:27 PM Lukas Ruzicka wrote:
> Hello friends of Fedora,
>
> I would like to propose a new release covering criterion that was
> suggested on the yesterday's Blocker Review Meeting. Please let me know,
> what you think about it and perhaps suggest improvements.
>
> Target:
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
3 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 11/178 (x86_64), 17/127 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210330.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210331.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:9
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:10
Upgraded packages: 71
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 5.13 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On 3/31/21 12:05 PM, Thomas Mittelstaedt wrote:
Am 31.03.2021 11:47 schrieb Joachim Backes
:
Hi,
I tried to upgrade from fc33 to fc34 BETA by usage of dnf
system-upgrade
which I did successfully
for the last 4 or 5 fedora versions by the usage of that dnf
plugin. B
Am 31.03.2021 11:47 schrieb Joachim Backes :Hi,
I tried to upgrade from fc33 to fc34 BETA by usage of dnf system-upgrade
which I did successfully
for the last 4 or 5 fedora versions by the usage of that dnf plugin. But
for fc33, I was not successful:
The finalizing command "sudo dnf sys
Dear Lukas,
Thank you for your email. the webchat is working I have tried the link for
the chat it is working:
I was talking about this link:
https://accounts.fedoraproject.org/group/gitfedora-qa/
Lukas, I am willing to start contributing where should I begin? I haven't
got previous experience in
Hi,
I tried to upgrade from fc33 to fc34 BETA by usage of dnf system-upgrade
which I did successfully
for the last 4 or 5 fedora versions by the usage of that dnf plugin. But
for fc33, I was not successful:
The finalizing command "sudo dnf system-upgrade reboot" did a reboot,
but without th
Hi Alisina,
welcome to Fedora QA.
I assume that by "the link for the QA group" you mean the link to join
#fedora-qa channel on IRC (https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#fedora-qa).
The link is working for me and I was able to join the channel.
Did you encounter any errors?
On Tue, Mar 30, 2
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210330.0):
ID: 837734 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
Hi Linda,
there are tips for Outreachy applicants in the readme of the project (
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/landingpage), please start from there, if
anything is unclear feel to send me an email to lbra...@redhat.com
L.
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 7:02 PM Linda Okorie
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
>
Hey Okwuidegbe Emmanuel!
Welcome to Fedora QA!
I see you are interested in JS and Reactjs, is by any chance you are
looking at Outreachy project?
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 12:34 PM Emmanuel Okwuidegbe
wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm very glad to join the team. I'm a newbie to open source and have
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/7 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210330.0):
ID: 837676 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_update_cli@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/837676
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64),
27 matches
Mail list logo
