Hello Misterx42
You will see there is a new update now on RPM fusion from "mpv
0.33.0-6.fc34" and this new build solves the dependency problem.
best regards
Geraldo
geraldosimiao
Em sex., 2 de abr. de 2021 às 15:18, misterx42--- via test <
test@lists.fedoraproject.org> escreveu:
> I'm not
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/178 (x86_64), 6/127 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210330.n.0):
ID: 839705 Test: x86_64 universal install_xfs@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/839705
ID: 839766 Test: aarch64 universal
On Thu, 2021-04-01 at 23:36 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 1:12 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 7:27 AM Lukas Ruzicka wrote:
> > >
> > > I would like to propose a new release covering criterion that was
> > > suggested on the yesterday's Blocker
Dear community,
Can Outreachy pre interns open issue or Mentors should do it?
Kind Regards,
Alisina
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 3:50 AM TheEvilSkeleton
wrote:
>
> I tried using /boot on btrfs a couple of times some days ago, and it kept
> failing each time until I used ext4.
>
> This is bad UX. If I need to "fiddle with enough" on a problem that wasn't
> supposed to be a problem, it should be
I'm not sure if this is supposed to go to the bug tracker, so I thought I'll
report it here first.
libplacebo is currently being blocked from upgrading due to mpv's dependency on
the old version:
Problem: package mpv-0.33.0-5.fc34.x86_64 requires libplacebo.so.104()(64bit),
but none of the
I'm not sure if this is supposed to go to the bug tracker, so I thought I'll
report it here first.
libplacebo is currently being blocked from upgrading due to mpv's dependency on
the old version:
Problem: package mpv-0.33.0-5.fc34.x86_64 requires libplacebo.so.104()(64bit),
but none of the
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 3:42 AM TheEvilSkeleton
wrote:
>
> A couple of days ago I tried to manually install Fedora 34 Silverblue on UEFI
> system and it kept failing when I was using /boot on btrfs. When I switched
> to ext4, it installed flawlessly. I will try it soon on the ISO you linked
>
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 11:18 AM Proprietary Chrome-chan <
theevilskele...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> `/boot` can be used on btrfs. However, Anaconda forces me to use ext4 in
> that specific, when it shouldn't if you use btrfs.
>
> I'd like to request allowing `/boot` to be used on btrfs.
I tried using /boot on btrfs a couple of times some days ago, and it kept
failing each time until I used ext4.
This is bad UX. If I need to "fiddle with enough" on a problem that wasn't
supposed to be a problem, it should be addressed.
By default, when using the automatic install process,
A couple of days ago I tried to manually install Fedora 34 Silverblue on UEFI
system and it kept failing when I was using /boot on btrfs. When I switched to
ext4, it installed flawlessly. I will try it soon on the ISO you linked and
will report back if this issue persists or not.
On April 1,
11 matches
Mail list logo
