Hi,
when I try to install golang-godoc I get the following error:
[root@nexusm ~]# yum install golang-godoc
Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package golang-godoc.x86_64 0:1.1-2.fc19 will be installed
--> Processing Dependency:
Hi,
i just booted the live iso in a VM with 1G of memory and after I start
"Software" the VM locks up completely after a few seconds. Having "top"
open while starting "Software" shows very little free/cached RAM left
over before the system dies so I upped the RAM of the VM to 2G and with
that
On 20.11.2013 00:35, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 15:31 -0800, Richard Vickery wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 11:25 -0800, James Patterson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I noticed the new Fedora 20
On 23.10.2013 14:30, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
On 23.10.2013 12:41, Paul Knox-Kennedy wrote:
Many thanks for that, your workaround resolved my issues. Is there a
bugzilla entry for this? I couldn't find anything in redhat or gnome
bugzilla that seemed to apply.
Cheers
Paul
Bug report: htt
On 05.09.2013 18:15, John Dulaney wrote:
RE the Raspberry Pi, alas, Fedroa does not support it; for one it's ARMv6
and is an old architecture, and the kernel to run it is not fully open source.
How can the kernel not be fully open source and not violate the gpl license?
Regards,
Dennis
--
On 09.09.2013 20:31, Richard Vickery wrote:
Hi gang:
I'm on F20. The only way I get a screen that anyone can see is not by
using the portable computer's screen, but plugging it into another
screen. I tried going into the "Power" control but it's already on
maximum brightness. Any Ideas on how el
On 16.08.2013 02:42, Lawrence Graves wrote:
Videos will not play on Firefox 23. No errormessages.
I have updated to Firefox 23 and videos work fine.
Regards,
Dennis
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Hi,
I'm wondering what the story with java packaging on F19 is? There is a
version 1.8 and a version 1.7 however verion 1.7 apparently has no i686
packages. This is not a problem for version 1.8 but the icedtea-web
apparently only works with 1.7?
What is required to have both the x86_64 and i68
On 07.06.2013 07:02, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 23:25 +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 28.05.2013 02:23, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 02:21 +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Hi,
I just installed Fedora 19 beta rc4 using the netinstall iso in my new
On 28.05.2013 02:23, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 02:21 +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Hi,
I just installed Fedora 19 beta rc4 using the netinstall iso in my new
Dell XPS 13 ultrabook and while it seems to work fine out of the box
this morning I found that it apparently had
On 29.05.2013 06:02, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 22:52 +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 28.05.2013 05:55, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
I have this problem, but last time (after update) not affected
Best Regards,
Igor Gnatenko
On May 28, 2013 4:21 AM, "Dennis Jacobfeue
On 28.05.2013 02:23, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 02:21 +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Hi,
I just installed Fedora 19 beta rc4 using the netinstall iso in my new
Dell XPS 13 ultrabook and while it seems to work fine out of the box
this morning I found that it apparently had
On 28.05.2013 05:55, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
I have this problem, but last time (after update) not affected
Best Regards,
Igor Gnatenko
On May 28, 2013 4:21 AM, "Dennis Jacobfeuerborn" mailto:denni...@conversis.de>> wrote:
Hi,
I just installed Fedora 19 beta rc4 using th
Hi,
I just installed Fedora 19 beta rc4 using the netinstall iso in my new
Dell XPS 13 ultrabook and while it seems to work fine out of the box
this morning I found that it apparently had woken up again during the
night for no apparent reason.
Does anyone have an idea what could be the reason
On 19.04.2013 20:12, moshe nahmias wrote:
I have VT and VT-d on my bios, I enabled VT both and it doesn't help.
When I try to use the command eric gave (thanks for that) I have the
same problems with VT and VT-d enabled or disabled.
When I enabled VT-d I had an error from abrt that said that most
On 12/29/2012 03:45 PM, Richard Ryniker wrote:
>> How does having two PVs on the same spindle increase latency?
>
> Longer seeks - from one PV to the other - instead of two writes into the
> same PV.
>
Or the opposite depending on where the data is placed.
One PV/VG:
Create a 200G guest, make a
On 12/28/2012 05:47 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Dec 28, 2012, at 1:39 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>> On 12/28/2012 12:31 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>>
>>> If you mean you want a single partition consuming the whole disk, all of it
>>> in the VG, but to specify LVs that don't use all of the space i
On 11/07/2012 05:57 PM, Tim Flink wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Nov 2012 17:42:42 +0100
> Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> what is the status of openstack in Fedora 18?
>> The feature page doesn't describe how to get a working openstack
>> installation going
Hi,
what is the status of openstack in Fedora 18?
The feature page doesn't describe how to get a working openstack
installation going and the "openstack-demo-install" seems to run fine but
results in a non-working configuration.
Specifically the cinder and quantum services don't look like they are
On 11/04/2012 04:39 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 03:29 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>> On 11/04/2012 02:50 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 02:36 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>>>
>>>> Also what doe
On 11/04/2012 02:50 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 02:36 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>
>> Also what does this mean for UEFI installations with Fedora? When I install
>> F18 will it detect that the UEFI bits already exists on the harddisk and
>
On 11/04/2012 01:03 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 00:53 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>> On 11/04/2012 12:10 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>>
>>> On Nov 3, 2012, at 10:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>>
>>>> I don't know,
On 11/04/2012 12:10 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Nov 3, 2012, at 10:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>> I don't know, though, if it's actually been implemented yet, or if it's
>> still on someone's todo list. I couldn't find anything in the git log
>> for it, but I may have missed it. I've adde
On 11/03/2012 05:33 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-11-03 at 17:28 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>> On 11/03/2012 05:03 PM, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
>>> On 03/11/12 12:30, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Nov 3, 2012, at 11:14 AM, Erik P. Ol
On 11/03/2012 05:03 PM, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> On 03/11/12 12:30, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 3, 2012, at 11:14 AM, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
>>
>>> I installed T7 on a vbox virtual machine. However, it aborts almost at
>>> the end of installation. Don't know why. Attempted a new installation
>>>
On 10/27/2012 12:22 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 00:14 +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>> On 10/26/2012 07:49 PM, Tim Flink wrote:
>>> I've built a new smoke test image with:
>>> - btrfs-progs-0.20.rc1.20121017git91d9eec-1.fc18
>>&
On 10/27/2012 12:14 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> On 10/26/2012 07:49 PM, Tim Flink wrote:
>> I've built a new smoke test image with:
>> - btrfs-progs-0.20.rc1.20121017git91d9eec-1.fc18
>> - firstboot-18.4-1.fc18
>> - lorax-18.21-1.fc18.x86_64.rpm
On 10/26/2012 07:49 PM, Tim Flink wrote:
> I've built a new smoke test image with:
> - btrfs-progs-0.20.rc1.20121017git91d9eec-1.fc18
> - firstboot-18.4-1.fc18
> - lorax-18.21-1.fc18.x86_64.rpm
> - pykickstart-1.99.21-1.fc18
> - python-meh-0.18-1.fc18
>
> http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/q
Hi,
according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NMEnterpriseNetworking
NetworkManager should support bridging now in Fedora 17. The question is
how can I set this up? The GUI bits don't seem to be there yet but that
page also doesn't explain how this could be set up manually.
How can this
On 05/10/2012 11:33 AM, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 03:49:27AM -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
>>
>> I never heard of an ip command before.
>
> What can I say? 'man ip', as used by Fedora 16, has "17 January 2002"
> for a timestamp and quite possibly this is not the first version
On 05/02/2012 11:26 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 02:24 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
>> Did an upgrade from F16 to current F17 tree + updates on my server and
>> all seemed well.
>>
>> Except for dovecot..which after the upgrade, it seemed to error on my
>> client side (via imap
On 05/01/2012 08:18 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Tue, 01 May 2012 13:03:18 -0500
> John Morris wrote:
>
>> I depend on SMART being right
>> enough so I can usually yank a failing drive before it goes so bad the
>> worker can't login and use the machine.
>
> Of course, it was the SMART firmware on
On 12/07/2011 10:20 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 04:33:43PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
>> [redirecting to the fedora virt list]
>>
>> On 12/06/2011 03:36 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I noticed that when you instal
On 12/07/2011 10:20 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 04:33:43PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
>> [redirecting to the fedora virt list]
>>
>> On 12/06/2011 03:36 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I noticed that when you instal
Hi,
I noticed that when you install a virtual system with virt-manager it
always installs a tablet device by default.
The problem is that this device consumes 10% of cpu resources of the host
according to "top" which should probably be considered a bug.
What is worse is that removing the tablet
Hi,
what is the status of the open source drivers in Fedora 16 with regards to
the Radeon 69xx Northern Island cards? I booted the alpha live cd on a
system equipped with a 6950 card and got dumped into fallback mode and with
the recent ABI change the Catalyst driver is not going to work either
Hi,
I just stumbled over a strange phenomenon that makes top go bananas.
To reproduce open one shell window (and only one), switch to root and run
"top". Now close the shell window (without quitting top first).
top will now suddenly start to use 100% of one cpu core.
Things get more interesting
On 03/26/2011 05:30 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:05:21PM -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
>> I'm in the habit of running
>>
>> chkconfig --list | grep :on
>>
>> to list all of the services that are enabled on my system (usually right
>> after an installation, so I can disab
On 02/25/2011 02:09 PM, drago01 wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> In GNOME Shell, I've added a couple of apps to the "Favorites".
>>
>> Now, to start a first "xterm", I can single-click its icon in the list of
>> Favorites.
>>
>> To start another one, I need to r
On 12/12/2010 07:10 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 17:31:58 +, Adam wrote:
>
>> What Dennis is suggesting is that this section of the update
>> notification text should have been removed before the update was pushed
>> from updates-testing to stable, which is a reasonable sug
On 12/12/2010 12:27 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 23:41:14 +0100, Dennis wrote:
>
>>> Don't you trust the results of the testing [process] in general?
>>> Or do you think the mentioned tests are insufficient?
>>> And why would less verbose update notes be preferable?
>>
>> I'm n
On 12/11/2010 10:40 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 21:44:22 +0100, Dennis wrote:
>
>> On 12/11/2010 09:03 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 15:03 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>>>
>>>> Apart from the dupl
On 12/11/2010 09:03 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 15:03 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>
>> Apart from the duplicated last paragraph since when are users supposed to
>> test updates?
>
> The instructions are aimed at people testing updates-test
Hi,
In the latest round of updates I saw this message displayed in PackageKit
for the mdadm update:
"This update will fix bugs and other non-critical problems.
This notification was issued on 08/10/2010.
This is a bug fix update to mdadm. Please see the various bugs for a list
of issues that
I just noticed that when I boot with "nohz=off" I get improved vmstat
numbers. When playing a YouTube video I get an idle percentage of around
25-30 but when I boot with "nohz=off" the system seems to cope much better
and show an idle percentage of 50. Can anyone shed some light on what is
goin
Hi,
after updating to the latest gnome-desktop-2.32.0-2.fc14 the user switcher
applet stopped working. Downgrading to 2.32.0-1 fixed this.
Regards,
Dennis
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 11/09/2010 10:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 22:42 +0100, Fabian A. Scherschel wrote:
>> This about cuts the battery life of my laptop in half if I'm not
>> mistaken I understand it's not a blocker, but I can't believe the
>> kernel people don't consider this a bigger
On 11/08/2010 11:46 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 00:08 -0600, Jeff Raber wrote:
>
>> Seem similar to the issue described here:
>> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2010-October/094683.html
>>
>> I'm not sure if anything ever came of that discussion.
>
> Not much, b
On 11/08/2010 01:07 PM, Juan P. Daza P. wrote:
> This is due to a bug in the kernel:
>
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16525
>
Filed a Fedora bug here to track this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650934
That bug contains references to the kernel bug, the mailing list t
Hi,
I just made a fresh install of Fedora 14 and it seems that KMS+gnome is a
bit of a cpu hog. I can boot into runlevel 3 and the load will move towards
0 but when I move to runlevel 5 and logging in the system always has a load
of 0.5-1.0 even without starting any applications. The strange thi
On 10/20/2010 11:06 AM, cornel panceac wrote:
> 2010/10/20 cornel panceac mailto:cpanc...@gmail.com>>
>
> how can i install a newer kernel (or whatever is faulting here) if the
> system no longer boots?
> i get this error everytime i attempt boot:
>
> ...
> dracut: Switching roo
On 10/19/2010 09:06 AM, cornel panceac wrote:
> 2010/10/19 Ed Greshko mailto:ed.gres...@greshko.com>>
>
> On 10/19/2010 12:49 PM, cornel panceac wrote:
> > wouldn't it be nice to have a "You can safely remove device" message
> > displayed for a few seconds every time after you click
52 matches
Mail list logo
