On 06/20/2013 08:04 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 11:18:18 +0530
Kashyap Chamarthy kashy...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On 06/20/2013 11:12 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
Heya,
I've been using F19 for a while. For the past couple of days, I
don't see grub picking up latest kernel
Heya,
I've been using F19 for a while. For the past couple of days, I don't see grub
picking up
latest kernel.
- Kernel in use (despite rebooting, after installing newer kernels):
--
$ uname -r
3.10.0-0.rc2.git1.2.fc20.x86_64
--
- Available kernels:
--
$ rpm -q kernel
On 06/20/2013 11:12 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
Heya,
I've been using F19 for a while. For the past couple of days, I don't see
grub picking up
latest kernel.
- Kernel in use (despite rebooting, after installing newer kernels):
--
$ uname -r
3.10.0-0.rc2.git1.2.fc20.x86_64
Interesting part is a kernel from f18 works, and the 3.10-rc?? from
rawhide-nodebug works
as well.
Yes, I can certainly confirm the 3.10 RCs (and rawhide) builds have been
consistently
working for me, as I've been testing them w/ virt-preview kvm packages.
/kashyap
--
test mailing list
On 05/13/2013 02:59 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 05/12/2013 12:01 PM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
Heya,
That's what I see while I boot today's Rawhide Kernel.
File a bug
I forgot to notify here that it went away w/ 3.10-rc1.
Thanks for your response.
/kashyap
--
test mailing list
On 09/13/2012 02:28 AM, Scott Poore wrote:
Has anyone done kickstarts with F18 with text only with kvm guest (on F16 or
F17 host) with virt-install with --nographics?
I thought I'd seen/heard that people had done text installs but, I can't seem
I'm trying this:
virt-install
On 09/12/2012 01:41 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On 2012-09-11 12:54, Eric Blake wrote:
On 09/11/2012 01:27 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Things can go to updates-testing just fine at present. freeze only means
they can't go to 'stable'.
Unless there's some reason why not which hasn't been stated
for qemu, i've opened a bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=814814
Just a side note: you may also want to subscribe to Fedora Virt list, where
more Virt devs
hanging out.
v...@lists.fedoraproject.org
/kashyap
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On 04/20/2012 10:46 AM, cornel panceac wrote:
One of the things that sounds interesting in the new fedora is gnome-boxes.
However, every
attempt i've made to boot a live cd (tiny core linux) in gnome-boxes, failed
(nothing in
journal). I've figured that i can try this also in qemu and so i
On 04/12/2012 06:59 PM, David Lehman wrote:
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 11:08 +0530, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
On 04/12/2012 06:41 AM, David Lehman wrote:
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 11:08 +0530, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
I'm going give it a try w/ btrfs partitioning. Meanwhile, I wasn't
keeping up. Can
On 04/12/2012 06:41 AM, David Lehman wrote:
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 11:08 +0530, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
I'm going give it a try w/ btrfs partitioning. Meanwhile, I wasn't keeping
up. Can someone
confirm, does /boot still need to be ext3/ext4 for btrfs to work?
Ok, I gave it a try w
Kashyap Chamarthy kashy...@fedoraproject.org:
I'm going give it a try w/ btrfs partitioning. Meanwhile, I wasn't keeping
up. Can someone
confirm, does /boot still need to be ext3/ext4 for btrfs to work?
Ok, I gave it a try w/ the below command line, and an error you have not
created
On 04/10/2012 06:03 PM, Karel Volný wrote:
hi,
I know that anaconda is having a bug in terms of installing to
btrfs Partitions and btrfs is generally disabled for now.
Anybody knows if a installation of F17 to btrfs is possible
if it already exists?
I've tried Alpha install, and
I'm going give it a try w/ btrfs partitioning. Meanwhile, I wasn't keeping
up. Can someone
confirm, does /boot still need to be ext3/ext4 for btrfs to work?
Ok, I gave it a try w/ the below command line, and an error you have not
created a
bootloader stage1 target device. This can
On 10/30/2011 06:54 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
Broken dependencies prevent install.
I was not abled to work around by rpm-ing
files in Packages.
I'm assuming you're running 'yum install dogtag-pki' Is that it?
What version of Fedora are you running F15? F16?
Can you paste the
install pki-ca
Just to note that having '389-ds-base' is a pre-requisite for having.
Meanwhile, I'll find
sometime tomm. to give this a shot on latest F-16.
/kashyap
dogtag install via add/remove gui works for the current rel candidate
On 10/31/2011 10:42 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
On 10/30
On 08/24/2011 02:43 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hey, folks. So, another criteria discussion. It came up during Alpha
that we're grievously lacking criteria to ensure kickstart installs
work. So, we should kick that around a bit, I guess...
kickstart is a very broad area; you can write
Hi,
So it's been a few days now with F15 beta, with the sleek Gnome3
installed.(Machine - DELL
Precision T5400). Apart from a few glitches, this looks good.
Now, I'm aware of the 'Consistent-Network-Device-Naming' feature.
Question:
- In the stock F15 install, I don't see an
On 04/26/2011 07:35 PM, James Laska wrote:
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 16:35 +0530, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
Hi,
So it's been a few days now with F15 beta, with the sleek Gnome3
installed.(Machine - DELL
Precision T5400). Apart from a few glitches, this looks good.
Now, I'm aware
On 08/28/2010 06:05 PM, cornel panceac wrote:
2010/8/28 Kashyap Chamarthy kashy...@fedoraproject.org
mailto:kashy...@fedoraproject.org
-
# ln -s /lib/systemd/system/multi-user.target
/etc/systemd/system/default.target)
# ln -sf /lib/systemd
20 matches
Mail list logo
