/fedora/packages/systemd-208-9.fc20.x86_64.rpm'
>
> is it telling me to do something?
>
>
Might be related to this problem:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2013-December/119214.html .
If not, check you have enough disk space for rpms (particularly /var
partiti
Joachim Backes
>>
>>
>>
>> There is similar bug appearing since f20 alphas. But I certainly didn't
>> have in f20 beta.
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014202
>>
>>
>
> I'm up to date with my F20 updates!
>
Cu
On 06.12.2013 04:48, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 12/05/2013 05:49 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>> On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 16:05 +0100, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>>> Are there any chances to have this packages [1] for Fedora 20? I know
>>> it's only about release number b
Are there any chances to have this packages [1] for Fedora 20? I know
it's only about release number but I don't feel comfortable with
packages not targeted at my current system release.
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035257
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
test mailing
On 25.11.2013 23:26, Rich Megginson wrote:
> On 11/25/2013 03:19 PM, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>> Just did yum distro-sync on my FreeIPA server which is on F20 and it
>> refused to start due to directory server error.
>>
>> $ rpm -qa | grep 389
>> 389-ds-base-lib
rv/plugins/libretrocl-plugin.so: undefined symbol:
retrocl_cn_lock
[25/Nov/2013:23:10:07 +0100] - Could not open library
"/usr/lib64/dirsrv/plugins/libretrocl-plugin.so" for plugin Retro
Changelog Plugin
[25/Nov/2013:23:10:07 +0100] - Unable to load plugin "cn=Retro Chan
On 25.11.2013 12:47, poma wrote:
> On 25.11.2013 10:13, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>
>> You know that art is very hard matter [1], right? I don't even want to
>> imagine what people can see there. BTW, it's nice. What kind of license
>> dose it have?
>
>
of license
dose it have?
[1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2013-November/118863.html
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
n, back to my first account. It
doesn't matter if I log out or just switch. I'm using SSSD and all this
accounts are not local but in IPA database (in case it matters). I can
workaround this issue doing similar thing as OP but nicely - systemctl
restart gdm.service :-) System logs doesn'
ent wrong in your installation. NATed networking is created
and enabled on F20 by default. Personally I hate this, I don't use it
and always disable it but as Adam mentioned there are a lot of different
use cases and user's needs.
I don't thing there are any missing packages related to virtualization
now in Fedora 20. This is a false trail.
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 19.11.2013 04:52, Richard Michael wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Mateusz Marzantowicz
> mailto:mmarzantow...@osdf.com.pl>> wrote:
>
> On 19.11.2013 01:13, Richard Michael wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've j
one has other suggestions or comments?
>
>
> 2/ I'm new to virt-manager and wondering about a work-around; should I
> investigate using virsh to create the interface hoping virt-manager
> will detect it?
>
My work-around: Create bridge in NetworkManager (or directly edit confi
On 19.11.2013 00:58, Eric Blake wrote:
> [adding upstream libvirt, as this topic seems to be getting hot lately]
>
> On 11/18/2013 04:34 PM, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>> KMV/QEMU guest are not shut down properly during host shutdown
>> procedure. One of 3 running virtual ma
On 19.11.2013 00:46, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 00:44 +0100, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>> On 19.11.2013 00:41, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 00:34 +0100, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>>>> KMV/QEMU guest are not shut down
On 19.11.2013 00:41, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 00:34 +0100, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>> KMV/QEMU guest are not shut down properly during host shutdown
>> procedure. One of 3 running virtual machines needs about 20-30 seconds
>> to power off but whole h
.
# cat /etc/sysconfig/libvirt-guests
ON_SHUTDOWN=shutdown
PARALLEL_SHUTDOWN=0
SHUTDOWN_TIMEOUT=300
Thanks for any suggestions,
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 13.11.2013 22:34, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>> atlas.x86_64 3.8.4-8.fc19 @fedora
> The package maintainer has not pushed any Fedora 20 updates. Please file
> a bug against this package requesting an F20 update s
update those packages to fc20 version or it's not
a problem to have them installed?
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
mounted in /hmoe or somewhere else. Is it possible to have auto
complete or drop-down list with most popular mount points?
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
la.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512206
Searching for "net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-iptables" should give you more
holistic view about this issue.
I'm not convinced anyone is working on this bug because it has CLOSED
status, maybe someone kowledgeable from RH or Fedora community
ing I am missing here?
>
You're not missing anything. It is a BUG not resolved to this day. There
is a workaround that works perfectly for me and maybe others. Create
file /etc/NetworkManager/dispatcher.d/00-sysctl with following content:
#!/bin/sh
/usr/lib/systemd/systemd-sysctl
exit 0
M
On 14.10.2013 10:43, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 09:57:20PM +0200, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>> systemd-tmpfiles[215]: chmod(/var/log/journal) failed: Permission denied
>>
>> Is it known bug or should I report it? I can't find any similar bug
>>
On 11.10.2013 22:48, Lawrence Graves wrote:
> The rpmfusion rpg keys will not install in Fedora 20 Beta TC2
> --
> All things are workable but don't all things work. Prov. 3:5 & 6
>
>
http://rpmfusion.org/ReportingBugs
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
test mailing list
test
I have this line in my logs (presented in red):
systemd-tmpfiles[215]: chmod(/var/log/journal) failed: Permission denied
Is it known bug or should I report it? I can't find any similar bug
report in bugzilla.
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.o
eople need network independent install media
which must be as small as possible but still useful.
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
es that are shipped with Fedora?
Is there any tag in RPM package spec file that could be used to provide
such information and are you planning to extend package descriptions so
people can easily find upstream bug tracker URLs?
Are there any plans to provide central information point (wiki, etc.)
wit
InterfaceNames/
> try on the kernel line net.ifnames=0
> or add to /etc/default/grub
> GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX= "some other stuff net.ifnames=0"
> grub2-install /boot/grub2/grub.cfg
>
Shouldn't be grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg?
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 02.07.2013 12:34, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 07/02/2013 05:30 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Mateusz Marzantowicz
> > wrote:
> >> What can I do with this bugs? ABRT says it could not send bug
> report due
> >> to insuff
85 e4 0f 84 24 01 00 00 49 63 46 20 4d 8b 06 41 f6 c0 0f <49> 8b
1c 04 0f 85 4e 01 00 00 48 8d 4a 01 4c 89 e0 65 49 0f c7
RIP [] kmem_cache_alloc+0x68/0x200
RSP
CR2: 002e0121
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedora
ny plans
to fix it (make it work again)?
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
ub-spoke" model in Anaconda is
not so awesome idea as it seemed to be. I'm not saying that old wizard
was better than this new UI but certainly, new hub-spoke model needs
very careful design and naming. For me it was also surprising that I'm
done with partitioning before I've even
must have grub on each of hard drives. Previously I did it by hand from
command line but why this feature couldn't be supported in GUI?
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 22.05.2013 01:21, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 22:54 +0200, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>> Is it possible to disable this "feature"? It might be funny when you are
>> 10 years old, new Linux user and just gotten your first computer from
>> yo
On 21.05.2013 23:28, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
> On 21.05.2013 23:13, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 22:54 +0200, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>>> Is it possible to disable this "feature"? It might be funny when you are
>>> 10 years old, new
On 21.05.2013 23:13, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 22:54 +0200, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>> Is it possible to disable this "feature"? It might be funny when you are
>> 10 years old, new Linux user and just gotten your first computer from
>> yo
me
because I had to wait about 5 secs. before video loaded and was
uncertain if my freshly installed box hanged with White Screen of
Death). What is most important - it is wasting users time.
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedor
On 21.05.2013 21:43, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 21:41 +0200, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>> On 21.05.2013 21:36, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 21:35 +0200, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>>>> Is it a bug or intentional design? In
On 21.05.2013 21:36, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 21:35 +0200, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>> Is it a bug or intentional design? In Anaconda, when you create root
>> password it is not checked for complexity but password for regular user
>> account is.
> U
Is it a bug or intentional design? In Anaconda, when you create root
password it is not checked for complexity but password for regular user
account is.
This is F19 Beta RC2 netinstall.
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https
ght
encounter this bug because it's not so rare to make coffee when your
system boots up. Then you miss this time window to enter the password
and ? F*, my system is broken again. I don't believe all Fedora
users are sysadmins or geeks smart enough to take this kid of
On 08.01.2013 17:55, David Lehman wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 11:35 +0100, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>> So, I think now it is time to ask for help. I've been unable to
>> reproduce specific partition layout for 3 day in new F18 that I have
>> created in F17 without a
ow
new Fedora's name convention) including root, home, var and swap are
located on LVM logical volumes (on one vg). The last vg is left for kvm
so during installation it might be left empty.
Is it possible to do such partitioning during F18 installation?
Mateusz Marzantowicz
-
your system when you hit dependency
error you can use --skip-broken yum command line argument.
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
t; /dev/sda8 105732188 10614892 89746368 11% /
>
> That's ok.
>
> Anybody sees this too?
>
Yes, I'm. I haven't noticed that earlier but now I can confirm that /
(root) is not on the list produced by df.
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 11.12.2012 18:13, Richard Ryniker wrote:
> Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote on Tue, 11 Dec
> 2012 07:15:57 +0100
>
>> Maybe there should be two groups of packages: important (core or
>> whatever) that must be installed and other (not important) that might
>> fail to inst
mputer without
any idea what happened. If you continue installation, you can fix this
later.
Maybe there should be two groups of packages: important (core or
whatever) that must be installed and other (not important) that might
fail to install?
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
our error looks very familiar but it might be because of how
applications written in Python crash when they try to invoke method of
nonexistent object.
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
any usability gain here. Choosing only devices
that you want to partition, reduces number of things/partitions you must
deal with or you can accidentally corrupt.
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
playing with
anaconda. But there might be some cases where you don't want to lose all
your existing data. If you have dedicated disk just zero MBR and make
anaconda think it's fresh empty disk.
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
ion that the term 'cryptoconda' seems somewhat apropos
> to my failed attempt to install to a pre-existing LUKS encrypted partition]
>
I've successfully installed Fedora 18 beta from netinstall image on
encrypted partition with LVM volumes for /, /home and swap. Surprisingly
the
ion types,
file systems, LVM's, raids, etc. but regular user is dead by now.
Maybe it's possible to measure time spend by user in each spoke? This
kind of feedback might help to improve something in the next Fedora release.
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 24.11.2012 19:27, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 11:18 -0500, Scott Robbins wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 05:08:11PM +0100, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>>
>>> One more, question related to setting up hostname in Fedora 18. What is
>>> a R
. What is
a RH approved way of setting this in Fedora 18? There is hostname
command, hostnamectl command, /etc/hostname file more files in etc
related to host name and it could be set in GNOME prefs. No one seems to
work reliably so pleas tell me one authorized and final way of doing this.
Mateusz
Sorry, maybe it's obvious but where can I find list of changes made
between TC8 and TC9 releases? I've had some issues with anaconda and
don't know if anything has changed from tc8 to tc9.
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To uns
know if it could be done during compile time of kernel/drivers or
must be set explicitly like I did it. I think lot of people will be
happy to hear that GPU fan isn't so noisy.
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
looks fine. If this 98% CPU time consumption lasts
for short time you have nothing to worry about.
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
m to find out what it is?
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Antonio
>
>
> GET FREE SMILEYS FOR YOUR IM & EMAIL - Learn more at
> http://www.inbox.com/smileys
> Works with AIM®, MSN® Messenger, Yahoo!
On 16.09.2012 14:08, M A Young wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Sep 2012, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>
>> When selecting keyboard layout, there is a list with two options (only
>> if another language has been selected): English (US) and another layout
>> provided based on language
all because I've already selected my language which has
it's associated keyboard layout different than en US.
2) I can't change the order of items on the list using "up" button. Only
down button works.
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.
On 13.09.2012 22:02, David Lehman wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 15:00 +0200, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>> Hey!
>>
>> I've been playing with new Anaconda since Alpha RC2 and I have some
>> doubts about whole concept of this sub pages with configuration options
&
On 13.09.2012 17:19, Lars Seipel wrote:
> On Thursday 13 September 2012 15:00:06 Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>
>> Please, don't tell me that this is because configuration could be done
>> in parallel and it's for my convenience and to give me the choice which
>>
of
instability and is not intuitive.
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
m using 4.1.22 now and it happens a lot.
> The workaround I've found is to turn off "mouse pointer integration" and
> deal with the
> click to capture behaviour.
I can confirm this strange behavior in KVM/Qemu virtual machines. It
looks like there is a problem with Fedora 18 and not virtualization
environment.
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
e to manage my system without root
>> account? I
>> assume that it's mandatory to be in admin group to be able to use
>> sudo.
>> Am I right?
>>
>>
>> Mateusz Marzantowicz
> You are right. Reported:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=85619
to admin
group which is not checked by default.
If I leave this option unchecked, so there is no user with admin
privileges, how am I suppose to manage my system without root account? I
assume that it's mandatory to be in admin group to be able to use sudo.
Am I right?
Mateusz Marzantow
On 05.09.2012 19:07, A S Alam wrote:
> ਬੁੱਧਵਾਰ 05 ਸਤੰਬਰ 2012 03:48 ਸ਼ਾਮ ਨੂੰ, Mateusz Marzantowicz ਨੇ ਲਿਖਿਆ:
>> Is there a single place for reporting translation issues in Fedora 18 or
>> should I contact each project separately?
>
>
> 1) if there are many issues specific
Is there a single place for reporting translation issues in Fedora 18 or
should I contact each project separately?
Is it possible to release (through update channel) new package version
in Fedora just because of changes in translated messages?
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
test mailing list
test
on of the cursor above the place I'd like to change.
Is there any way to make editing grub menu entries during boot easier?
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
can't quite remember where -
> can anyone help out? Definitely something we should check into. It may
> be the case that if you ensure you have the latest dracut and then
> re-install the kernel it might work better?
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2012-July/10
Adam Williamson:
> On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 09:07 +0200, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>
>> I've played just with Fedora 17 beta Live for a while and it looks like
>> everything is working out of the box. I'm beginning to think the problem
>> was cause by updates o
Mateusz Marzantowicz:
> Adam Williamson:
>> On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 10:10 +0200, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm unable to setup my Fedora 17 boxes (I have one real and one virtual
>>> machine) to work as samba client in graph
Adam Williamson:
> On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 10:10 +0200, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm unable to setup my Fedora 17 boxes (I have one real and one virtual
>> machine) to work as samba client in graphical mode (gnome shell/nautilus).
>>
>>
looks like everything works except samba via nautilus. Is there
anything I can do to simply browse and use my network shares form Fedora 17?
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
73 matches
Mail list logo
