I just discovered something odd that explains why umask isn't
getting set for the user (me).
Traditionally (I researched countless sites about the proper
place for things and, as I said, it has always worked in the
past, right up until F26), umask is supposed to be in
bash_profile.
However, I
Adam Williamson wrote:
> So I wouldn't assume that any of the discussion is at
> all relevant until you've at least established that someone
made a
> conscious decision to make some part of KDE not respect
those files any
> more. It's just as likely, or more likely, to be a
straightforward
> mi
Peter Gueckel wrote:
> Gordon Messmer wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F25_bugs#GNOME_Wayland_session_does_not_start_a_login_shell.2C_so_does_not_process_.bash_profile_or_.bashrc_etc.
I had a look... quite an interesting discussion. I need to
take it in in pieces ;-)
I agree t
Gordon Messmer wrote:
> Are you talking about ssh or terminal login sessions, or
graphical
> logins under Wayland?
Graphical logins under Kwin on X11. When I ctrl-alt-fx to
another virtual terminal (non-graphical) and log in (I just
tried it this very minute), it works as it is supposed to and
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> Is this from an application running from:
>
> * A desktop session? (Which one? And what display manager?)
A desktop session, Plasma/KDE, GDM display manager, kwin
window manager
> * A terminal window opened from within a desktop session?
(Which terminal
> progr
In ~/.bash_profile, I have umask=022, since I want directories
(files) to have the permission 755 (644).
Until Fedora 25, this worked perfectly.
Now, in Fedora 26, directories (files) are created with the
permission 775 (664).
When I run umask, it returns 0002.
For some reason, my setting
Is working WiFi going to be a requirement for Fedora 26?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435793
I sure hope so. This morning's kernel has done nothing.
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi folks! At today's blocker review meeting, a couple of
bugs came up
> where we thought it would be hel
I had the 'gah' message *once* when I was using Firefox 52,
but since upgrading to Firefox 53, I have not not experienced
it at all.
[It was a big problem in Fedora 25, though.]
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi folks! At today's blocker review meeting, a couple of
bugs came up
> where we thought i
I have done that and I am happy to report that, with the new kernel 4.5.5-300
this bug is resolved to my complete satisfaction :-)
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> After bit of irc discussion there is a compelling reason to move
> entirely away from Red Hat bugzilla as well as away from concept of
> hosting our own.
I don't chant that mantra.
I am a Fedora consumer, not a maintainer or programmer. My bug reports
to bugzilla
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Guided partitioning (non-custom) does not destroy any existing
> partitions or data unless you explicitly request it. If you just
used
> 'Reclaim Space' you could choose to delete only whatever
partitions you
> don't need.
I don't have any unpartitioned space. I just ov
Andre Robatino wrote:
> As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Final Test Compose 2
(TC2)
> is now available for testing.
I just tried it. It doesn't work :{(
I had the same problem as with the alpha release.
During the selection of the drive/partition to install to, I select
the drive
Joachim Backes wrote:
> See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924681
Noted :-)
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
I just updated the system.
There was a curious message:
Error unpacking rpm package espeak-1.47.01-1.fc18.x86_64
error: unpacking of archive failed on file /usr/share/espeak-
data/voices/en: cpio: rename
error: espeak-1.47.01-1.fc18.x86_64: install failed
Is this significant?
--
test mailing l
Tom Horsley wrote:
> Not only did the autohint file move to
> /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/10-autohint.conf,
> but the content changed as well.
> Instead of a symlink, I made a copy and changed the
> "append" operation to "assign", and suddenly the
> scales fell from my eyes! I could see agai
No need to comment. Just want to pass on experience to those up the
ladder.
1. Stupid 20-minute pause (waiting for a timeout?) before the
installation got underway.
2. My Intel ipw2200 wireless simply works! One configuration at
install time and it works for every boot. Wow!
3. I wasn't sure
Felix Miata wrote:
> Is there any other UI on the planet where
> where a done or OK button is at the upper left?
I guess you're not a KDE user ;-)
SystemSettings has a button with a back arrow, which effectively has
the same function as the 'done' button -- in the upper left corner!
--
test m
Frank Murphy wrote:
> You can't report without having a bz account
I know. I have one.
> you can modify what mails you receive.
> I think you need to go here:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Those are global settings.
There are cases where you are the reporter, but do not
Sometimes someone says: "You should report xxx to bugzilla."
If you do, you end up getting emails and may be contacted and are
unable to get yourself off the list, because you reported it.
How can one report something without being on the list?
PS: Obviously, I want to receive correspondence an
Karel Volný wrote:
> Dne Čt 29. listopadu 2012 09:37:10, Peter
Gueckel napsal(a):
>> The kmail question is that after setup, I
>> notice that there is no trash folder. One
can
>> delete messages to a trash folder and they
>> disappear, but there is no folder, so one
Adam Williamson wrote:
> less pointless arguing
:-)
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> On 11/30/2012 01:00 AM, Peter Gueckel
wrote:
>> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>>
>>> However KDE questions (even for F18) can
>> alternatively go
>>> to the KDE-Fedora list, but not cross-
>> posted please. I see you
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> However KDE questions (even for F18) can
alternatively go
> to the KDE-Fedora list, but not cross-
posted please. I see you've
> already posted there.
That list is DEAD! There is not activity on
it.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
I installed Fedora 18ß on both of my
computers. A horrible long wait for about 20
minutes before anything happened. When it
finally started, a message about
/etc/commandline or somethinglike that flew
past.
Other than that, anaconda is excellent and it
is a beautiful piece of work!
The kmai
Adam Williamson wrote:
> So far, seven people
:-)
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
upda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> colord-gtk-0.1.22-1.fc17
Hasn't anyone noticed that colord-gtk-0.1.22-1.fc17 will not install, because
it
conflicts with colord-0.1.21-1.fc17.x86_64?
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/li
Non-fatal POSTUN scriptlet failure in rpm package
1:NetworkManager-0.9.4.0-8.git20120502.fc17.x86_64
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.LIDIm9: line 6: syntax error near unexpected token `fi'
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.LIDIm9: line 6: `fi'
warning: %postun(NetworkManager-1:0.9.4.0-8.git20120502.fc17.x86_64) scriptlet
fai
Matej Cepl wrote:
> Adobe now supports both x86_64 as well as i686 flash-plugin...
I have always used the 64-bit version, even when there were only test zip files.
> nspluginwrapper is not needed for covering 32bit for 64bit Firefox anymore.
I had not heard until now.
> Also since somewhere in t
Peter Gueckel wrote:
I just uninstalled nspluginwrapper (I could have unwrapped
flash, I suppose) and now it works.
However, I have run flash wrapped for years and, now, with
firefox 12 or some selinux update of a couple of days ago,
it no longer works.
--
test mailing list
test
Peter Gueckel wrote:
> as soon as I so much as scroll the mouse to centre the
> player window or even just try to click the play button,
it
> just whites out and is gone.
Correction: as soon as I click the play button, it whites
out and a white area remains where the player is suppos
Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 04/28/2012 12:15 PM, Peter Gueckel wrote:
>> Since about 2-3 days, coinciding with the release of
firefox
>> 12, I think, the adobe flash plugin crashes in firefox
>> only this site appears to be affected:
>>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/thenati
My system is up-to-date with updates-testing.
Since about 2-3 days, coinciding with the release of firefox
12, I think, the adobe flash plugin crashes in firefox, but
it runs in konqueror, but only this site appears to be
affected:
http://www.cbc.ca/thenational/watch/
Youtube works.
--
test
Adam Williamson wrote:
> At the user level it's pretty simple: it's a modern replacement for
> BIOS. It's an entirely new system firmware standard for PCs.
>
> The most user-noticeable features of UEFI are probably secure boot
> (which has been discussed ad infinitum: the important thing here is
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Could you try one?
I have to pay when I go over my monthly GB download limit.
> [EFI]'s a system firmware level thing.
That's what I thought, but, having googled it numerous times, it seems to be
quite mysterious, still, and straight answers are hard to come by.
--
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Do early 17 DVDs work for you? Have you tried?
This is the first Fedora 17 disk I have tried.
> The 17 Beta TCs should still be available at stage/, and the
> Alpha is of course available 'officially'.
I didn't bother with any of the alphas. Particularly, because of the
Peter Gueckel wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>> Did you checksum it?
>
> No, I know I should have, but I didn't. I was too lazy to check.
>
OK. I finally bothered to checksum it and it is OK.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Did you checksum it?
No, I know I should have, but I didn't. I was too lazy to check.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
stan wrote:
> Overall assessment - a smooth and positive experience.
I downloaded the Beta Release Candidate 1 and just tried to install it to a
spare partition.
This is what happened:
The computer booted, read the DVD, said it would boot it in 3 seconds, then a
message appeared in the upper
Adam Williamson wrote:
> No, that sounds like exactly the bug discussed above, and I would bet
> dollars to donuts you got an update to 'at' at the same time as you got
> an update to the kernel. The 'at' update fixes the bug.
Yes, that is correct. Along with the kernal was at-3.1.13-5.fc16.
Tha
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 06:25 -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
>> On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 05:50 -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
>>
>> > On a recently installed system running rawhide I notice that this is
>> > not working for me. I click "suspend", my network drops...it looks
>> > hopeful
Dave Jones wrote:
> What graphics card ?
Intel Mobile 915GM/GMS/910GML Express
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Dave Jones wrote:
> well the good thing is that the machine is still alive when it comes back,
> so you should have log files showing what happened on resume.
OK. I already turned it off. I hope the relevant information in the log files
will still be there when I turn it on again, which will pro
I powered up my laptop. The kdm screen was there, but I did not log in. After
some time, perhaps 20-30 minutes, I was ready to log in. The screen was black,
but that occurs after idle, so no problem, just wiggle the mouse. Nothing
happened. The screen stayed black. I know the password field was
Mike Chambers wrote:
> Seems to be the fix, thanks.
>
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Tom H wrote:
> If you set "GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR=Fedora" in "/etc/default/grub", you'll
> have "Fedora Linux, with Linux ..." in your grub menu.
Thanks. I made the change. Next kernel, I will see it in action. This will look
much better.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscr
Why does the grub2 menu entry list Fedora like this:
Linux, with Linux 3.1.0-0.rc6.git0.3.fc16.x86_64?
Instead of like this:
Fedora 16, with Linux 3.1.0-0.rc6.git0.3.fc16.x86_64?
While os-prober finds other Fedoras on other partitions and shows them like
this
(yes, I have 2 partititions with
Joachim Backes wrote:
> I had pulseaudio problems too, and I could get rid of them by updating
> to kernel-3.1.0-0.rc6.git0.0.fc16.x86_64 (the buggy kernel was rc5).
That is another possibility. I have noticed that, while rc5 works on this
computer, it does not boot on my laptop.
--
test maili
Peter Gueckel wrote:
> I have noticed that pulseaudio uses upwards of 16% CPU and when I start
> krunner to investigate, I see that there are often numerous pulseaudio
> processes all running simultaneously, but greyed out. And this, while I am
> not even using any applications tha
I have noticed that pulseaudio uses upwards of 16% CPU and when I start krunner
to investigate, I see that there are often numerous pulseaudio processes all
running simultaneously, but greyed out. And this, while I am not even using any
applications that emit sound!
It is so bad, that the mouse
Try it! It's edible and nutritious :-)
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Tom Horsley wrote:
> I very shortly got a popup with the title "kded - KDialog"
> saying something about ~/.kde/share/config/kdedrc not
> being writable.
I don't know what causes it, but it often is the case, after freshly
installing or updating kde to a new version, that these "not writeable"
Peter Gueckel wrote:
> Joachim Backes wrote:
>> Anybody has the same issue?
> Any ideas how to get grub installed properly...?
Many hours of work, my desktop computer is back. I don't care to do that
agian (and don't ask me what I did, because I couldn't
Adam Williamson wrote:
> so if you have anaconda installed, you can
probably
> just remove it, remove fcoe-utils and
lldpad, and be happy.
I installed from alive CD, so I think that is
why anaconda is installed, and hence, with
it, as you said, all of the other stuff.
I will uninstall as per
Joachim Backes wrote:
> after each kernel update I burn a boot cd
Explain how you do this!
It wastes a lot of CDs, but saves a lot of
wasted time trying to rescue a system.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Joachim Backes wrote:
> Anybody has the same issue?
Yes, please HELP! :-)
I am unable to boot my desktop computer. I
just get a grub rescue command prompt and no
grub commands except set seem to be
recognized. I cannot boot into Fedora 15 or
Fedora 16 alpha.
I am trying to fix by running th
what is this lldpad daemonand why does it run
continually for days on end without ever
terminating and consume up to 65% of my
laptop's cpu?
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
56 matches
Mail list logo
