Re: proposal: remove "opportunity to carry out other desirable work" from the Exceptional Cases considerations in the blocker bug SOP

2020-10-22 Thread Sudhir D
+1 to the proposal. On 10/21/20 11:37 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: In https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process#Exceptional_cases, there is a list of factors we may consider when dealing with last minute or difficult to resolve blockers. One item on the list is: * Whether delaying

Re: Fedora 30 updates-testing report

2020-05-10 Thread Sudhir D
On 5/10/20 12:35 PM, upda...@fedoraproject.org wrote: 304https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-c05e4425d1 dash-0.5.10.2-3.fc30 This issue is lingering around for long now. Status of BZ#1691825 is ON_QA which does not se

Re: 'No More Alphas': wiki revision drafts

2017-08-22 Thread Sudhir D
On 08/22/2017 07:34 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 07:18:04PM +0530, Sudhir D wrote: On a slightly different thought, if we run all existing Alpha criteria tests in rawhide, we can then probably look at existing Alpha blocker as Branch blocker.. i.e, we don't branch u

Re: 'No More Alphas': wiki revision drafts

2017-08-22 Thread Sudhir D
On 08/03/2017 05:46 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: * My proposal for 'what do we do about release criteria / validation' is basically: the 'Fedora 27 Alpha Release Criteria' page gets renamed 'Basic Release Criteria' (note: not versioned, I don't think it should be), and we document that *all* comp

Re: On vacation for a couple of weeks

2016-07-18 Thread Sudhir D
On 07/13/2016 01:29 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: pschindl has done those when I've been away before, so he might be OK with picking it up again, or if anyone else would like to try that's fine. We'd only need a compose request if there's something we want to test that requires a compose but whic

Re: Requiring package test instructions

2016-07-13 Thread Sudhir D
On 07/13/2016 08:17 AM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: But then we're setting the bar too low by allowing *anyone* to set karma for the sake of it. You might as well just let developers push packages to stable if they're 'confident' about it. That is painting with too broad of a brush for one or

[New Members] Welcome and things to keep in mind.

2016-07-04 Thread Sudhir D
Hello to all new members! You are guaranteed to have exciting time working with and testing Fedora. Enjoy the journey :) There are some basic guidelines while responding on mailing list that is in-place for best and effective communication. You can find them @ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/

Re: Non-image blocker process change proposal

2015-11-20 Thread Sudhir D
On 11/19/2015 11:40 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 19:09 +0530, Sudhir D wrote: I suggest we have only one ZeroDay i.e., for Final and do away with intermediate ones. As I see it, ZeroDay comes with cost and we also need to have basic sanity testcases automated to ensure

Re: Non-image blocker process change proposal

2015-11-19 Thread Sudhir D
On 11/19/2015 06:06 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: Hi, folks! It's been a recurring issue in the blocker review / release validation process in recent times that we run across bugs that qualify as blockers, but for which the fix does not need to be in the final frozen media or install trees. Commo

Re: Proposed new blocking criterion for Fedora Server: GSSAPI SSO via SSH

2015-10-05 Thread Sudhir D
On 10/06/2015 12:35 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Currently, we have a number of blocking criterion in Fedora Server around domain membership that the machine must be able to join a domain and that a user must be able to log into the machine using s

Re: Alpha Criterion Discussion: Desktop Backgrounds

2015-08-09 Thread Sudhir D
On 08/07/2015 10:41 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Fri, 07 Aug 2015 10:03:34 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: This is exactly what I *don't* want to happen, and what rather annoys me about this whole business. The blocker process is not a tool for the rest of the project to use as a reminder system.

Re: QA talks at Flock

2015-05-06 Thread Sudhir D
On 05/01/2015 03:01 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: I was considering proposing a session which would just cover the 'new bits' we've put in place since F21 - the revisions to the validation test process (including relval/wikitcms), openQA, and some of the taskotron stuff (as the taskotron session i

Re: Fedora QA subproject status report for council (in June)

2015-04-21 Thread Sudhir D
On 04/20/2015 11:18 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: Whoo, beta is (almost) out the door — time for congratulations and thanks to all of the QA team (and hopefully a nice deep breath). I'm looking at planning future meetings for the Fedora Council, and one thing we'd like to have is regular status rep