Re: conflict between latest fedora-release and systemd (rawhide)

On 06/10/2015 10:51 PM, Kevin Martin wrote: > On 05/22/2015 10:52 PM, Kevin Martin wrote: >> On 05/22/2015 04:53 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >>> On Fri, 22 May 2015 16:50:19 -0500 >>> kevin martin wrote: >>> >>> ...snip... >>> >>>> &

Re: conflict between latest fedora-release and systemd (rawhide)

On 05/22/2015 10:52 PM, Kevin Martin wrote: > On 05/22/2015 04:53 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> On Fri, 22 May 2015 16:50:19 -0500 >> kevin martin wrote: >> >> ...snip... >> >>> >>> Looks like somebody decided to move the 90-default.preset fro

Re: conflict between latest fedora-release and systemd (rawhide)

On 05/22/2015 04:53 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 22 May 2015 16:50:19 -0500 > kevin martin wrote: > > ...snip... > >> >> Looks like somebody decided to move the 90-default.preset from >> systemd to the fedora-release package without changing the syste

Re: conflict between latest fedora-release and systemd (rawhide)

age systemd-219-13.fc23.x86_64 Error Summary - Looks like somebody decided to move the 90-default.preset from systemd to the fedora-release package without changing the systemd package to reflect that and pushing out a new package (as discussed about a year ago). Kevin On Fri, May 22,

conflict between latest fedora-release and systemd (rawhide)

Just an FYI, the latest rawhide update gives an error about usr/lib/systemd/system-preset/90-default.preset conflicting between the .13 version of fedora-release and systemd. Regards, Kevin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/

Re: On/Off problems

On 11/20/2014 09:05 AM, Lawrence E Graves wrote: > There is no log to test the results of this but my computer or laptop > running Fedora 21 Beta RC4 will not shutdown or restart. If > this is my fault, please let me know what to do to fix this problem. If it is > not my fault, I guessing I am r

Re: Big problems with the lpr or lp command in F21 since some days: only empty sheets are printed: More details

-Original Message- From: Joachim Backes To: Fedora-test Sent: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 7:06 AM Subject: Re: Big problems with the lpr or lp command in F21 since some days: only empty sheets are printed: More details On 10/29/2014 12:22 PM, Joachim Backes wrote: > Dear F21 testers, > > having

Re: can someone suggest why firefox is so &$*&^%*#^&%* slow?

On 09/24/2014 09:49 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Wed, 24 Sep 2014, Kevin Martin wrote: > >> On 09/24/2014 09:44 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: >>> >>> i am at my wit's end with firefox on my fedora rawhide system -- to >>> say it's nad-grind

Re: can someone suggest why firefox is so &$*&^%*#^&%* slow?

On 09/24/2014 09:44 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > i am at my wit's end with firefox on my fedora rawhide system -- to > say it's nad-grindingly slow would be charitable. just now, i tried > clicking on another tab ... some 30 seconds later, i am still waiting > for the tab to change, oh, wait,

yum error during update (Fatal Error TypeError)

yum clean all doesn't help, I'll start with that. The following error occurred with yum update today: Running transaction check Running transaction test TypeError: an integer is required FATAL ERROR: python callback > failed, aborting! I saw this yesterday as well so decided to try to update ea

jackson-annotations update problem via yum

When trying to update jackson-annotations via yum I continue to receive the following errors: http://mirrors.mit.edu/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/x86_64/os/Packages/j/jackson-annotations-2.4.1-1.fc21.noarch.rpm: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 416 - Requested Range Not Satisfiable Trying other mirror.

Re: Consistent names changed yet again?

On 08/06/2014 09:32 AM, Scott Robbins wrote: > On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 02:38:30PM +0200, Adam Williamson wrote: >> >> In Fedora 21 we've more or less dropped biosdevname in favour of >> systemd. systemd's system is a cleaner implementation and the weight of >> opinion favours the systemd approach t

Re: Consistent names changed yet again?

On 08/06/2014 07:08 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Wed, 6 Aug 2014 07:55:55 -0400 > Matthew Miller wrote: > >> "consistent on the same machine for a given OS release, >> _across any possible hardware changes_" > > Maybe, but I know I watched the interface names change > just because a new version of

dnf errors that yum doesn't get...

broken packages/dependency issues? -- Regards, ---- Kevin Martin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: dnf cache is very large....

On 07/16/2014 12:26 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Kevin Martin wrote: > > > I assume this is not planned nor correct (since my yum cache is much > smaller) but can't seem to clear it out with any of the dnf > commands.  How can I clear this up

dnf cache is very large....

;t seem to clear it out with any of the dnf commands. How can I clear this up gracefully? -- Regards, -------- Kevin Martin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

dnf errors or kernel* rpm problems?

dnf upgrade doesn't show an error while updating the kernel packages but there are missing entries in grub2.conf after an upgrade that should be for the new kernel that was downloaded and, supposedly, installed. If I attempt a dnf reinstall of the kernel and related rpms then I get the following

todays dnf kernel update gives conflicts again....

-3.16.0-0.rc0.git11.1.fc21.x86_64 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-3.15.0-0.rc8.git1.2.fc21.x86_64 -- Regards, Kevin Martin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: kernel-headers for 3.15 rc8 conflict with kernel-headers-3.15.0-0.rc7.git0.1.fc21.x86_64

On 06/05/2014 02:30 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 13:25 -0500, Kevin Martin wrote: >> Today while doing a dnf upgrade I got a conflict message about the >> kernel-headers for 3.15 rc8 conflicting with 3.15 rc7.git0.1. I >> was forced to rpm -e the rc7 h

kernel-headers for 3.15 rc8 conflict with kernel-headers-3.15.0-0.rc7.git0.1.fc21.x86_64

Today while doing a dnf upgrade I got a conflict message about the kernel-headers for 3.15 rc8 conflicting with 3.15 rc7.git0.1. I was forced to rpm -e the rc7 headers (with --nodeps) to be able to install the rc8 versions and allow the whole set of necessary kernel packages to install so grub2

Re: kernel-3.15 series fail to load gnome desktop

On 04/19/2014 12:02 PM, Tom London wrote: > On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Tom London > wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel > mailto:clydekunkel7...@verizon.net>> wrote: > > On Sat, 19 Apr 2014 12:45:10 -0400 > "Clyde E. Ku

Re: Modesetting failure with kernel 3.15; ok with kernel 3.14

On 04/17/2014 01:48 PM, Steven Usdansky wrote: > failed with error -22 I probably should have asked this before but are you using the nouveau or nvidia driver? And did you modprobe as root? Kevin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m

Re: Modesetting failure with kernel 3.15; ok with kernel 3.14

On 04/17/2014 01:26 PM, Steven Usdansky wrote: > Not sure where to report this problem (or what I should be looking for), but > when booting any of the 3.15 kernels, > kernel-modesetting fails and X comes up with a resolution of 1024x768, > rather than the 1680x1050 resolution specified in my >

Re: this mornings kernel rc6 not signed...

On 03/13/2014 09:24 AM, drago01 wrote: > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Kevin Martin wrote: >> Tried to do an update this morning and I get: >> >> Error: Package kernel-3.14.0-0.rc6.git1.1.fc21.x86_64.rpm is not signed >> >> Can somebody please fix this? >

this mornings kernel rc6 not signed...

Tried to do an update this morning and I get: Error: Package kernel-3.14.0-0.rc6.git1.1.fc21.x86_64.rpm is not signed Can somebody please fix this? Kevin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: /var/log/messages is scrambled!

On 02/25/2014 01:44 PM, Neal Becker wrote: > OK, I think there is no question that time did not go back in > /var/log/messages. > Actually, the messages are scrambled. > > First it is Jan 25. Then it it Jan 8. We go through normal looking periods > of > Jan 9 and 10, and Jan 13 before we're

Re: Vmware Workstation won't compile

On 02/14/2014 01:26 PM, Lawrence Graves wrote: > > On 2/14/2014 11:06 AM, Joachim Backes wrote: >> On 02/14/2014 05:06 PM, Lawrence E Graves wrote: >>> kernel-3.13.2-200.fc20.x86_64 >>> kernel-modules-extra-3.12.9-301.fc20.x86_64 >>> kernel-modules-extra-3.12.10-300.fc20.x86_64 >>> kernel-devel-3.

Re: dnf upgrade...some strange errors...

>> >>399/399 >> depmod: ERROR: Module 'hci_vhci' has devname (vhci) but lacks major and >> minor information. Ignoring. >> 05busybox: Could not find command 'busybox'! >> 90multipath: Could not f

dnf upgrade...some strange errors...

Did a dnf upgrade tonight and received these errors just prior to the verifying step: Cleanup : less-458-5.fc21.x86_64 394/399 Cleanup : iw-3.11-1.fc21.x86_64

Seeing this error on bootup with latest 3.14 kernel from rawhide

[0.527306] ACPI: SSDT bf71a918 0003F0 (v01 PmRef Cpu0Ist 3000 INTL 20060912) [0.531169] ACPI: SSDT (null) 0003F0 (v01 PmRef Cpu0Ist 3000 INTL 20060912) [0.533083] ACPI: SSDT bf718018 000891 (v01 PmRef Cpu0Cst 3001 INTL 20060912) [0.5357

Re: yum rawhide failing....

On 12/13/2013 09:17 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 11:52:58 +0100, poma wrote: > >>> Prefer "yum clean metadata" (or just "yum clean expire-cache") over >>> deleting even downloaded/cached packages with "all". >> >> Sí jefe, pero "todos" es tan hermosa. ;) > > "yum clean" with

yum rawhide failing....

Every mirror for yum rawhide is failing at this time for me with 404 not found messages. I see this error as well: One of the configured repositories failed (Fedora - Rawhide - Developmental packages for the next Fedora release), and yum doesn't have enough cached data to continue. Is there a

Re: Fedora 20 broadcast address

On 11/21/2013 09:06 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > > > On 20 November 2013 22:29, Louis Lagendijk <mailto:lo...@fazant.net>> wrote: > > On Wed, 2013-11-20 at 16:21 -0600, Kevin Martin wrote: > > On 11/20/2013 03:21 PM, Louis Lagendijk wrote: >

Re: Fedora 20 broadcast address

On 11/20/2013 03:21 PM, Louis Lagendijk wrote: > Some time ago I asked a question about the broadcast address on Fedora > 20. On my desktop (installed from one of Alpha TC's) the interface is > brought up correctly, except that the broadcast address does not get set > correctly: > Ifconfig reports:

dependency issues with gstreamer1-libav...

ve libraries. -- Regards, ---- Kevin Martin NetFuel, Inc. mailto: kev...@netfuel.com mailto: tech-supp...@netfuel.com U.S.). 312.698.9879 U.K.) 208.150.3609 U.S. Alternate). 847.231.3589 FAX) 866.654.3341 For access to our Software and Documentation please login or register for acce

cronie rpm error

/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.9wvQS9: line 2: fg: no job control error: %preun(cronie-1.4.11-1.fc20.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 1 Error in PREUN scriptlet in rpm package cronie error: cronie-1.4.11-1.fc20.x86_64: erase failed -- Regards, Kevin -- test mailing list test@

Re: A different way of installing Fedora

On 09/25/13 20:38, David wrote: > On 9/25/2013 9:33 PM, Gavin Flower wrote: >> On 26/09/13 13:26, David wrote: >>> On 9/25/2013 9:13 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote: On 09/25/2013 05:45 PM, David wrote: > On 9/25/2013 7:19 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote: >> Several of my machies have

Re: Fedora 20 RC3

On 09/18/13 12:39, Lawrence Graves wrote: > I am not able to connect to my network. Something about dhclient not working. > -- > All things are workable but don't all things work. Prov. 3:5 & 6 > > Lawrence, Have you turned off ipv6 on the kernel line in grub? If you have you need to get that

Re: blackened screen 2

On 09/09/13 13:31, Richard Vickery wrote: > Hi gang: > > I'm on F20. The only way I get a screen that anyone can see is not by > using the portable computer's screen, but plugging it into another > screen. I tried going into the "Power" control but it's already on > maximum brightness. Any Ideas o

LibreOffice 4.1 menu display problem.

I'm using the following package of LibreOffice: Version: 4.1.1.2 Build ID: 4.1.1.2-1.fc21 When I open a file in LO, the menu's don't display properly (only the icons and a - where the words should be). If I grab the window border and drag the window a little, then the menu's display properly,

Re: NetworkManager F20 online but no connnection

On 08/23/13 11:12, Frank Murphy wrote: > I'm on the www, posting this. > NM-Applet show no active connection found? > > ifconfig > eth0: flags=4163 mtu 1500 > inet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx > > dmesg | grep eth > [ 34.491811] r8169 :04:00.0 eth0: RTL8168evl/8111evl at > 0xc9c3c000, 90:2b:34

Re: f19 and nouveau drivers system freeze

1.fc20.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Jul 9 21:34:37 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux". I actually posted a bugzilla yesterday about X crashing when running Mozilla products but perhaps it's more than just that. Kevin Martin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscri

Re: ABRT shows a problem with google-chrome-unstable Google Wallet Service...

On 07/10/13 14:31, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 11:50 -0500, Kevin Martin wrote: > >> Or maybe this from the not-reportable file (a message, by the way, that >> makes no sense at the point where it says "free and Nouveau >> driver"): >&g

Re: ABRT shows a problem with google-chrome-unstable Google Wallet Service...

On 07/09/13 23:03, Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 21:17 -0500, Kevin Martin wrote: >> So how should I report this? Is there some way to force ABRT to >> report this? > > Chrome? I thought ABRT only reports issues for Fedora packages? You may > be able

ABRT shows a problem with google-chrome-unstable Google Wallet Service...

ouveau,videodev wmi18697 3 toshiba_acpi,mxm_wmi,nouveau video 19247 1 nouveau So how should I report this? Is there some way to force ABRT to report this? Thanks. Kevin Martin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To uns

X question...

houghts on what might be causing this. I'm running the latest rawhide kernel and latest X updates, fwiw. -- Regards, -------- Kevin Martin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: p7zip-plugins and rar extraction.

On 04/29/13 15:55, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 04/29/2013 12:54 PM, Kevin Martin wrote >> I'll post a bugzilla but, fwiw, unar worked a treat: >> >> >> $ unar tomato-K26USB-1.28.9054MIPSR2-beta-vpn3.6.rar >> tomato-K26USB-1.28.9054MIPSR2-beta-vpn3.6.rar

Re: p7zip-plugins and rar extraction.

On 04/29/13 11:13, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Kevin Martin wrote: > > On 04/29/13 00:12, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > Hi > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Kevin Martin wrote: > &g

Re: p7zip-plugins and rar extraction.

On 04/29/13 00:12, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > > On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Kevin Martin <mailto:ktm...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > On 04/27/13 18:41, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > Hi > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at

Re: p7zip-plugins and rar extraction.

On 04/27/13 18:41, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > > On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Kevin Martinwrote: > > > > > Hmm, installed updated file-roller and can't unpack a .rar file. Is > there something else that needs to be installed behind it? I > see the error "An error occurred

Re: p7zip-plugins and rar extraction.

On 04/25/13 07:10, drago01 wrote: > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> On 04/25/2013 03:36 AM, drago01 wrote: >>> >>> >>> Does it work with encrypted rar archives? >> >> >> Yes. Encrypted rar archives are supported and I have tested it explicitly >> as well >> >> https://c

Re: p7zip-plugins and rar extraction.

On 04/16/13 15:47, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Kevin Martin said: >> What is the reason that rar archive extraction support is not included in >> the 7z.so in the p7zip-plugins rpm? > > In the p7zip SRPM SPEC file: > ># RAR sources removed since th

p7zip-plugins and rar extraction.

What is the reason that rar archive extraction support is not included in the 7z.so in the p7zip-plugins rpm? -- Regards, Kevin Martin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

evince 3.8.0 cores

%u %g %t e :: /proc/sys/kernel/core_pipe_limit 4 :: /proc/sys/kernel/core_uses_pid 1 Any help greatly appreciated. -- Regards, -------- Kevin Martin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma

Re: lxde menu items causing X crash

On 04/02/13 13:06, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Tue, 2013-04-02 at 12:45 -0500, Kevin Martin wrote: > >> I would happily use the nouveau driver (and was using it until going to the >> 3.8+ kernel where it became virtually >> unusable with noaccel turned on) > > Opti

Re: Rawhide dead slow on my laptop

On 04/08/13 06:52, Ozan Çağlayan wrote: >> Rawhide kernels have debugging options enabled, which can cause >> significant slowdowns in many situations. Try using the >> rawhide-kernel-nodebug repository to get non-debug kernels for Rawhide >> and see if your problems persist: >> http://fedoraproje

Re: lxde menu items causing X crash

On 04/02/13 12:21, Adam Williamson wrote: > On 02/04/13 09:27 AM, Kevin Martin wrote: >> Using lxde with openbox on rawhide and certain menu items under Preferences >> causes the following crash of X: >> >> from process 3610 (kevinm@ktmtoshiba). >> (EE) >>

lxde menu items causing X crash

2215.743] Build ID: xorg-x11-server 1.14.0-3.fc20 [ 2215.743] Current version of pixman: 0.28.0 -- Regards, Kevin Martin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

espeak package update fails

Transaction check error: file /usr/share/espeak-data/voices/en from install of espeak-1.47.01-1.fc20.x86_64 conflicts with file from package espeak-1.46.02-8.fc19.x86_64 -- Regards, Kevin Martin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

rawhide updates giving me errors when removing previous kernels....

/modules.builtin: remove failed: No such file or directory warning: file /lib/modules/3.8.0-1.fc19.x86_64/modules.block: remove failed: No such file or directory This is not the first time this has occurred when removing previous 3.8 kernels. -- Regards, Kevin Martin -- test

Re: This mornings yum update....

On 02/21/13 08:49, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 08:42:56 -0600, Kevin Martin wrote: > >> gives me this error: >> >> Transaction check error: >> file /usr/lib/debug from install of filesystem-3.2-4.fc19.x86_64 conflicts >> with file from pa

This mornings yum update....

, Kevin Martin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: [Rawhide] Re: Just reporting....

On 01/09/13 09:46, Frank Murphy wrote: > On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 09:32:50 -0600 > Kevin Martin wrote: > > > > Just a thought do you have the menu with advanced sub-menu > Maybe you can only edit those in the sub-menu? > If that's what you have. > > So

Re: [Rawhide] Re: Just reporting....

On 01/09/13 09:26, Frank Murphy wrote: > On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 09:11:18 -0600 > Kevin Martin wrote: > >> Been running rawhide for well over a year. The boot editing issue >> has occurred essentially since the anaconda changes. I did a >> reinstall of my system wi

Re: [Rawhide] Re: Just reporting....

On 01/09/13 08:41, Frank Murphy wrote: > On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 08:20:01 -0600 > Kevin Martin wrote: > >> Hasn't worked for quite a while (pretty much ever since they >> updated the grub menu boot time layout). Is the grub boot menu >> stuff in the anaconda pack

Re: [Rawhide] Re: Just reporting....

On 01/09/13 08:20, Kevin Martin wrote: > Hasn't worked for quite a while (pretty much ever since they updated the grub > menu boot time layout). Is the grub boot menu stuff > in the anaconda package? I'm not even sure where to start looking for it. > > Kevin >

Re: [Rawhide] Re: Just reporting....

Hasn't worked for quite a while (pretty much ever since they updated the grub menu boot time layout). Is the grub boot menu stuff in the anaconda package? I'm not even sure where to start looking for it. Kevin On 01/09/13 08:09, Frank Murphy wrote: > On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 08:05:06

Just reporting....

looks and, now, in functionality. -- Regards, Kevin Martin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

yum update failing for last 2 days....can't find any mirrors....

opment/rawhide/x86_64/os/repodata/e92b9ceb3d0f11e5812bdfbb7ad9f971e5c7b8d95712d9731da91131e49c1462-filelists.sqlite.bz2 Trying other mirror. -- Regards, Kevin Martin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

since yesterdays update I can't "su -" anymore....

"su -" gives the following error: su: options --{shell,fast,command,session-command,login} and --user are mutually exclusive. "su root" allows me to enter the root passwordwhat's happened to "su -"? -- Regards, ---- Kevi

todays yum update....lots of errors....

Todays yum update came up with lots of errors. Perhaps they are related to ldconfig and/or issues with libraries not getting linked correctly but who knows? Anyway, here's the errors: Running Transaction Updating : 1:libreoffice-ure-3.6.3.2-2.fc19.x86_64 1/192 Updating : nss-u

Re: More experiences with F18

On 10/26/12 11:25, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: > > On 10/26/2012 09:22 AM, Kevin Martin wrote: >> On 10/26/12 10:44, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: >>> On 10/26/2012 06:21 AM, Kevin Martin wrote: >>>> On 10/25/12 23:42, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R

Re: More experiences with F18

On 10/26/12 10:44, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: > > On 10/26/2012 06:21 AM, Kevin Martin wrote: >> On 10/25/12 23:42, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: >>> While waiting for a more functional Anaconda I have been >>> running 64 bit F18 with yum updates. &

Re: More experiences with F18

On 10/25/12 23:42, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: > While waiting for a more functional Anaconda I have been > running 64 bit F18 with yum updates. > > The Noveau driver still crashes. Fortunately Nvidia still installs. > > I am able to run SCO Openserver 5.0.7 under the virtual machine. >

texlive-base fails install (rawhide)

gards, Kevin Martin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

ldconfig failing during yum update was :Re: yum update failing on rpm-libs update...

On 10/17/12 12:34, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Just as a datapoint I am not seeing this on my rawhide instance... ;( > > So, not sure if it was an issue because I missed a days updates or > what. > > kevin > > > It looks like it's not necessarily related to rpm-libs in particular but only to the fa

Re: yum update failing on rpm-libs update...

On 10/17/12 11:53, Kevin Martin wrote: > Tried to do a yum update for rawhide and it hangs. There appears to be > something wrong with /sbin/ldconfig from > glibc-2.16.90-24.fc19.x86_64.rpm. Every yum update I do now hangs while > trying to do an /sbin/ldconfig and if I try to upda

yum update failing on rpm-libs update...

ldconfig ldconfig cores and the update continues (probably not the behaviour we want to see). Is there a newer version of glibc available and/or what changed in ldconfig? Regards, Kevin Martin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https

Re: Adventures with TC4

On 10/17/12 09:06, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: > > On 10/17/2012 06:21 AM, Kevin Martin wrote: >> On 10/16/12 22:39, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: >>> I have installed TC4 netinst a couple of times. >>> The problem with the screen going black duri

Re: Adventures with TC4

On 10/16/12 22:39, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: > I have installed TC4 netinst a couple of times. > The problem with the screen going black during the default install remains. > > I did another install after changing "quiet" to "nomodeset" in netinst. > This install proceeded properly, albe

why would I be seeing kswapd0 using so much CPU?

I'm seeing this: # top top - 10:28:30 up 23:45, 9 users, load average: 0.75, 0.83, 0.98 Tasks: 221 total, 2 running, 219 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie %Cpu(s): 1.0 us, 27.5 sy, 0.0 ni, 69.9 id, 0.8 wa, 0.6 hi, 0.2 si, 0.0 st KiB Mem: 3952540 total, 2834232 used, 1118308 free,

Re: F18 TC3 No Logout Option?

>> This is a new feature from the GNOME team (i.e. it's intended). They believe >> there are no use cases for logging out, if you have just a single user. > > It is a little more nuanced than that. > > We don't offer to log out if there is just a single user, and a single > session (ie desktop en

Re: F18 TC3 No Logout Option?

>> This is a new feature from the GNOME team (i.e. it's intended). They believe >> there are no use cases for logging out, if you have just a single user. > > It is a little more nuanced than that. > > We don't offer to log out if there is just a single user, and a single > session (ie desktop

Re: Has anybody else seen a delay in xfce?

On 10/08/12 13:26, Rick Stevens wrote: > On 10/08/2012 05:15 AM, Kevin Martin issued this missive: >> >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > >>> > Regards, >>> > >>> > ---

Re: Has anybody else seen a delay in xfce?

>> >> So I can switch from workspace to workspace with no issue >> now. The other issue I'm still seeing is when I move a >> window within the >> workspace...instead of the window just moving to the new >> location that I drag it to there is a noticeable delay in >> the repaint of >> the window.

Re: Has anybody else seen a delay in xfce?

> > > > > > -- > > > > Regards, > > > > ---- > > Kevin Martin > > -- > > I use F17 and Xfce. My PC is very old (Athlon) so I see a delay when > switching to a thunderbir

Has anybody else seen a delay in xfce?

. So is this an xfce issue or an X issue do you think? I didn't see this behaviour in the past before starting to work with F18 and rawhide. -- Regards, Kevin Martin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

yum update of F18 showing a strange error...

not receive a reply. Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or the network connection was broken. -- Regards, Kevin Martin -- test mailing list test

Re: RC 3.1 Really broken

On Sep 15, 2012 4:13 AM, "Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R" wrote: > > > On 09/15/2012 01:00 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: >> >> On 15/09/12 08:57, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: >>> >>> I downloaded the 64 bit RC 3.1 and burned another DVD+R. >>> This one does not even get to the language choice scre

Re: F18 yum update bricks X

On Sep 13, 2012 3:37 PM, "Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R" wrote: > > After successfully installing RC3 and adding various > packages to compile gnuradio et al. I issued a > yum -y --skip-broken update > > This pparently updated Noveau or something to a > version that doesn't quite work. The cursor

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 18 Alpha Test Compose 6 (TC6) Available Now!

On Sep 9, 2012 12:12 PM, "Kamil Paral" wrote: > > > As per the Fedora 18 schedule [1], Fedora 18 Alpha Test Compose 6 > > (TC6) > > is now available for testing. > > Please note that Live images are mislabeled (contain 'TC5' in their name), but they are TC6 content. > _

Re: xorg IOPL issue under rawhide...can't run X

On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 19:22 -0500, kevin martin wrote: > > Can't run X on my laptop anymore due to the IOPL error shown below. > > I've also included lines from an strace of xinit that I did at this > > same t

xorg IOPL issue under rawhide...can't run X

Can't run X on my laptop anymore due to the IOPL error shown below. I've also included lines from an strace of xinit that I did at this same time. Anybody with any thoughts on how to get this fixed so I can run X again? [ 7855.008] X.Org X Server 1.12.3 Release Date: 2012-07-09 [ 7855.011] X Pr

Re: Rawhide file-conflict gnupg <> gnupg2

On 07/27/2012 10:17 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: > On 27/07/12 14:22, Kevin Martin wrote: >> On 07/27/2012 04:37 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: >>> Transaction Check Error: >>>file /usr/share/man/man1/gpg-zip.1.gz from install of >>> gnupg2-2.0.19-3.fc18.i686 confli

Re: Rawhide file-conflict gnupg <> gnupg2

On 07/27/2012 04:37 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: > Transaction Check Error: > file /usr/share/man/man1/gpg-zip.1.gz from install of > gnupg2-2.0.19-3.fc18.i686 conflicts with file from package > gnupg-1.4.12-2.fc18.i686 > Do you need both gnupg and gnupg2 on the same system at the same time? What

thunderbird 14 from rawhide won't install because thunderbird-enigmail needs tbird < 14

I didn't see a thunderbird-enigmail package in koji...is anybody working on getting a thunderbird-enigmail package for tbird 14? -- Regards, Kevin Martin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma

Re: need firefox 14 to go with xulrunner 14 from rawhide (x86_64)...

On 07/18/2012 02:44 PM, Kevin Martin wrote: > On 07/18/2012 02:37 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 14:14 -0500, Kevin Martin wrote: >>> firefox 13 installed won't run with xulrunner 14 from rawhide.When >>> trying to run FF13 with xulrunner 1

Re: need firefox 14 to go with xulrunner 14 from rawhide (x86_64)...

On 07/18/2012 02:37 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 14:14 -0500, Kevin Martin wrote: >> firefox 13 installed won't run with xulrunner 14 from rawhide.When >> trying to run FF13 with xulrunner 14 I get: >> >> Error: Platform version

need firefox 14 to go with xulrunner 14 from rawhide (x86_64)...

repository so we can update to it? BTW, FF14 from Mozilla download runs fine. -- Regards, ---- Kevin Martin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: today's yum dependency issues for rawhide

On 07/11/2012 08:30 PM, Kevin Martin wrote: > On 07/11/2012 04:49 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 16:39:28 -0500, >> Kevin Martin wrote: >>>> >>> Please explain why that makes any difference in this discussion. I'm not >&

  1   2   >