On Fri, 2014-11-07 at 09:10 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> Now you might believe that yum group list would show all groups ... it
> does not. Give the follow a try:
>
> yum group info gnome\*
> yum group info kde\*
> yum group info xfce\*
> yum group info cinnamon\*
> yum group
On 11/05/2014 07:49 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 16:13 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
Bill, Stephen, Matt, Kalev - I think we could stand to take another look
at this. I see two immediate issues:
2) We just don't have a good story for installing extra desktops
post-install an
On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 11:18 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Perhaps something where each product's metadata defines the environment
> groups to include the appropriate fedora-release- package, but the
> environment groups in the general case *don't*? Not sure that's possible,
> and it might lead t
On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 09:29 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 11/06/14 08:13, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Bill, Stephen, Matt, Kalev - I think we could stand to take another look
> > at this. I see two immediate issues:
> >
> > 1) Workstation is set up rather differently to the other desktop-y
> > produ
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 11:18:28AM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> That would be sort of how I'd expect it to work, yes. But do people mixing
> and matching desktops post-install want installing 'GNOME' (defined
> nebulously here) to workstation-ize their system?
I don't think we want that, no. An
Adam Williamson (adamw...@fedoraproject.org) said:
> 1) Workstation is set up rather differently to the other desktop-y
> products/environments. There's rather an overlap between the
> 'workstation-product' group and the 'gnome-desktop' group. I'd sort of
> expect the 'workstation-product-environm
On 11/06/14 08:13, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Bill, Stephen, Matt, Kalev - I think we could stand to take another look
> at this. I see two immediate issues:
>
> 1) Workstation is set up rather differently to the other desktop-y
> products/environments. There's rather an overlap between the
> 'workst
On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 16:13 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Bill, Stephen, Matt, Kalev - I think we could stand to take another look
> at this. I see two immediate issues:
> 2) We just don't have a good story for installing extra desktops
> post-install any more. The only 'desktop' groups visible
On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 07:48 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 11/06/14 07:34, Thomas Gilliard wrote:
> >
> > On 11/5/2014 3:10 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> >> On 11/06/14 07:06, Adrian wrote:
> >>> What is the advantage of using dnf instead of yum ?
> >>>
> >>>
> > This command works with f21-live-workstati
On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 07:10 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 11/06/14 07:06, Adrian wrote:
> >
> > What is the advantage of using dnf instead of yum ?
> >
> >
>
> None
>
> yum group install gnome-desktop
>
> Would have worked just as well
>
> The *problem* however is finding this out when
On 11/06/14 07:34, Thomas Gilliard wrote:
>
> On 11/5/2014 3:10 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 11/06/14 07:06, Adrian wrote:
>>> What is the advantage of using dnf instead of yum ?
>>>
>>>
> This command works with f21-live-workstation Beta_FinalTC-1 x86_64 DVD>HD
> install (with yum update run first
Ok, I went from the Gnome desktop in workstation to KDE, with
|yum groupinstall"KDE Plasma Workspaces"|
with no issue. I installed the rc4 just before official beta release.
[root@fedora21desk yum.repos.d]# cat fedora-updates.repo
[updates]
name=Fedora $releasever - $basearch - Updates
failover
On 11/5/2014 3:10 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 11/06/14 07:06, Adrian wrote:
What is the advantage of using dnf instead of yum ?
This command works with f21-live-workstation Beta_FinalTC-1 x86_64
DVD>HD install (with yum update run first)
yum install @sugar-desktop @KDE-desktop
None
yum
On 11/06/14 07:06, Adrian wrote:
>
> What is the advantage of using dnf instead of yum ?
>
>
None
yum group install gnome-desktop
Would have worked just as well
The *problem* however is finding this out when a list of the groups doesn't
show it in either yum or dnf.
--
If you can't
What is the advantage of using dnf instead of yum ?
Adrian Fewster
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 11/06/14 06:44, Reynold wrote:
>
> On 11/05/2014 02:00 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
>> On 11/05/2014 12:35 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> On 10/26/14 11:06, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 10:51 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 10/26/14 10:48, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Sun, 20
On 11/05/2014 02:00 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 11/05/2014 12:35 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 10/26/14 11:06, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 10:51 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 10/26/14 10:48, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 10:44 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 10/26/14
On 11/06/14 06:00, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> OK, try some of the following:
>
>yum -v group list
> which should list the groups available.
>
>yum -v group info workstation-product-environment
>
> which shows workstation-product
>
>and finally yum -v info workstation-product
> which s
On 11/05/2014 12:35 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 10/26/14 11:06, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 10:51 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 10/26/14 10:48, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 10:44 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 10/26/14 10:40, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2014-10-26
On 05.11.2014 11:25, poma wrote:
> On 05.11.2014 11:11, poma wrote:
>>>Fedora Workstation
>>
>
> or maybe not
> "... a reliable, user-friendly and powerful operating system for laptops and
> PC hardware."
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Workstation
>
> So yum is offering a whole system to in
On 05.11.2014 11:11, poma wrote:
>>Fedora Workstation
>
or maybe not
"... a reliable, user-friendly and powerful operating system for laptops and PC
hardware."
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Workstation
So yum is offering a whole system to install inside already system installed,
not a desk
>Fedora Workstation
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 10:20 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> There is a "Fedora Workstation" but that can't be installed due to
I have a similar issue actually, but the other way around:
Fresh F21 beta workstation install. I tried to install KDE using dnf,
but fedora-release-workstation and fedora-
On 11/05/14 16:59, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 13:35 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 10/26/14 11:06, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 10:51 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 10/26/14 10:48, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 10:44 +0800, Ed Greshko w
On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 13:35 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 10/26/14 11:06, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 10:51 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> >> On 10/26/14 10:48, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 10:44 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 10/26/14 10:40, Adam Williams
On 11/05/14 14:09, Andrei Amuraritei wrote:
> how about: dnf group install 'GNOME Desktop Environment'
> This works here.
[root@localhost ~]# dnf group install 'GNOME Desktop Environment'
Error: No relevant match for the specified 'GNOME Desktop Environment'.
[root@localhost ~]# cat /etc/fedora-r
On Wednesday, November 05, 2014 01:35:24 PM Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 10/26/14 11:06, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 10:51 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> >> On 10/26/14 10:48, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 10:44 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 10/26/14 10:40, Adam
On 10/26/14 11:06, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 10:51 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 10/26/14 10:48, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 10:44 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 10/26/14 10:40, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 10:20 +0800, Ed Greshko w
On 10/26/14 11:06, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 10:51 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 10/26/14 10:48, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 10:44 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 10/26/14 10:40, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 10:20 +0800, Ed Greshko w
On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 10:51 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 10/26/14 10:48, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 10:44 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> >> On 10/26/14 10:40, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 10:20 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> After doing a KDE install from t
On 10/26/14 10:48, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 10:44 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 10/26/14 10:40, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 10:20 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
After doing a KDE install from the Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-21_Beta
ISO I wanted to a
On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 10:44 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 10/26/14 10:40, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 10:20 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> >> After doing a KDE install from the Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-21_Beta
> >> ISO I wanted to add GNOME to the mix.
> >>
> >> In the past, e
On 10/26/14 10:40, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 10:20 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> After doing a KDE install from the Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-21_Beta ISO
>> I wanted to add GNOME to the mix.
>>
>> In the past, even on B-TC4 I believe, I simply did "yum groupinstall "GNOME
>>
On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 10:20 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> After doing a KDE install from the Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-21_Beta ISO I
> wanted to add GNOME to the mix.
>
> In the past, even on B-TC4 I believe, I simply did "yum groupinstall "GNOME
> Desktop"". However, now that choice no longer
After doing a KDE install from the Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-21_Beta ISO I
wanted to add GNOME to the mix.
In the past, even on B-TC4 I believe, I simply did "yum groupinstall "GNOME
Desktop"". However, now that choice no longer exists when doing "yum
grouplist".
There is a "Fedora Worksta
35 matches
Mail list logo
