On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 14:19 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 12:02:09 -0800,
>Adam Williamson wrote:
> >On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 11:09 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> >
> >2. (bwolff) "I think we can live without prefixes for the whiteboard.
> >There could be cases where a
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 12:02:09 -0800,
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 11:09 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
2. (bwolff) "I think we can live without prefixes for the whiteboard.
There could be cases where a bug is freezeexception for alpha and
blocker for beta, but those could be
On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 11:09 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 09:42:22 -0700,
>Chris Murphy wrote:
> >
> >ProposedBlocker
> >Blocker
> >RejectedBlocker
> >ProposedFreezeException
> >FreezeException
> >RejectedFreezeException
> >
> >And I assume it's still the case each of
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 09:42:22 -0700,
Chris Murphy wrote:
ProposedBlocker
Blocker
RejectedBlocker
ProposedFreezeException
FreezeException
RejectedFreezeException
And I assume it's still the case each of those has three modifiers: Alpha,
Beta, Final.
I think we can live without prefixes
On Jan 22, 2013, at 2:21 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
>
> As for the whiteboard labels, to keep things consistent, we can use:
>
> AcceptedBlocker
> RejectedBlocker
> AcceptedFreezeException
> RejectedFreezeException
>
> The latter is a bit long though, any other proposals?
I would drop "accepted".
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:57:12 -0600,
>Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> >Proposing a small refinement: we apply the release specific alias
> >names
> >to the old trackers after each release. So right now the F19 bugs
> >would
> >be AlphaBlocker, AlphaFreezeException etc: when F19 goes out, we
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:57:12 -0600,
Adam Williamson wrote:
Proposing a small refinement: we apply the release specific alias names
to the old trackers after each release. So right now the F19 bugs would
be AlphaBlocker, AlphaFreezeException etc: when F19 goes out, we
transfer those aliase
On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 12:08 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 04:48:56AM -0500, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > Big thumbs up. A few things for consideration:
> > 1. Do we need numbers in the alias? We always release just a single Fedora
> > at a time.
>
> If they're _not_ per release
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 04:48:56AM -0500, Kamil Paral wrote:
> Big thumbs up. A few things for consideration:
> 1. Do we need numbers in the alias? We always release just a single Fedora at
> a time.
If they're _not_ per release, all of the old dependencies will need to be
removed from the alias
On Po, 2013-01-21 at 04:48 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > The proposal is this:
> >
> > fXXalpha
> > fXXalpha-freezebreak
> > fXXbeta
> > fXXbeta-freezebreak
> > fXXfinal
> > fXXfinal-freezebreak
> >
> > acceptedblocker
> > acceptedfb
>
> Big thumbs up. A few things for consideration:
>
> 1. Do
On 01/21/2013 09:48 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
The proposal is this:
fXXalpha
fXXalpha-freezebreak
fXXbeta
fXXbeta-freezebreak
fXXfinal
fXXfinal-freezebreak
acceptedblocker
acceptedfb
Big thumbs up. A few things for consideration:
1. Do we need numbers in the alias? We always release just a singl
> The proposal is this:
>
> fXXalpha
> fXXalpha-freezebreak
> fXXbeta
> fXXbeta-freezebreak
> fXXfinal
> fXXfinal-freezebreak
>
> acceptedblocker
> acceptedfb
Big thumbs up. A few things for consideration:
1. Do we need numbers in the alias? We always release just a single Fedora at a
time.
2
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi folks! We're running a FUDCon NA workshop session today to try and
> actually knock out some QA 'low-hanging fruit', and the one we tried to
> deal with this morning is the blocker tracker bug names. We had some
> grand ideas for making
On Sun, 2013-01-20 at 13:27 -0600, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > and can you point me
> > to any talk where this has come up?
>
> There've been multiple threads and meeting discussions, I don't have
> references handy, but I thought you'd remember that too...
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/piper
On Sun, 2013-01-20 at 19:05 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 01/20/2013 06:49 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > This is an issue that's come up repeatedly in the past and was also came
> > up during the talk Tim gave on the blocker process on Friday: the
> > feedback from everyone at the mee
On 01/20/2013 06:49 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
This is an issue that's come up repeatedly in the past and was also came
up during the talk Tim gave on the blocker process on Friday: the
feedback from everyone at the meeting (QA people and non-QA people) was
that the current names were really bad
Hi folks! We're running a FUDCon NA workshop session today to try and
actually knock out some QA 'low-hanging fruit', and the one we tried to
deal with this morning is the blocker tracker bug names. We had some
grand ideas for making this even better in the glorious future, which
involve more good
17 matches
Mail list logo
