On 03/23/2012 09:36 PM, Paul Whalen wrote:
A ticket was previously opened up to address the issue of incorporating ARM
into the existing QA tests (http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/277), and
begin the discussion of what work is still needed. I would like to revisit this
on the mailing
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 3:14 AM, John Reiser jrei...@bitwagon.com wrote:
On 03/23/2012 02:36 PM, Paul Whalen wrote [has been snipped]:
We have recently opened up discussions with developers and the community,
engaging in a variety of topics to understand the requirements of moving
the ARM
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 13:00 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 03/23/2012 09:36 PM, Paul Whalen wrote:
A ticket was previously opened up to address the issue of incorporating
ARM into the existing QA tests
On 03/24/2012 03:55 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
The big difference is that ARM doesn't currently use, or plan to use,
anaconda for deployment. They work by building images specific to
particular target devices, which you just dump onto the device and then
boot.
Which only means that the
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 16:37 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 03/24/2012 04:22 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
That's not entirely true, in the short term we likely won't use
anaconda, in the medium to long term we
Good day,
By way of introduction - I'm Paul Whalen, recently hired by Red Hat to look at
introducing QA testing for Fedora ARM. I have been working in the ARM space
since Seneca College took on the task of hosting the Fedoa Koji Build System in
May of 2010.
With an increase of consumer and
+infinity :-)
--
Jan H Wildeboer|
EMEA Open Source Affairs | Office: +49 (0)89 205071-207
Red Hat GmbH | Mobile: +49 (0)174 33 23 249
Technopark II, Haus C | Fax:+49 (0)89 205071-111
Werner-von-Siemens-Ring 11 -15 |
85630 Grasbrunn
On 03/23/2012 02:36 PM, Paul Whalen wrote [has been snipped]:
We have recently opened up discussions with developers and the community,
engaging in a variety of topics to understand the requirements of moving
the ARM secondary arch to primary ( details
On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 20:14 -0700, John Reiser wrote:
On 03/23/2012 02:36 PM, Paul Whalen wrote [has been snipped]:
We have recently opened up discussions with developers and the community,
engaging in a variety of topics to understand the requirements of moving
the ARM secondary arch to
