On Út, 2012-03-13 at 22:14 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Ack! Since we had a solid consensus on the meeting I think we should
just go ahead and put this in the Beta criteria.
The new criterion is right on the place. So from now, non-functional
serial console interface is beta (and final)
On St, 2012-03-07 at 18:04 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 08:21 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote:
Because there are some objections for serial interface being in final
criterion, I'd like to start discussion again. There was discussion
on
blocker bug meeting [1] (17:40)
On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 08:54 +0100, Petr Schindler wrote:
Hi,
because no one had objections against it and we decided on blocker bug
meeting, that serial console is blocker, I propose to add criterion:
The installer must be able to complete an installation using the serial
console
Because there are some objections for serial interface being in final
criterion, I'd like to start discussion again. There was discussion
on
blocker bug meeting [1] (17:40) and it didn't end with unanimous
decision. So, let the flame war begin. Do you want serial interface
in
beta
On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 08:21 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote:
Because there are some objections for serial interface being in final
criterion, I'd like to start discussion again. There was discussion
on
blocker bug meeting [1] (17:40) and it didn't end with unanimous
decision. So, let the flame
Serial is definitely needed and is a beta blocker. I am with Adam.
Dan
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 08:21 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote:
Because there are some objections for serial interface being in final
criterion, I'd
Because there are some objections for serial interface being in final
criterion, I'd like to start discussion again. There was discussion on
blocker bug meeting [1] (17:40) and it didn't end with unanimous
decision. So, let the flame war begin. Do you want serial interface in
beta criterion? I
Because nobody had any objections, I've added new criterion to [1] and
I've changed release level of [2] to final.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Final_Release_Criteria
[2]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_User_Interface_Cmdline
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 09:55 -0800,
I propose new final criterion:
The installer must be able to complete an installation using all
supported interfaces
Serial port is covered by this one. As I've seen some discussion on
anaconda-devel list, it's still supported.
I'm still waiting for anaconda opinion of cmdline interface [1].
I forgot to mention that if this criterion will be accepted, we should
move test case [2] to final release level.
And I forgot to give a link to anaconda-devel thread about supported
interfaces [1]
[1]
https://www.redhat.com/archives/anaconda-devel-list/2012-January/msg00207.html
[2]
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 17:39 +0100, Petr Schindler wrote:
I propose new final criterion:
The installer must be able to complete an installation using all
supported interfaces
Serial port is covered by this one. As I've seen some discussion on
anaconda-devel list, it's still supported.
11 matches
Mail list logo
