On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 11:22 +0100, Camilo Mesias wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have an ATI Mobility Radeon X300 based laptop (x86) and tried to
> boot the boot.iso by using livecd-iso-to-disk but the installer could
> not see the image (CD/DVD not present, other options NFS, local disk -
> not including the
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 10:59 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> Hi, everyone. So, we have one bug remaining for Fedora 14 whose blocker
>> status is unclear:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596985
>
> A follow up to this: a b
On 08/16/2010 08:40 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 10:59 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> Hi, everyone. So, we have one bug remaining for Fedora 14 whose blocker
>> status is unclear:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596985
>
> A follow up to this: a boot.iso w
On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 23:40 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 10:59 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Hi, everyone. So, we have one bug remaining for Fedora 14 whose blocker
> > status is unclear:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596985
>
> A follow up to th
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 10:59 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi, everyone. So, we have one bug remaining for Fedora 14 whose blocker
> status is unclear:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596985
A follow up to this: a boot.iso with a proposed fix for this bug is
available at http://a
On 08/13/2010 06:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 01:28 +0200, Patrick Lists wrote:
>
>> Acer laptop TM6465WMLi with X1300:
>>
>> The RC3.1 x86_64 live image boots fine into KMS mode. I can see the
>> Fedora logo getting whiter in steps from bottom left towards the top
>> right
On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 01:28 +0200, Patrick Lists wrote:
> Acer laptop TM6465WMLi with X1300:
>
> The RC3.1 x86_64 live image boots fine into KMS mode. I can see the
> Fedora logo getting whiter in steps from bottom left towards the top
> right. I used a cd that was too small for the image (used
On 08/13/2010 12:09 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 23:59 +0200, Patrick Lists wrote:
>> On 08/12/2010 10:43 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 22:35 +0200, François Cami wrote:
>>>
OK here on RV410 (Radeon X700 Pro, R400 family), using KMS.
I will be
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Patrick Lists
wrote:
> On 08/13/2010 12:23 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> [snip]
>> Using nomodeset allows x to start on a:
>>
>> $ lspci | grep VGA
>> 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV630 [Radeon HD
>> 2600 Series]
>
> Is nomodeset differen
On 08/13/2010 12:23 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
[snip]
> Using nomodeset allows x to start on a:
>
> $ lspci | grep VGA
> 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV630 [Radeon HD
> 2600 Series]
Is nomodeset different from radeon.modeset=0? In other words should I
test this too besi
On 08/13/2010 12:04 AM, François Cami wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:59 PM, Patrick Lists
> wrote:
>> On 08/12/2010 10:43 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 22:35 +0200, François Cami wrote:
>>>
OK here on RV410 (Radeon X700 Pro, R400 family), using KMS.
I will be
On 08/12/2010 01:59 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi, everyone. So, we have one bug remaining for Fedora 14 whose blocker
> status is unclear:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596985
>
> Two reporters in the bug - John Reiser and Mike Chambers - and one
> reporter from the list - Rui
On 08/13/2010 12:12 AM, Patrick Lists wrote:
> On 08/12/2010 10:43 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 22:35 +0200, François Cami wrote:
>>
>>> OK here on RV410 (Radeon X700 Pro, R400 family), using KMS.
>>> I will be testing older cards (Radeon 7500, FireGL 8800) as time permits.
>
On 08/12/2010 10:43 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 22:35 +0200, François Cami wrote:
>
>> OK here on RV410 (Radeon X700 Pro, R400 family), using KMS.
>> I will be testing older cards (Radeon 7500, FireGL 8800) as time permits.
>
> Thanks, Francois! Jerome mentioned he has a repr
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 23:59 +0200, Patrick Lists wrote:
> On 08/12/2010 10:43 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 22:35 +0200, François Cami wrote:
> >
> >> OK here on RV410 (Radeon X700 Pro, R400 family), using KMS.
> >> I will be testing older cards (Radeon 7500, FireGL 8800) as
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:59 PM, Patrick Lists
wrote:
> On 08/12/2010 10:43 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 22:35 +0200, François Cami wrote:
>>
>>> OK here on RV410 (Radeon X700 Pro, R400 family), using KMS.
>>> I will be testing older cards (Radeon 7500, FireGL 8800) as time
On 08/12/2010 10:43 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 22:35 +0200, François Cami wrote:
>
>> OK here on RV410 (Radeon X700 Pro, R400 family), using KMS.
>> I will be testing older cards (Radeon 7500, FireGL 8800) as time permits.
>
> Thanks, Francois! Jerome mentioned he has a repr
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 22:35 +0200, François Cami wrote:
> OK here on RV410 (Radeon X700 Pro, R400 family), using KMS.
> I will be testing older cards (Radeon 7500, FireGL 8800) as time permits.
Thanks, Francois! Jerome mentioned he has a reproducer now, a specific
monitor, but the testing is stil
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi, everyone. So, we have one bug remaining for Fedora 14 whose blocker
> status is unclear:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596985
>
> Two reporters in the bug - John Reiser and Mike Chambers - and one
> reporter from the l
19 matches
Mail list logo
