On Sat, 9 Aug 2003 10:51:05 -0700
Aaron Bannert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday, August 8, 2003, at 02:11 PM, Jacek Prucia wrote:
>
> > Yes. To be honest I don't think we need such functionality in flood.
> > Since all
> > we care about is web server load testing, it simply doesn't make
On Sat, 9 Aug 2003 12:44:18 -0500
John Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[..]
> As for writing test pages, I've certainly got a few hours to do it in
> PHP if you'd like my help.
Well... you can start if you like. Basicall you schould see what all various
example/* file do. You would have to write
This probably belongs in contrib/patches. It is a quick'n'dirty hack I did few
days ago, to simulate applet making network connection. Basically it allows
for something like this:
http://www.example.com/
Such script get's whole response buffer (headers and the body). You can then
just do about
This is what I have mentioned earlier this day. This introduces a
CONFIG_VERSION define, which is used to represent a certain config file
format. Every time we change config fle format (adding features, moving things
around), we bump this number. This makes easy to determine, that somebody is
usin
On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 19:06:01 -0700
Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> My real life is causing me not to be able to devote time to flood right
> now, but I would love to see a new release of flood out that incorporates
> the bugfixes since 0.4.
Yeah... The docs are quite okay r
