On Sat, 9 Aug 2003 10:51:05 -0700 Aaron Bannert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday, August 8, 2003, at 02:11 PM, Jacek Prucia wrote: > > > Yes. To be honest I don't think we need such functionality in flood. > > Since all > > we care about is web server load testing, it simply doesn't make any > > sense to > > put any obstacles between flood and web server, as this could result > > in false > > output (we would load test proxy, not web server). > > Someone may want to test an entire system, proxies and all. Good point. > (I'm not volunteering to add it, but I'd review and commit someone else's > code. :) Well... After all this doesn't look very hard to acomplish. Proxies schould be transparent for all HTTP clients (flood included), so looks like all we need is a <proxy> element in urllist and simple tweaks in socket_init and get_next_url. I don't have much time either, but I'll see what I can do. regards, Jacek Prucia
