well, since I know andre is paying attention, I thought I'd start with
mod_include :)
ok, I made some adjustments to t/modules/include.t to accommodate 1.3, 2.0,
and 2.1. hopefully, all I did was shuffle things around so that it's easier
to keep track of the three cases: proper behavior, in-proce
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> oh, and I'm very impressed with the thoroughness of the tests, btw. nice
> work.
That's what happens when you keep adding more and more tests and you STILL
get people reporting failure cases. Sigh.
Thanks though. :-)
--Cliff
Geoffrey Young wrote:
well, since I know andre is paying attention, I thought I'd start with
mod_include :)
ok, I made some adjustments to t/modules/include.t to accommodate 1.3, 2.0,
and 2.1. hopefully, all I did was shuffle things around so that it's easier
to keep track of the three cases: prop
> Just to add to the concern Bill has voiced, there is a risk of "fixing"
> testing here. You see that the sub-tests have failed only if you run in
> the verbose mode. Most people won't do that, and will miss those
> failures, thinking that everything is proper.
hmm, what gives you that impres
hi all
t/apache/limits.t has one failure on Apache 1.3 - a chunked body that
exceeds the limits. 2.0/2.1 returns 413 (entity too large) while 1.3
returns 400 (bad request).
after looking at the code in 1.3 I think this is intentional -
ap_get_client_block specifically handles this condition, whi
Geoffrey Young wrote:
Just to add to the concern Bill has voiced, there is a risk of "fixing"
testing here. You see that the sub-tests have failed only if you run in
the verbose mode. Most people won't do that, and will miss those
failures, thinking that everything is proper.
hmm, what gives yo
* Geoffrey Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> well, since I know andre is paying attention, I thought I'd start with
> mod_include :)
heh ;-)
> the only place I'm a bit confused is the flastmod/fsize test, which is
> marked as TODO currently but is "unexpectedly passing" in 2.0/2.1. the
> comme