t_cmp() revisited

so we reverted the args to t_cmp() to comply with other Test modules conventions, but why reverting the debug printout? I find it confusing: # received: undef # expected: foobar Do the other test modules also print it reversed? --

Re: flood config question

On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 16:52:03 +0100 Pete Stokes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi. I am trying to use flood, and I am wondering is there a list of options available for elements, i.e. socketgeneric/socket what other options exist for socket? I'm after a source of info for as much as

Re: t_cmp() revisited

Stas Bekman wrote: so we reverted the args to t_cmp() to comply with other Test modules conventions, but why reverting the debug printout? I find it confusing: # received: undef # expected: foobar Do the other test modules also print it reversed? OK, as agreed over irc I've reversed those only

Re: A::T :withtestmore

[Sun Jul 11 16:31:59 2004] [notice] Accept mutex: sysvsem (Default: sysvsem) Warning: Use of require without parentheses is ambiguous at (eval 12) line 1. [Sun Jul 11 16:32:01 2004] [error] Undefined subroutine TestApache::My::Bug::bug-tm::handler called.\n [Sun Jul 11 16:32:01