Re: getting rid of 'server reached MaxClients setting' error

2004-04-28 Thread gregames
Stas Bekman wrote: I think this misleading error is really a bug in Apache: I agree. [Mon Apr 26 15:28:44 2004] [error] server reached MaxClients setting, consider raising the MaxClients setting It sounds like a one-off bug to me. It reports that error when the number of workers is the same as M

Re: Regarding Apache 2.0.48 and specweb99

2004-01-09 Thread gregames
Joshua Schnee wrote: I am attempting to set up the latest Apache server and RHEL 64bit to use in a Specweb99 run and am running into cgi issues. I am very new to Apache, and am having difficulty getting apache to run/use/find my cgi-script. Static content works fine, but I am getting improper

Re: Regarding Apache 2.0.48 and specweb99

2003-12-03 Thread gregames
MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote: I enabled the POST transactions, and all of a sudden, the apache process is now hung (this is first time I'm seeing this behaviour).. The stack is : (gdb) t 21 [Switching to thread 21 (system thread 29207)] #0 0xc0306850:0 in _semop_sys+0x30

Re: Regarding Apache 2.0.48 and specweb99

2003-12-02 Thread gregames
MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote: I think I found the problem (.. and it's not the cgid exiting problem). The problem was because the default Listen Backlog in mod_cgid was a little small (100 outstanding connections). I got the following tusc log for the httpd processes : {62717} con

Re: Regarding Apache 2.0.48 and specweb99

2003-11-24 Thread gregames
les: core.c worker.c http_core.c mod_suexec.c mod_so.c Greg ServerRoot /home/gregames/apache/httpd-2.0.48/built DocumentRoot /spec_docroot User webuser Group staff LoadModule specweb99_module modules/mod_specweb99.so LoadModule status_module modules/mod_status.so LoadModule info_modul

Re: Regarding Apache 2.0.48 and specweb99

2003-11-21 Thread gregames
MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote: Hi Greg, The recent set of discussions prompted me to get some Apache numbers out there - and when I started with the SPECweb99 run, I experienced a major hang in the Apache, and the cgid daemon getting killed (I don't know how). Have you also

Re: Regarding Apache 2.0.48 and specweb99

2003-11-21 Thread gregames
MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote: cgid should _never_ exit without something in the error log. I tried attaching tusc to the cgi daemon - but since the daemon dies at a random time, my log file was getting too full, and I had to just stop it. Why not just let tusc write to a conso

Re: Regarding Apache 2.0.48 and specweb99

2003-11-21 Thread gregames
making public per Madhu MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote: I'm using 2.0.48 and also back-ported the cgid-restart patch to 2.0.48. I got a little further on the issue : The Apache hang is definitely caused by the cgid exiting. cgid should _never_ exit without something in the error log

Re: [PATCH] Get mod_specweb99 to compile against 2.0.43

2002-10-25 Thread gregames
"MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)" wrote: > > I noticed that there were some places where u_int32_t is being used instead > of apr_uint32_t. Is it purposefully done OR is it one of those "Oh, the apr > interface changed" stuff ?. > > Anyways, I've included a patch that atleast gets the mo