On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 21:50:44 -0700
Aaron Bannert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday, September 9, 2003, at 04:18 PM, Jacek Prucia wrote:
I would like to ask other RM's to take a closer look at RC1 tarballs.
I might
goofed something up and have absolutelly no idea about it :)
The
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 00:15:46 -0700
Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--On Wednesday, September 10, 2003 1:18 AM +0200 Jacek Prucia
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to ask other RM's to take a closer look at RC1 tarballs. I
might goofed something up and have absolutelly no
On Tuesday, September 9, 2003, at 04:18 PM, Jacek Prucia wrote:
I have just tagged the tree with FLOOD_1_1_RC1. Release tarballs (made
with
apr and apr-util HEAD) are available for testing here:
http://cvs.apache.org/~jacekp/release/
RC1 builds cleanly on my Gentoo box (with openssl and
On Tuesday, September 9, 2003, at 04:18 PM, Jacek Prucia wrote:
I would like to ask other RM's to take a closer look at RC1 tarballs.
I might
goofed something up and have absolutelly no idea about it :)
The tarball builds and runs great on Darwin 6.6 (Mac OS X 10.2.6), good
work!
Here's my +1
I have just tagged the tree with FLOOD_1_1_RC1. Release tarballs (made with
apr and apr-util HEAD) are available for testing here:
http://cvs.apache.org/~jacekp/release/
RC1 builds cleanly on my Gentoo box (with openssl and without) and all example
files report no errors at all. Will do few
