On Mar 4, 2004, at 4:15 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
The patch below attempts to give users an idea to try before they rush
to report a bug. For example:
waiting 120 seconds for server to start: not ok
giving up after 121 secs. If you think that your system
is slow or overloaded try again with a
David Wheeler wrote:
On Mar 4, 2004, at 4:15 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
The patch below attempts to give users an idea to try before they rush
to report a bug. For example:
waiting 120 seconds for server to start: not ok
giving up after 121 secs. If you think that your system
is slow or overloaded
On Mar 4, 2004, at 5:09 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
Not in this case. T-H wasn't called yet. It gets called only after
server successfully starts.
Ah, right, okay.
If you they did:
% make test
but you'd suggest to run:
% ./Build test
not only it'll confuse the user, who aren't aware of Build or t/TEST
David Wheeler wrote:
On Mar 4, 2004, at 5:09 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
Not in this case. T-H wasn't called yet. It gets called only after
server successfully starts.
Ah, right, okay.
If you they did:
% make test
but you'd suggest to run:
% ./Build test
not only it'll confuse the user, who aren't
Stas Bekman wrote:
Well, you could still say Or repeat the last command with the
-startup_timeout=420 option.
That would work, if the last command was 'make test' or any other wrapper.
s/would/won't/
--
__
Stas Bekman
