Randy Kobes wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
[ .. ]
As Bill mentioned in another message, it looks like it would be
possible to integrate it within httpd-2.0. So rather than
including it within the Apache-Test sources, what I could do is
add a post-install script
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
[ .. ]
That's what I was thinking - sorry, I should have been clearer.
ppm has a feature that, when one installs a ppm package, a script
from some server can optionally be fetched and run (by Perl, or
anything,
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
[...]
I'll take a look at this tonight as well - it'd probably
be easier to change, for Win32, the assumption of the
name of the httpd binary when apxs is present.
Thanks Randy!
Thanks for looking this over, Stas - I know
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
I've been looking at getting apxs for Win32 working on Apache 2.
where would it go? Apache::Test? mod_perl?
If there's consensus, I think the better place would be
At 10:09 PM 7/29/2003, Randy Kobes wrote:
As far getting the right name for the Win32 binary goes with apxs
present, I don't think there's an ideal solution ... To
summarize, the problem is that apxs -q TARGET ( = httpd) is used
in Apache-Test for the name of the apache binary, whereas in
other
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
[...]
I'll take a look at this tonight as well - it'd probably
be easier to change, for Win32, the assumption of the
name of the httpd binary when apxs is present.
Thanks Randy!
Thanks for looking this over, Stas - I
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
I've been looking at getting apxs for Win32 working on Apache 2.
where would it go? Apache::Test? mod_perl?
If there's consensus, I think the better place
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
+1 on the patch
Randy, whatever you think is the best for win32, please go
ahead with it. Untill we get someone else on win32 involved,
you are pretty much free to decide how to handle things and
what's the best for the user, as long as the changes
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
[ .. ]
As Bill mentioned in another message, it looks like it would be
possible to integrate it within httpd-2.0. So rather than
including it within the Apache-Test sources, what I could do is
add a post-install script to the
Randy Kobes wrote:
I've been looking at getting apxs for Win32 working on Apache 2.
There's a number of changes needed due to the current reliance on
libtool, so initially I've tried just a pure Win32 version - if
anyone wants to try it, I've put up two files - Configure.apxs
and apxs.in - at
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
I've been looking at getting apxs for Win32 working on Apache 2.
There's a number of changes needed due to the current reliance on
libtool, so initially I've tried just a pure Win32 version - if
anyone wants to try it, I've put
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
I've been looking at getting apxs for Win32 working on Apache 2.
There's a number of changes needed due to the current reliance on
libtool, so initially I've tried just a pure Win32 version - if
anyone wants to try it,
12 matches
Mail list logo
