Re: testing apache 1.3 on windows

2004-03-22 Thread Geoffrey Young
Stas Bekman wrote: Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: does this make any difference/ perl Makefile.PL -apxs K:/Coar/Apache/Server-1.3/bin/apxs.pl -httpd K:/Coar/Apache/Server-1.3/bin/Apache.exe yes, it made a difference -- but it still didn't work. it now specifies

Re: testing apache 1.3 on windows

2004-03-22 Thread Stas Bekman
Geoffrey Young wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: does this make any difference/ perl Makefile.PL -apxs K:/Coar/Apache/Server-1.3/bin/apxs.pl -httpd K:/Coar/Apache/Server-1.3/bin/Apache.exe yes, it made a difference -- but it still didn't work. it now

Re: testing apache 1.3 on windows

2004-03-17 Thread Randy Kobes
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: and a 'perl t\TEST -config' blowes up trying to build mod_random_chunk (unresolved symbols _random and _srandom). I couldn't find the _random or _srandom symbols in a system library, but changing these to rand() and srand() in

Re: testing apache 1.3 on windows

2004-03-17 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
Randy Kobes wrote: I couldn't find the _random or _srandom symbols in a system library, but changing these to rand() and srand() in mod_random_chunk.c seems to work OK. mm. i've ifdef'd those for WIN32 and will commit it; if anyone cares to verify that s/rand() are universally suitable

Re: testing apache 1.3 on windows

2004-03-17 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: Geoffrey Young wrote: it all boils down to TestConfigParse::httpd_version() glad to know it's somewhat identified. that (or similar foo) will happen when you try to test first against 2.0 and then against 1.3, regardless of win32 vs unix. at least that's

Re: testing apache 1.3 on windows

2004-03-17 Thread Randy Kobes
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: Randy Kobes wrote: I couldn't find the _random or _srandom symbols in a system library, but changing these to rand() and srand() in mod_random_chunk.c seems to work OK. mm. i've ifdef'd those for WIN32 and will commit it; if anyone

Re: testing apache 1.3 on windows

2004-03-16 Thread Randy Kobes
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: Randy Kobes wrote: There is an alpha port of apxs for Win32 for Apache/2.0; grab the script http://perl.apache.org/dist/win32-bin/install_apxs and run it, which will fetch, configure, and install it on your system. beauty.

Re: testing apache 1.3 on windows

2004-03-15 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
Geoffrey Young wrote: it all boils down to TestConfigParse::httpd_version() glad to know it's somewhat identified. that (or similar foo) will happen when you try to test first against 2.0 and then against 1.3, regardless of win32 vs unix. at least that's been my experience. try first

Re: testing apache 1.3 on windows

2004-03-15 Thread William McKee
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 09:04:32AM -0500, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: explodes with the attempt to treat the 1.3 apxs.pl as 2.0, complete with the same -D APACHE2. Ken, I had a slightly different variation of sticky preferences problems over the weekend. I found preferences stored in the

Re: testing apache 1.3 on windows

2004-03-15 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
also, there apparently is no longer an apxs.pl for 2.0 windows -- so what's the magic Makefile.PL argument to let the test modules be built? in case there was any question, i hate development on windows, i hate libtool, and i think i've discovered a special subtype of 'male pattern baldness' --

Re: testing apache 1.3 on windows

2004-03-15 Thread Randy Kobes
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: also, there apparently is no longer an apxs.pl for 2.0 windows -- so what's the magic Makefile.PL argument to let the test modules be built? There is an alpha port of apxs for Win32 for Apache/2.0; grab the script

Re: testing apache 1.3 on windows

2004-03-15 Thread Randy Kobes
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: At 02:51 PM 3/15/2004, you wrote: On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: also, there apparently is no longer an apxs.pl for 2.0 windows -- so what's the magic Makefile.PL argument to let the test modules be built? There is