Re: apr_psprintf thread safe?

2004-01-09 Thread Cliff Woolley
Where does it say that? httpd uses it extensively, so if it's not, I'd tend to think we'd have noticed by now... --Cliff On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Donald Doane wrote: > Okay, will do that, but it's called in > "flood_easy_reports::easy_process_stats()" and it seems APR > documentation implies it is

Re: apr_psprintf thread safe?

2004-01-09 Thread Donald Doane
The following comment is from apr_lib.h: * apr_vformatter does not call out to any other code, it is entirely * self-contained. This allows the callers to do things which are * otherwise "unsafe". For example, apr_psprintf uses the "scratch" * space at the unallocated end of a block, and doesn't

Re: apr_psprintf thread safe?

2004-01-09 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Donald Doane wrote: > The following comment is from apr_lib.h: > > * apr_vformatter does not call out to any other code, it is entirely > * self-contained. This allows the callers to do things which are > * otherwise "unsafe". For example, apr_psprintf uses the "scratch" >

Re: apr_psprintf thread safe?

2004-01-09 Thread Sander Striker
On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 04:50, Cliff Woolley wrote: [...] > That seems to say to me that apr_psprintf is in fact threadsafe after all. > :-) It actually depends on how apr_psprintf is called, pass it the same pool in two concurrent threads and it might blow up. Is the apr_psprintf function otherwi

Re: apr_psprintf thread safe?

2004-01-09 Thread Donald Doane
Thank you for the claification. Sander Striker wrote: On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 04:50, Cliff Woolley wrote: [...] That seems to say to me that apr_psprintf is in fact threadsafe after all. :-) It actually depends on how apr_psprintf is called, pass it the same pool in two concurrent threads and

Re: Regarding Apache 2.0.48 and specweb99

2004-01-09 Thread gregames
Joshua Schnee wrote: I am attempting to set up the latest Apache server and RHEL 64bit to use in a Specweb99 run and am running into cgi issues. I am very new to Apache, and am having difficulty getting apache to run/use/find my cgi-script. Static content works fine, but I am getting improper

Re: Regarding Apache 2.0.48 and specweb99

2004-01-09 Thread Sander Temme
> the various types of URLs. Fortunately, the client prints the URLs before it > tests them. Cut-n-paste the failing URLs into a browser navigation bar and > hit > enter. What does the browser display? Even better, the manager script dumps the result of its tests to files with names like 'dync

Re: Perl test framework, TestConfig, and debugging A::T

2004-01-09 Thread William McKee
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 12:57:43PM -0800, Stas Bekman wrote: > It's really hard to guess what did you do. As suggested below if you could > create a sample package which reproduces the problem, upload it somewhere > and post the URL here, we could be much more helpful. You should be able to > cr

Re: sticky preferences in Apache-Test

2004-01-09 Thread Geoffrey Young
>> >> $ perl Makefile.PL MP_APXS=/apache/2.1/prefork/perl-5.8.2/bin/apxs >> ... >> Configuring Apache/2.1.0-dev mod_perl/1.99_13-dev Perl/v5.8.2 >> >> $ make && make test >> ... >> using Apache/2.0.49-dev (prefork MPM) >> >> waiting 120 seconds for server to start: .httpd: module "mod_perl.c" >> i

Re: sticky preferences in Apache-Test

2004-01-09 Thread Stas Bekman
Geoffrey Young wrote: $ perl Makefile.PL MP_APXS=/apache/2.1/prefork/perl-5.8.2/bin/apxs ... Configuring Apache/2.1.0-dev mod_perl/1.99_13-dev Perl/v5.8.2 $ make && make test ... using Apache/2.0.49-dev (prefork MPM) waiting 120 seconds for server to start: .httpd: module "mod_perl.c" is not compat

Re: Perl test framework, TestConfig, and debugging A::T

2004-01-09 Thread Stas Bekman
William McKee wrote: [...] I've been calling it as `perl -d t/TEST`. I have tried calling it using `t/TEST -debug perl` but the debugger hangs or, more recently, I get the message '!!! server is not ready yet, try again.' Running the tests without debugging or with the gdb debugger works fine. I ne