Re: GET() w/o redirection

2003-06-18 Thread Geoffrey Young
I finally figured out that this works: $Apache::TestRequest::RedirectOK = 0; Again, more docs would be welcome. well, it's not more docs, but whenever I'm in search of some bit of functionality I check the tests in the perl-framework/t/modules directory, which you'll find if you checkout the

Re: Perl Testing

2003-06-18 Thread Stas Bekman
Geoffrey Young wrote: 1. The documentation is pretty lacking. As Geoff pointed out, this statement is incorrect. The document: http://perl.apache.org/docs/general/testing/testing.html should answer most of your questions. 2. The tests are being run from t/, rather then from the root of the

Re: resolving Apache::Test vs. Apache::test collision

2003-06-18 Thread Randy Kobes
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Stas Bekman wrote: [ .. ] David, please test this patch. This version performs the cleanup only during 'make install'. what I'm not sure about is whether it handles correctly some weird paths when creating the packlist. I think it should work, since nothing is passed via

[RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache::Test 1.03-dev

2003-06-18 Thread Stas Bekman
I've uploaded 1.03's release candidate. If nobody finds any faults, I'll upload it tomorrow on CPAN. (libapreq needs to rely on 1.03 fixes to release its 1.2's version). Please try it out: http://www.apache.org/~stas/Apache-Test-1.03-dev.tar.gz Test it with mod_perl 1.0: perl Makefile.PL -httpd

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache::Test 1.03-dev

2003-06-18 Thread Steve Hay
Stas Bekman wrote: I've uploaded 1.03's release candidate. If nobody finds any faults, I'll upload it tomorrow on CPAN. (libapreq needs to rely on 1.03 fixes to release its 1.2's version). Please try it out: http://www.apache.org/~stas/Apache-Test-1.03-dev.tar.gz Tests OK for me - Windows XP /

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache::Test 1.03-dev

2003-06-18 Thread Sergey V. Stashinskas
Hi, 5.0-RELEASE FreeBSD, apache 1.3.27, mod_perl 1.27, perl 5.8.0 All tests successful. -Original Message- From: Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: modperl@perl.apache.org,httpd-test-dev list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 19:13:46 +1000 Subject: [RELEASE CANDIDATE]

Re: resolving Apache::Test vs. Apache::test collision

2003-06-18 Thread Stas Bekman
Now just awaiting a confirmation from David and I'll put Apache::Test 1.03 on CPAN. David, if you see this before tomorrow, simpy try the latest cvs, I have already committed the needed change. Hopefully it does do the right thing for you.

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache::Test 1.03-dev

2003-06-18 Thread David Wheeler
On Wednesday, June 18, 2003, at 05:13 AM, Stas Bekman wrote: I've uploaded 1.03's release candidate. If nobody finds any faults, I'll upload it tomorrow on CPAN. (libapreq needs to rely on 1.03 fixes to release its 1.2's version). Please try it out:

Re: Perl Testing

2003-06-18 Thread David Wheeler
On Tuesday, June 17, 2003, at 08:02 PM, Stas Bekman wrote: Geoffrey Young wrote: 1. The documentation is pretty lacking. As Geoff pointed out, this statement is incorrect. The document: http://perl.apache.org/docs/general/testing/testing.html should answer most of your questions. It's incorrect

Re: GET() w/o redirection

2003-06-18 Thread David Wheeler
On Tuesday, June 17, 2003, at 08:04 PM, Stas Bekman wrote: I finally figured out that this works: $Apache::TestRequest::RedirectOK = 0; Again, more docs would be welcome. Patches are welcome. Glad to hear it! Look for one shortly. David -- David Wheeler AIM:

Re: resolving Apache::Test vs. Apache::test collision

2003-06-18 Thread David Wheeler
On Wednesday, June 18, 2003, at 07:30 AM, Stas Bekman wrote: Now just awaiting a confirmation from David and I'll put Apache::Test 1.03 on CPAN. David, if you see this before tomorrow, simpy try the latest cvs, I have already committed the needed change. Hopefully it does do the right thing

Re: GET() w/o redirection

2003-06-18 Thread David Wheeler
On Tuesday, June 17, 2003, at 07:22 PM, Geoffrey Young wrote: I finally figured out that this works: $Apache::TestRequest::RedirectOK = 0; Again, more docs would be welcome. well, it's not more docs, but whenever I'm in search of some bit of functionality I check the tests in the