Re: [NOTICE] Subversion conversion

2004-11-15 Thread Philippe M. Chiasson
Stas Bekman wrote: Geoffrey Young wrote: [...] so, rock on svn. yes, yes, I'm +1. Thanks for taking care of it. Don't forget about preserving the frozen cvs though. I have lots of modified files all over. Yah, the CVS repository will remain for a long time read-only. (don't exactly know what

Re: [NOTICE] Subversion conversion

2004-11-14 Thread Yoshiki Hayashi
[Hope moderators won't discard this mail to lists that I'm not subscribed to] Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm finally taking care of the conversion of httpd-* to SVN. I'll follow up with instructions on how to pull new workingcopies, etc etc. I'm looking for volunteers to

Re: [NOTICE] Subversion conversion

2004-11-14 Thread Stas Bekman
Geoffrey Young wrote: Sander Striker wrote: Hi, I'm finally taking care of the conversion of httpd-* to SVN. I'll follow up with instructions on how to pull new workingcopies, etc etc. I'm looking for volunteers to actually write a page for developers on where to get SVN and how to check out the

Re: [NOTICE] Subversion conversion

2004-11-14 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 03:29:07PM -0500, Stas Bekman wrote: It's just that someone needs to simultaneously move modperl-2.0 to subversion too. And modperl-docs too, since they are checked out into There's no reason we can't do the mp conversion today as well. Stop by at the Hackathon and we

Re: [NOTICE] Subversion conversion

2004-11-14 Thread Stas Bekman
Justin Erenkrantz wrote: On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 03:29:07PM -0500, Stas Bekman wrote: It's just that someone needs to simultaneously move modperl-2.0 to subversion too. And modperl-docs too, since they are checked out into There's no reason we can't do the mp conversion today as well. Stop by