Re: [PATCH] add ldd/otool output to bug reports

2005-09-12 Thread Randy Kobes
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: If this point was reached, it would break Win32, plus any other system which didn't have an ldd in the PATH. Perhaps Apache::TestConfig::which() could be used to see if an ldd() [or otool()] is present, and skip this part if it's not found? I

Re: [PATCH] add ldd/otool output to bug reports

2005-09-11 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
If this point was reached, it would break Win32, plus any other system which didn't have an ldd in the PATH. Perhaps Apache::TestConfig::which() could be used to see if an ldd() [or otool()] is present, and skip this part if it's not found? I guess qx{} is different on win32 ? Take from example

Re: [PATCH] add ldd/otool output to bug reports

2005-09-09 Thread Randy Kobes
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: For both mp2bug and A-T Question, why does A-T call it OSX and mp2 call it DARWIN ... should we sync one way or the other ? Index: lib/ModPerl/Config.pm === ---