Re: listings.sty is missing?

2003-03-15 Thread Staszek Wawrykiewicz
to the proper location. One bad Thomas' keystroke should be no more mentioned. -- Staszek Wawrykiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: teTeX-2.0.2 and the listings package?

2003-03-12 Thread Staszek Wawrykiewicz
hash. When texmf/source/ tree is missing, download listings from CTAN and run latex listings.ins, then copy listings.sty as above. -- Staszek Wawrykiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ANN: teTeX-2.0.2

2003-03-03 Thread Staszek Wawrykiewicz
As for tetex-2.0.2 * remove g-brief: it is not free software it would be also wise to remove from texmf/texdoctk/texdoctk.dat: g-brief;Alternative german letter style (g-brief);latex/g-brief/g-brief.dvi; (2 occurences), thought German friends could be unhappy... -- Staszek Wawrykiewicz

Re: europs.sty in 2.0(.1)

2003-02-22 Thread Staszek Wawrykiewicz
s the euro glyph in 128 dec for times, helvetica, courier, bookman like fonts, compatible for those provided by URW++. As those fonts are also GPL licensed, anybody can feel free to adapt them to make "just work" as you would like. -- Staszek Wawrykiewicz email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Quick question regarding -src-specials

2002-12-01 Thread Staszek Wawrykiewicz
with a web2c-version that ends up with "x", > 7.3.7x I think. As concerned TL7, it is still: This is TeX, Version 3.14159 (Web2C 7.3.7x) I think it is intentionally, so we have the same binaries for all (GUST, TUG, DANTE, TUG2002, CSTUG CD TeX Live 7 releases). -- Staszek Wawrykiewicz email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Font problem or not?

2002-11-26 Thread Staszek Wawrykiewicz
26 Nov 2002 Reinhard Kotucha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Staszek Wawrykiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > It seems somehow strange. Why both map files differ? As I > > understand the whole mechanism, different map files for dvips > > and pdftex are only

Re: Font problem or not?

2002-10-30 Thread Staszek Wawrykiewicz
7;t tell from the TeX source what fonts are > really being used. It is not TeX problem but final output/device dependent. For TeX we use only .tfm files. If (for some reason) we have two different map files, we can always declare them in config.ps and pdftex.cfg, respectively (p +mymap.map). --

Re: [tex-live] Xdvi binaries

2002-05-20 Thread Staszek Wawrykiewicz
gt; > Find a system with a static version of libXaw, then we can use that > system to build a binary which no longer depends on the shared libXaw. > > Thomas Many thanks, Thomas. Such a brave member of DANTE and GUST ;-) I didn't expected that you're still on line (5:

Xdvi binaries

2002-05-20 Thread Staszek Wawrykiewicz
tributions, like Debian, etc., so any help or hint would be appreciated urgently. -- Staszek Wawrykiewicz email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: TeX/LaTeX Fonts

2001-12-18 Thread Staszek Wawrykiewicz
bsr.map uncomment that line to use Type1 version of standard CM fonts. > Already got anti-aliasing going. It looks like it's using PK and not PS > fonts despite being advised to say: > % blah blah > \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} Bad advice. T1 means using EC font which we have only b

xdvi20.40d bug

2001-10-13 Thread Staszek Wawrykiewicz
heavy to catch this bug? What about just using psfonts.map for xdvi? Since the new bahaviour of xdvi is not yet documented (I mean xdvi.cfg and special map files), the most users are now somehow confused. Kind regards, -- Staszek Wawrykiewicz email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [OffTopic] Curious to know whether latex2html is current?

2001-07-25 Thread Staszek Wawrykiewicz
oblems? I have only observed that latex2html (the same version!) is still mirrored on CTAN everyday ;-} -- Staszek Wawrykiewicz email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ec - fonts

2000-10-24 Thread Staszek Wawrykiewicz
will be made on-the-fly from _parameter_ file ecrm.mf). You would better running latex file to make EC fonts automagically: \documentclass{article} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} % switch to EC fonts \begin{document} some text \em{some more} {\bf etc.} \end{document} Staszek Wawrykiewicz email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: teTeX 1.0 vs. 0.4

2000-05-30 Thread Staszek Wawrykiewicz
atex from texmf.cnf. Joao Palhoto Matos wrote: > Please read the documentation for graphicx. This matter is unrelated to > teTeX proper. This matter *is related* to teTeX proper. ;-) Somehow more then reading the documentation for graphicx. Staszek Wawrykiewicz email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: teTeX 1.0 vs. 0.4

2000-05-19 Thread Staszek Wawrykiewicz
heck your ./texmf/tex/generic/dvips/ It should be there... or you forgot to rebuild ls-R databases: run texhash Staszek Wawrykiewicz email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

texmf.cnf for BLU

2000-03-10 Thread Staszek Wawrykiewicz
g/psfonts.map). The last question: if pdf* do not use psfonts.map from the dvips/config/ (or it use it as the last resort) why it use the same file name? Some time ago it used pdftex.map and it was enought clear... I remember Thomas' work with updmap. Perhaps old ideas are not so bad... S

Re: did anybody istall TIPA under teTeX-1.0.6 ?

1999-12-06 Thread Staszek Wawrykiewicz
On Sun, 5 Dec 1999, Ilia Chipitsine wrote: > if so - HOW DID YOU DO THAT ?? 1. Adapt Makefile from tipa package as on CTAN to the TDS conventions used in teTeX, or 2. much better, make some new directories in yor texmf tree and copy the files, e.g., as follows: TETEX=/usr/share/texmf