On Thursday, November 16, 2006 at 1:17:55 PM, David Allsopp wrote:
> The MiKTeX Repository package for MusiXTeX (2.5 or 2.4) still doesn't
> include musixflx.exe making it essentially broken. I too am still waiting
> for MiKTeX 2.5 to become a little more stable before updating (so sticking
> with
fonts.
HTH,
David
-Original Message-
From: Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 13:17:49 +0100
To: tex-music@icking-music-archive.org
Subject: Re: [TeX-music] Latest MikTeX versions for MusixTeX purposes?
One answer is that it doesn't matter, since MikTeX wi
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006, Eva-Raphaela Jaksch wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm in the process of setting up a new computer (Windows XP) and have
reached the point where I need to reinstall MikTeX. The problem is
that it's been so long since I used any TeX-related tools that I am
completely out of the loop
One answer is that it doesn't matter, since MikTeX will automatically
download and install a needed package if it isn't already installed.
/Mats
Eva-Raphaela Jaksch wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm in the process of setting up a new computer (Windows XP) and have
reached the point where I need to
Hello everyone,
I'm in the process of setting up a new computer (Windows XP) and have
reached the point where I need to reinstall MikTeX. The problem is
that it's been so long since I used any TeX-related tools that I am
completely out of the loop as regards what to install for MusixTeX
purposes.
5 matches
Mail list logo