Op So. 19 Mei 2019 om 13:16 het Hiroaki MORIMOTO geskryf:
>
> Thank you Dirk; that's great!
>
> I made a small, easy and quick test with C version musixflx 0.83.2.
>
> Replacing
>
> if ((x-eff_linewidth)<(lastbar/2)){
>
> into
>
> if ((x-eff_linewidth)<(lastbar/1.2)){
>
> eliminates th
Subject: Re: [Tex-music] Another one for the TeXperts
>
>
> Op So. 19 Mei 2019 om 10:56 het Hiroaki MORIMOTO geskryf:
> >
> > Thank you Don.
> > I think this is a problem on musixflx.
> >
> > Unfortunately, I do not have enough knowledge about musixflx
>|Would you be willing to provide me with a trial
>|executable with the changes you're suggesting? I'm
>|wondering if it will still fail my test if I use \xbar.
>|If it does, I would consider revising PMX to take
>|advantage of the enhancement. If we could find someone
>|who knows lua and is
Op So. 19 Mei 2019 om 10:56 het Hiroaki MORIMOTO geskryf:
>
> Thank you Don.
> I think this is a problem on musixflx.
>
> Unfortunately, I do not have enough knowledge about musixflx yet.
> All I did in this morning is to search the string "error_exit(2)"
> and to trace "if-then-else-endif" statem
t; To: "'Werner Icking Music Archive'"
> Date: Sat, 18 May 2019 23:01:21 -0700
> Subject: Re: [Tex-music] Another one for the TeXperts
>
>
> Thanks very much, Hiroaki, for looking into this. Unfortunately I'm not
> familiar with either lua or C. I sim
; To: Werner Icking Music Archive
> Subject: Re: [Tex-music] Another one for the TeXperts
>
> The of this error may be:
>
> if ((x-eff_linewidth) < (lastbar/2)) then
>
> at line 850 and
>
> else
> barsinline=i-1-mark
> if (barsinline < 1)
rchive) line
720 and line 790-793, because I'm not familiar with lua.
Hiroaki
- Original Message -
> From: "Don Simons"
> To: "'Werner Icking Music Archive'"
> Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 14:35:37 -0700
> Subject: Re: [Tex-music] Another on
I wrote
>...
> This suggests that PMX could produce short, right-justified codas on lines
of
> their own, using "Mi", if for that line only PMX used \bar rather than
\xbar.
> But unfortunately, aside from allowing possible unintended line breaks in
the
> coda, that still wouldn't admit single-bar
Bob Tennent wrote
>...
> The following works for me:
>
> =
>
> \input musixtex
> \hsize=524pt
> \vsize740pt
> \def\nbinstruments{1}
> \setstaffs11
> \setclef10
> \generalmeter{\meterfrac{4}{4}}%
> \nostartrule
> \startmuflex
> \parindent 256pt
> \startpiece\a
>|>
>|> The error message says
>|>
>|> Don't stress \mulooseness too much !!!
>|>
>|> This shouldn't happen ! Too few bars or \mulooseness too large ?
>|>
>|> But there's no problem if you avoid musixflx.
>|>
>|> >|And is there any way to allow \parindent > 253pt?
>|>
>|> You'd hav
Bob Tennent wrote
...
>
> The error message says
>
> Don't stress \mulooseness too much !!!
>
> This shouldn't happen ! Too few bars or \mulooseness too large ?
>
> But there's no problem if you avoid musixflx.
>
> >|And is there any way to allow \parindent > 253pt?
>
> You'd have to loo
>|
>| >|And is there any way to allow \parindent > 253pt?
More than one bar?
---
TeX-music@tug.org mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
https://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
>|For me, this file works OK:
>|
>|===
>|
>|\input musixtex
>|\hsize=524pt
>|\vsize740pt
>|\def\nbinstruments{1}
>|\setstaffs11
>|\setclef10
>|\generalmeter{\meterfrac{4}{4}}%
>|\nostartrule
>|\startmuflex
>|\parindent 253pt
>|\startpiece\addspace\afterruleski
For me, this file works OK:
===
\input musixtex
\hsize=524pt
\vsize740pt
\def\nbinstruments{1}
\setstaffs11
\setclef10
\generalmeter{\meterfrac{4}{4}}%
\nostartrule
\startmuflex
\parindent 253pt
\startpiece\addspace\afterruleskip%
\notes\wh c\en%
\Endpiece
14 matches
Mail list logo
