Re: [Tex-music] Compiling mtxdoc in Windows (was RE: Compile error in M-Tx documentation)

2011-05-04 Thread Bob Tennent
>|make (or derivatives) is the only logical system to use for the build >|system of code-based projects - the difference between make and a >|shell script is that make only rebuilds files which need to be rebuilt >|(so, for example, if you changed mtxdoc.tex, Dirk's Makefile would >|not rebuil

Re: [Tex-music] Compiling mtxdoc in Windows (was RE: Compile error in M-Tx documentation)

2011-05-04 Thread Dirk Laurie
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 02:44:07AM +0200, Bob Tennent wrote: > > But you might want to ask Dirk why he set it up the way he did. Back in 2005 I couldn't think of a better way to do it. The best way to see how dated the stuff is, is to notice that there is still a rule for making a LaserJet versi

Re: [Tex-music] Compiling mtxdoc in Windows (was RE: Compile error in M-Tx documentation)

2011-05-04 Thread David Allsopp
Bob Tennent wrote: > >|>... I wouldn't think that Windows users would >|>have any interest > in constructing mtxdoc.pdf from scratch. > >| > >|I've been responsible for creating extensive revisions of musixdoc, > >|which is >|a more complex document than mtxdoc, and I did all the work > in >|

Re: [Tex-music] Compiling mtxdoc in Windows (was RE: Compile error in M-Tx documentation)

2011-05-03 Thread Bob Tennent
>|>... I wouldn't think that Windows users would >|>have any interest in constructing mtxdoc.pdf from scratch. >| >|I've been responsible for creating extensive revisions of musixdoc, >|which is >|a more complex document than mtxdoc, and I did all the work in >|Windows. So I >|have more tha

Re: [Tex-music] Compiling mtxdoc in Windows (was RE: Compile error in M-Tx documentation)

2011-05-03 Thread Don Simons
Bob Tennent wrote >... I wouldn't think that Windows users would >have any interest in constructing mtxdoc.pdf from scratch. I've been responsible for creating extensive revisions of musixdoc, which is a more complex document than mtxdoc, and I did all the work in Windows. So I have more than a

Re: [Tex-music] Compiling mtxdoc in Windows (was RE: Compile error in M-Tx documentation)

2011-05-03 Thread Dirk Laurie
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 12:39:44PM +0200, Bob Tennent wrote: > > Dirk: Shouldn't you be following your own advice? Re-write the Makefile > in Lua (and only use tools available on every platform)! > It's on my TODO list, but not at this moment very high up. Dirk ---

Re: [Tex-music] Compiling mtxdoc in Windows (was RE: Compile error in M-Tx documentation)

2011-05-03 Thread Bob Tennent
>|(Lack of) progress report: >| >|1. In a Windows command window, I've succeeded in creating *.tex for >|all of >|the *.mtx, using only commands starting with >| >|"for %a in (*." >| >|In the process I figured out how to pass only the basenames of all >|*.pmx to >|musixflx with >| >|"f

Re: [Tex-music] Compiling mtxdoc in Windows (was RE: Compile error in M-Tx documentation)

2011-05-03 Thread David Allsopp
Don Simons wrote: > At that point it transitioned from adventure to slog, and I threw in the > towel, leaving the keys to this forbidden kingdom to the Unix gurus for > the time being. Quick translation of the Makefile (I haven't tested it) > make dvitarget The effect of this statement is to cau

[Tex-music] Compiling mtxdoc in Windows (was RE: Compile error in M-Tx documentation)

2011-05-03 Thread Don Simons
(Lack of) progress report: 1. In a Windows command window, I've succeeded in creating *.tex for all of the *.mtx, using only commands starting with "for %a in (*." In the process I figured out how to pass only the basenames of all *.pmx to musixflx with "for %a in (*.pmx) do musixflx %~na" 2.