On Mon, 18 Jul 2011, Don Simons wrote:
Can anyone explain why the following file, processed with PMX 2.614 causes
an underfull box warning and leaves too much space after the signatures in
the 3rd system (bar 17)? The syntax is exactly the same at the start of the
second system (bar 9), but
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 20:30 -0700, Don Simons wrote:
Can anyone explain why the following file, (snip)
Lacking the knowledge to do anything *really* helpful, I did my
routine chop chop exercise on the generated tex source. I append a
reduced source file that still shows more leading space on
Jean-Pierre Coulon said
Off-topic: the engraving standard is to put a downwards stem to notes on
the 3rd
line
According to Read, that's sort of true, On p. 64, he says When the note is
... on the third line ..., the stem may go in either direction, although it
is the more common practice to draw
Terrence Enger wrote
I find it interesting that the issue persists even at normal musicsize.
I don't see it. When I remove the \setsize commands, the underfull box warning
goes away. Some might argue that PMX's default spacing between the signature or
meter and the next note is sometimes too
Can anyone explain why the following file, processed with PMX 2.614 causes
an underfull box warning and leaves too much space after the signatures in
the 3rd system (bar 17)? The syntax is exactly the same at the start of the
second system (bar 9), but there the space is OK. Could it be somehow
5 matches
Mail list logo