A lot of the fun/pain of digital photography for many people is
interface dominated. The same is true for film cameras with
computerized controls. If the interface of that really nice camera
doesn't jive with the way you think, or controls you use all the time
are buried in layers of menues
] Digital (cave) Photography
All of my TCR images were taken with a $450 Canon SD850 that fits in my
pocket. I can't imagine what I could do if I had the money to spend on
a digital camera that actually had parts.
Gregg
Scott,
Check out dpreview.com and robgalbraith.com. www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos40d/page23.asp
* Canon has less sensor noise at high ISO.
* Canon has more IS, image stabilized, lenses available.
* Canon has more of the big glass. Witness how many white lenses are on the cameras at sporting
I'd like to throw my opinion in on this subject -
I think low sensor noise is even MORE important than density. (i.e. high
number of pixels)
It seems to be frequently left out of specifications and 8 megapixels ain't
jack if they're noisy!
I have a reasonable Leica lensed Panasonic camera which
Since the current topic is (Cave) Photography
I'm finally upgrading/updating my camera setup from film to digital.
I've used Canon/Pentax/Nikon 35mm SLR gear for many years...and I'm in the
middle of the learning curve about Digital SLR cameras.
I've almost decided on the Nikon D200.
.
Louise
List-Post: texascavers@texascavers.com
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:03:25 -0800From: csnicholson@sbcglobal.netTo:
texascavers@texascavers.comSubject: [Texascavers] Digital (cave) Photography
Since the current topic is (Cave) Photography
I'm finally upgrading/updating my
