Re: [Texascavers] Canon has less sensor noise at higher ISO Re: [Texascavers] Digital (cave) Photography

2007-11-15 Thread Don Cooper
I'd like to throw my opinion in on this subject - I think low sensor noise is even MORE important than density. (i.e. high number of pixels) It seems to be frequently left out of specifications and 8 megapixels ain't jack if they're noisy! I have a reasonable Leica lensed Panasonic camera which ta

[Texascavers] Canon has less sensor noise at higher ISO Re: [Texascavers] Digital (cave) Photography

2007-11-15 Thread Nigel Dyson-Hudson
Scott,   Check out dpreview.com and robgalbraith.com. www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos40d/page23.asp * Canon has less sensor noise at high ISO. * Canon has more IS, image stabilized, lenses available. * Canon has more of the big glass. Witness how many white lenses are on the cameras at sporting e

RE: [Texascavers] Digital (cave) Photography

2007-11-15 Thread mark . alman
exascavers] Digital (cave) Photography All of my TCR images were taken with a $450 Canon SD850 that fits in my pocket. I can't imagine what I could do if I had the money to spend on a digital camera that actually had parts. Gregg

Re: [Texascavers] Digital (cave) Photography

2007-11-15 Thread Gregg
A lot of the fun/pain of digital photography for many people is interface dominated. The same is true for film cameras with computerized controls. If the interface of that really nice camera doesn't jive with the way you think, or controls you use all the time are buried in layers of menues t

RE: [Texascavers] Digital (cave) Photography

2007-11-14 Thread Louise Power
Last summer I bought myself a Canon PowerShot A630. Don't know how it is in caves since I don't cave any more, but it's great for outdoor and indoor shots and has a lot of bells and whistles which will take me some time to, if not master, at least get the hang of. Cost on sale less than $300.