> Maybe a new statistics option is desirable;
>
> *statistics *, with the default [off] matching
> the current behaviour
Or a new value for topo-length, such as:
statistics topo-length all
But yes, your suggestion covers a few other cases, such as making sure
it is also included in carto statist
Oops, a mistake in the previous post. Should be…
Maybe a new statistics option is desirable;
statistics , with the default [off] matching the current
behaviour
___
Therion mailing list
Therion@speleo.sk
https://mailman.speleo.sk/listinfo/therion
>(I also switched to using a new centreline when the team changes - this is a
>pain though, because it means any calibration, copyright, date, authorship,
>etc. also has to be repeated. It would be so much easier for it to respect
>group.)
It is a pain, but it is something I have got used to
Hi Bruce,
> To see what Therion is interpreting from your input, cave-list and
> survey-list are a good compliment to the map output statistics.
Indeed - this is what made me realise I was probably doing it the wrong
way for Therion to understand. It is definitely a pain having to split
up surve
Wilton-Jones via Therion
> Date: 19/04/19 06:33 (GMT+12:00)
> To: therion@speleo.sk
> Cc: Tarquin Wilton-Jones
> Subject: [Therion] How to get the right count for cave lengths
>
> Hi,
>
> I have nearly completed the total survey for the system I am mapping. In
> total, the
: Tarquin Wilton-Jones via Therion
Date: 19/04/19 06:33 (GMT+12:00) To: therion@speleo.sk
Cc: Tarquin Wilton-Jones Subject: [Therion]
How to get the right count for cave lengths Hi,I have nearly completed the
total survey for the system I am mapping. Intotal, there are a series of little
caves
Hi,
I have nearly completed the total survey for the system I am mapping. In
total, there are a series of little caves (actually mines, but I will
stick with the word "caves" because it is clearer), a blind surface
shaft, and a couple of significantly long caves. In total, these were
surveyed over
