On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 20:32:02 +0100, Benedikt Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stefan Stuhr wrote:
>>>I completely agree with you. IMHO deleted files from removable media
>>>should go to users home trash can, since if the user deleted it for
>>>mistake, its possible to recover, it, but it doesn
Stefan Stuhr wrote:
> If Thunar only will support ~/.Trash/ as trash folder, then the trash
> shouldn't be used for files on removable media. Besides that, ~/.Trash/
> is definitely better than no trash at all.
I keep hearing that -- but I don't believe it. A broken trash
implementation is just g
i dont know if this has been talked about before, but here it goes. is
there going to be samba support/intergration in thunar for 1.0? or
will this be pushed back to 1.5, or 2.0? right now the only reason i
have nautilus still installed is for samba, and im eager to get rid of
it.
--
If it moves,
how about also remembering the users choices? if i press delete, its
nice of thunar to warn me, but yes, i really want to delete that file.
and also i do want everything going to ~/.trash, even if its on my usb
stick, so i can find it later, and not have to hunt through
/root/.trash or something fo
On 2/21/06, Stefan Stuhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> tir, 21 02 2006 kl. 16:20 -0300, skrev Rodrigo Coacci:
> > I completely agree with you. IMHO deleted files from removable media
> > should go to users home trash can, since if the user deleted it for
> > mistake, its possible to recover, it, but
Hello,
Here is a small advice on improving navigation in Thunar.
The problem (and how to reproduce it)
I go to /usr/doc where there are hundred of folders, I scroll down
enough to be sure the folder I'm going to open is down enough to
be out of the Thunar view if I scroll to the top of it
2006/2/21, Benedikt Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Roberto Pariset wrote:> Benny, would you please be so kind to inform translators a few days> before the next alpha release, when string freeze, just like last time?> Would be much appreciated...
Sure. I plan to release alpha2 in two weeks, but no prom
Brian J. Tarricone wrote:
> There should be an easy way from the GUI to switch between doing "trash"
> and "delete" on the fly. E.g., Windows Explorer trashes by default, but
> will delete if you hold down shift while performing the delete action
> (pressing delete key, selecting delete from the m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2/21/2006 11:11 AM, Benedikt Meurer wrote:
> Benedikt Meurer wrote:
>>> If Thunar only will support ~/.Trash/ as trash folder, then the trash
>>> shouldn't be used for files on removable media. Besides that, ~/.Trash/
>>> is definitely better than n
Roberto Pariset wrote:
> Benny, would you please be so kind to inform translators a few days
> before the next alpha release, when string freeze, just like last time?
> Would be much appreciated...
Sure. I plan to release alpha2 in two weeks, but no promises, my time is
very limited currently.
>
Stefan Stuhr wrote:
>>I completely agree with you. IMHO deleted files from removable media
>>should go to users home trash can, since if the user deleted it for
>>mistake, its possible to recover, it, but it doesn't occupy space on
>>the rem. media.
>
> But that may not be what users want, e.g. if
Benny, would you please be so kind to inform translators a few days before the next alpha release, when string freeze, just like last time? Would be much appreciated...Thanks,Roberto
___
Thunar-dev mailing list
Thunar-dev@xfce.org
http://foo-projects.org/
tir, 21 02 2006 kl. 16:20 -0300, skrev Rodrigo Coacci:
> I completely agree with you. IMHO deleted files from removable media
> should go to users home trash can, since if the user deleted it for
> mistake, its possible to recover, it, but it doesn't occupy space on
> the rem. media.
But that may
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006 20:04:12 +0100
Benedikt Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stefan Stuhr wrote:
> >
> > If Thunar only will support ~/.Trash/ as trash folder, then the
> > trash shouldn't be used for files on removable media. Besides that,
> > ~/.Trash/ is definitely better than no trash at a
I completely agree with you. IMHO deleted files from removable media
should go to users home trash can, since if the user deleted it for
mistake, its possible to recover, it, but it doesn't occupy space on
the rem. media.On 2/21/06, Benedikt Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Benedikt Meurer wrote:>
Benedikt Meurer wrote:
>>If Thunar only will support ~/.Trash/ as trash folder, then the trash
>>shouldn't be used for files on removable media. Besides that, ~/.Trash/
>>is definitely better than no trash at all.
BTW: I'm not a fan of this part of the trash-spec either. It makes sense
for most "n
Stefan Stuhr wrote:
>>A good implementation would just conform to the trash-spec. Since
>>that's
>>not possible in time, we'll stick to ~/.Trash/ for now. That's doable
>>in
>>time.
>
>
> I was referring to a good implementation of the not-so-good solution.
>
> If Thunar only will support ~/.Tra
tir, 21 02 2006 kl. 18:21 +0100, skrev Benedikt Meurer:
> A good implementation would just conform to the trash-spec. Since
> that's
> not possible in time, we'll stick to ~/.Trash/ for now. That's doable
> in
> time.
I was referring to a good implementation of the not-so-good solution.
If Thunar
Stefan Stuhr wrote:
>>I haven't checked the script, as I don't have much spare time ATM, but
>>support for ~/.Trash/ could be added to Thunar as well. That's pretty
>>easy. Implementing the trash-spec is way harder.
>>
>>So if people are happy with ~/.Trash/, I can add that to Thunar for Xfce
>>4.4
tir, 21 02 2006 kl. 13:37 +0100, skrev Benedikt Meurer:
> I haven't checked the script, as I don't have much spare time ATM, but
> support for ~/.Trash/ could be added to Thunar as well. That's pretty
> easy. Implementing the trash-spec is way harder.
>
> So if people are happy with ~/.Trash/, I c
Well IMHO, you should make ~/.Trash/ at least for version 1.0, and
maybe let the trash-spec for a future version of Thunar, once the
trash-spec gets more mature...
As Rast mentioned: better this trash than no trash...
By the way, I know this is not the right maillist, but anyone knows any expected
Stefan Stuhr wrote:
> Thunar doesn't have a trash like other file managers, and it doesn't
> seem like it will get one in time for Thunar 1.0 (I do hope that I'm
> wrong here). As I want to have a trash in my filemanager, I have
> developed a simple trash script - simpletrash.sh (shell script with
22 matches
Mail list logo
