On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 20:22:20 +0100, Tino Keitel wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 17:42:49 +0100, Harald Judt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Since thunar switched to udev, the "unmount" action has been
> > replaced with an "eject" action which unfortuna
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 17:42:49 +0100, Harald Judt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since thunar switched to udev, the "unmount" action has been
> replaced with an "eject" action which unfortunately removes the
> drive from the list in the left-pane menu.
>
> I do not want that; I want the USB flash drive in my
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 14:14:54 +0200, Jannis Pohlmann wrote:
> What you need to test these changes is the "jannis/port-to-udev"
> branch of Thunar and the branch with the same name of thunar-volman.
> Enjoy!
Does this work with xfce 4.6, or only with 4.7?
Regards,
Tino
___
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 21:02:40 +0200, v...@ukr.net wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:01:15 +0100
> Nick Schermer wrote:
> >
> > Stop hijacking threads on the ml, but report bugs or start a new thread.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Nick
>
> Ok. If the thing I wrote about is a different problem - here is
Hi,
sometimes I notice that a process called thunar-vfs-mime causes my hard
disk to spin up, according to the kernel log after
echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/block_dump:
<7>thunar-vfs-mime(8315): dirtied inode 3269093 (applications) on dm-5
<7>thunar-vfs-mime(8315): dirtied inode 3268654 (defaults.list.CE
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 13:17:50 +0100, Tino Keitel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sometimes I notice that a process called thunar-vfs-mime causes my hard
> disk to spin up, according to the kernel log after
> echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/block_dump:
>
> <7>thunar-vfs-mime(8315): dirti
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 16:35:51 +1000, Jonathan Hepburn wrote:
[...]
> Could someone please point me in approximately the right direction, if
> not just tell me the solution? Where is the ownership of removable
> devices decided?
I think to fix this, a few more defails are required. How exactly
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 18:48:43 +0200, Jelle de Jong wrote:
> Tino Keitel wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 10:25:12 +0200, Jelle de Jong wrote:
> >> Tino Keitel wrote:
> >>> Hi folks,
> >>>
> >>> I'd like to know how to apply a cust
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 10:25:12 +0200, Jelle de Jong wrote:
> Tino Keitel wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I'd like to know how to apply a custom action to multiple selected
> > files. In this case, I have photos from my camera, which need to be
> > rotated man
Hi folks,
I'd like to know how to apply a custom action to multiple selected
files. In this case, I have photos from my camera, which need to be
rotated manually if taken in portrait orientation (no builtin sensor).
I tried the custom actions, but they don't seem to work if more than
one file is s
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 22:12:01 +0200, Markus Hofstetter wrote:
[...]
> Is there a way to pass mountoptions depending on the filesystem or
> the HAL device UDI or something?
AFAIK thunar-volman (or rather exo) doesn't care for mount options
supplied by HAL. I don't know if this was fixed with t
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 20:22:18 +0200, Simon Steinbeiß wrote:
[...]
> Tried "sudo eject -v /dev/wdpassport" with the output that the eject
> succeeded. (see the
> full output here: http://pastebin.org/32834)
> Anyhow, when I unplugged the usb-cable (that is also powering the hdd) it
> made thi
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 17:23:08 +0200, Simon Steinbeiß wrote:
> > Oh, and the ouput of mount and your exact exo-eject command line
> > please.
>
> mount (/dev/wdpassport is set in my udev-rule):
> /dev/wdpassport on /media/WD Passport type vfat
> (rw,nosuid,nodev,uhelper=hal,utf8,shortname=winnt,
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 17:00:21 +0200, Tino Keitel wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 16:30:10 +0200, Simon Steinbeiß wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > As mentioned above, I do see the "eject" button. Anyways, I tried
> > "exo-eject" to see
> > whether thi
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 16:30:10 +0200, Simon Steinbeiß wrote:
[...]
> As mentioned above, I do see the "eject" button. Anyways, I tried "exo-eject"
> to see
> whether this would give me a more comprehensive error message, well here it
> is (the
> command I ran was "exo-eject
> -h SAME_AS_BELOW
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 15:33:11 +0200, Simon Steinbeiß wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I would like to implement the workaround that Kirill Belokurov wrote for KDE
> for this bug
> (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/117713) for thunar. Since this bug
> applies to
> only a very limited range of h
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 15:33:11 +0200, Simon Steinbeiß wrote:
[...]
> Anyways, I think that it could be sufficient as a workaround to:
> - either have a customised action in thunar only be applied to this specific
> drive and
> spinning it down
> - or trying to hack whatever function is used by
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 08:09:03 +0100, Christophe Chapuis wrote:
> Well, looks like I've partially found why my problem occurs...
> It looks like when I'm listing all the known volumes and ask for they
> mount path, it returns me pathes like "file:///media/sda1",
> "file:///media/sda2", ..., the v
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 12:16:50 -0500, Erik Harrison wrote:
> On Feb 17, 2008 6:37 AM, Erlend Davidson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hehe, high-performance and large images? It is possible to load and
> > > store thumbnails inside the EXIF data AFAIK. I imagine large JPEGs
> > > will someti
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 21:46:32 -0800, Linux Tard wrote:
> Hi! Currently using Thunar and the thunar vol manager
> in Xfce. When I attach USB drive the icon appears on
> desktop. I right click and have Open (which mounts
> and opens thunar to mount point) and Mount along with
> few other option
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 19:40:22 +0100, Tino Keitel wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 18:36:27 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 01:22:34PM +0000, Tino Keitel wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 09:36:04 +0100, Benedikt Meurer wrote:
> > >
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 18:36:27 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 01:22:34PM +0000, Tino Keitel wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 09:36:04 +0100, Benedikt Meurer wrote:
> > > Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > > >>> I can confirm that I hav
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 09:36:04 +0100, Benedikt Meurer wrote:
> Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> >>> I can confirm that I have no "Eject" button in the shortcuts pane
> >>> without the patch, and and "Eject" button with the patch.
> >> Committed. Bug Brian to fix xfdesktop as well.
> >
> > Are there pa
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 10:16:11 -0800, Brian J. Tarricone wrote:
[...]
> P.S. Also, what happens for the "Floppy Drive" icon? Sounds pretty
> confusing to have an "Eject" menu item that -- physically -- appears to
> do nothing (unless you're on an old Mac).
When your floppy device HAL entry
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 01:18:46 +0100, Tino Keitel wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 15:44:36 -0800, Brian J. Tarricone wrote:
> > Tino Keitel wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 20:31:34 +0100, Benedikt Meurer wrote:
> > >> Tino Keitel wrote:
> > >>>
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 01:18:46 +0100, Tino Keitel wrote:
> Done.
It's bug #3738.
___
Thunar-dev mailing list
Thunar-dev@xfce.org
http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 15:44:36 -0800, Brian J. Tarricone wrote:
> Tino Keitel wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 20:31:34 +0100, Benedikt Meurer wrote:
> >> Tino Keitel wrote:
> >>> I can confirm that I have no "Eject" button in the shortcuts pane
> &g
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 00:38:55 +0100, Tino Keitel wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 20:31:34 +0100, Benedikt Meurer wrote:
> > Tino Keitel wrote:
> > > I can confirm that I have no "Eject" button in the shortcuts pane
> > > without the patch,
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 20:31:34 +0100, Benedikt Meurer wrote:
> Tino Keitel wrote:
> > I can confirm that I have no "Eject" button in the shortcuts pane
> > without the patch, and and "Eject" button with the patch.
>
> Committed. Bug Brian to fix xfd
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 13:50:20 +0100, Benedikt Meurer wrote:
> Tino Keitel wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 09:29:24 +0100, Benedikt Meurer wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> Hm, there seems to be an error in thunar-shortcuts-view.c. The "Eject
> >&g
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 09:29:24 +0100, Benedikt Meurer wrote:
[...]
> Hm, there seems to be an error in thunar-shortcuts-view.c. The "Eject
> Volume" action is only added for discs. Try the attached patch.
While looking at the source, I wondered if the same patch is necessary
for thunar-tree-vi
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 09:29:24 +0100, Benedikt Meurer wrote:
[...]
> Hm, there seems to be an error in thunar-shortcuts-view.c. The "Eject
> Volume" action is only added for discs. Try the attached patch.
Thanks for the quick reply, I'll try the patch and report back.
Regards,
Tino
__
Hi,
the changelog for Thunar 0.9.0 mentions this:
---
Use the correct HAL property to determine whether a given volume or
device requires eject (Bug #3119).
---
As I wa
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 10:55:36 +, Erlend Davidson wrote:
[...]
> Wow - that's cool! Would it be possible to filter files by pattern too
> (I think this would be more useful).
I already thought about this, too. But no time to implement it, yet.
Regards,
Tino
_
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 15:49:57 -0700, Brian J. Tarricone wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 23:50:21 +0200 Stephan Arts wrote:
>
> > I just noticed my cellphone (the sony-ericsson walkman phone) can
> > detect whether or not it is mounted to the computer. And when it has
> > been ejected (using the ej
Hi,
one month ago I started to submit thunar related patches to
bugzilla.xfce.org (2856, 3038, 3466). I got no response for any of
them. Even if the developers think that the patches are totally crap
(some of them are merely intended as a quick fix, so that it works for
me), I'd like to get such a
36 matches
Mail list logo
