[tw] Re: [not TW] Review of some competitors (@dev)

2018-03-19 Thread iain
Really this video is a rather long winded and verbose comparison between three oranges and a lemon. The oranges seems to be citation managers and the lemon is Evernote which is in my view more likely a "competitor" to TW in that they are at heart databases of notes rather than citations. As I

Re: [tw] Re: [not TW] Review of some competitors (@dev)

2018-03-19 Thread 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki
In the generated text, what is the trick that makes <> macro work, despite their being no actual tag "MyLabeldocument", though there is a tag "MyLabel" ?? Thanks -- Mark On Sunday, March 18, 2018 at 3:00:07 AM UTC-7, BurningTreeC wrote: > > >> That’s a great little demo, and very useful, con

[tw] Re: [not TW] Review of some competitors (@dev)

2018-03-19 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
Whoa! You did it again! Can I suggest you create a new thread just for this ... J, x BurningTreeC wrote: > > > This *abcjs* library https://abcjs.net seems very interesting for writing >> sounds and having them played by web-midi >> > > See a demo here: http://musicsheets.tiddlyspot.com/ > > I'

[tw] Re: [not TW] Review of some competitors (@dev)

2018-03-19 Thread BurningTreeC
> @TiddlyTweeter > > This *abcjs* library https://abcjs.net seems very interesting for writing > sounds and having them played by web-midi > > I didn't know that something like soundfonts do even exist - they're > basically made like woff or truetype fonts > Can be saved within a tiddlywiki an

[tw] Re: [not TW] Review of some competitors (@dev)

2018-03-18 Thread BurningTreeC
@TiddlyTweeter This *abcjs* library https://abcjs.net seems very interesting for writing sounds and having them played by web-midi I didn't know that something like soundfonts do even exist - they're basically made like woff or truetype fonts Can be saved within a tiddlywiki and used by the ab

[tw] Re: [not TW] Review of some competitors (@dev)

2018-03-18 Thread BurningTreeC
@Jeremy The process for transforming document elements into tiddlers is now a > declarative JSON-based format that’s easy to hack What are the tiddlers to look for if one wants to hack it? BTC -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group.

[tw] Re: [not TW] Review of some competitors (@dev)

2018-03-18 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
BurningTreeC wrote: > > By the way, that remembers me of http://spritzinc.com/ > That is a neat idea of "modern reading". Well suited to miniscule screens. FWIW, I'd be very interested in converting novels to use that approach. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goo

[tw] Re: [not TW] Review of some competitors (@dev)

2018-03-18 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
BurningTreeC wrote: > > I was referring to notation of musical notes - musical scores - sheets of > virtual tiddlywiki paper with notes on it > Got it. IF that could be in a format that could also be fed to synthesiser so much the better. There has been quite a lot of wok along those lines. But

[tw] Re: [not TW] Review of some competitors (@dev)

2018-03-18 Thread BurningTreeC
By the way, that remembers me of http://spritzinc.com/ Which could be done within TW, too -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@g

Re: [tw] Re: [not TW] Review of some competitors (@dev)

2018-03-18 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
Jeremy, a footnote on this... > ... I sometimes worry that it’s quite unapproachable. >> > I do NOT find it unapproachable. I think its far more likely we don't have enough people who would use it who know it exists. Once you get into the area of bespoke importing to TW we talking about a far

[tw] Re: [not TW] Review of some competitors (@dev)

2018-03-18 Thread BurningTreeC
> BTC: Would this give a piano that could play? See your previous: > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/tiddlywiki/7IRkFw0Xb0c/zb-C-gyrCQAJ > > > yes, not within tiddlywiki but with a real piano player playing it in front of a tiddlywiki I was referring to notation of musical notes - musical sco

[tw] Re: [not TW] Review of some competitors (@dev)

2018-03-18 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
BTC: Would this give a piano that could play? See your previous: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/tiddlywiki/7IRkFw0Xb0c/zb-C-gyrCQAJ BurningTreeC wrote: > > If rendering music scores could be done or implemented, in combination > with the timer plugin tw would be an app for all the orchestras o

[tw] Re: [not TW] Review of some competitors (@dev)

2018-03-18 Thread BurningTreeC
If rendering music scores could be done or implemented, in combination with the timer plugin tw would be an app for all the orchestras out there Even annotation would be easy Could replace a whole bunch of mediocre software The timer plugin can switch pages or lines of the music-scores with the p

[tw] Re: [not TW] Review of some competitors (@dev)

2018-03-18 Thread BurningTreeC
I'm just adding two ideas here that should be possible with the text-slicer plugin: 1. There are music scores in XML format (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MusicXML) 2. Pdfs can be converted easily to html or xml (on linux / mac / windows 10 (linux subsystem) there's a commandline t

Re: [tw] Re: [not TW] Review of some competitors (@dev)

2018-03-18 Thread BurningTreeC
> > > That’s a great little demo, and very useful, congratulations. > > I’m delighted you’ve been able to dig into the text-slicer plugin; I > sometimes worry that it’s quite unapproachable. > Thank you Jeremy, About the Text-Slicer ... it's great, but it makes the impression "this is expert

Re: [tw] Re: [not TW] Review of some competitors (@dev)

2018-03-18 Thread Jeremy Ruston
Hi BurningTreeC > On 18 Mar 2018, at 09:05, BurningTreeC wrote: > > Hi all, I've made a demo where we can explore how the Text-Slicer can be used > for Drag-and-Drop Import > > http://textslicer-dragndrop.tiddlyspot.com/ > That’s a great little de

[tw] Re: [not TW] Review of some competitors (@dev)

2018-03-18 Thread BurningTreeC
Hi all, I've made a demo where we can explore how the *Text-Slicer *can be used for *Drag-and-Drop *Import http://textslicer-dragndrop.tiddlyspot.com/ I think it's pretty self-explanatory When you drop something that contains an image, it isn't shown because (I think that's a bug) it add a '/'

[tw] Re: [not TW] Review of some competitors (@dev)

2018-03-17 Thread Ste Wilson
Jan did some work on referencing and citations for tw. It's somewhere here... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups

[tw] Re: [not TW] Review of some competitors (@dev)

2018-03-17 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
Mark S. wrote: > > > TW does not have citation reporting abilities. Data would need to be > captured in a structured manner. Someone could write a special edition with > specialized fields that might make that available (though rules of citation > format are a real pain). > I have experience in

[tw] Re: [not TW] Review of some competitors (@dev)

2018-03-17 Thread 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki
I ran the video at 1.25 speed, so might have missed something. *Summary* The interest was mostly about gathering and publishing references for published texts, which is somewhat of a niche specialty. Three of the products were aimed at gathering references. The same 3 had advanced PDF handling

[tw] Re: [not TW] Review of some competitors (@dev)

2018-03-17 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
Ciao Mark S. & Mat Both Mark's comment and the video kinda clarified some of my thoughts on TW. I do have an ongoing concern about SCALABILITY. Yep. It runs in browser and there are limits. BUT I also think in order to be able to design well to use it to its best at scale one needs to unders

[tw] Re: [not TW] Review of some competitors (@dev)

2018-03-16 Thread 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki
The problem is images. After you use TiddlyClip to grab the basic text (and format it into TW ), you have to go back and save each image you want to keep. Then change the captured text to use your external files. There's still no quick way to create an external uri tiddler. In addition, indexed

[tw] Re: [not TW] Review of some competitors (@dev)

2018-03-15 Thread TonyM
Mat, I Note the following video on Citavi divides content into References, Knowledge (links into references) and Tasks. A Model I may look at rather than simply maintaining references. Thanks for sharing. Tony On Thursday, March 15, 2018 at 6:54:38 PM UTC+11, Mat wrote: > > Nice comparison be

[tw] Re: [not TW] Review of some competitors (@dev)

2018-03-15 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
Mat Its interesting to me in its focus on (1) site scraping; (2) how well the discussed programs organise and present the scraped data. The mechanism TW needs for that is part covered by TiddlyClip. I think if we can scrape the data in a well prepared form the rest would be a doddle in TW and