Thanks all, very interesting, I feel the older one may suit my requirements
better then, despite the new one looking very modern and swish!
On Friday, June 5, 2015 at 12:28:52 AM UTC+1, RichardWilliamSmith wrote:
Then use the old one.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
It is possible to use the old style wiki text in tw5 via the TW classic
wiki text plugin
http://tiddlywiki.com/plugins/tiddlywiki/tw2parser/
cheers
BJ
On Friday, June 5, 2015 at 10:36:16 AM UTC+1, Daniel Lawson wrote:
Thanks all, very interesting, I feel the older one may suit my
Then use the old one.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
TiddlyWiki group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
On Thursday, June 4, 2015 at 3:03:37 AM UTC-7, Daniel Lawson wrote:
...the text all forms on the same line despite there being carriage
returns.
TiddlyWiki Classic treated all newlines as literal characters and converted
them to br for rendering. While this produced a more WYSIWYG-like
I liked it the old way.
For your list, there are several work arounds.
You could put each item in a bullet:
* a
* b
You could put each item in a quote
a
b
You could switch the entire tiddler to classic format using the drop down
on the lower right of your tiddler.
You could put
There are several ways in which TW5 seems to be a step down from TWC. This
is one of them.
For your list, there are several work arounds.
You could put each item in a bullet:
* a
* b
You could put each item in a quote
a
b
You could switch the entire tiddler to classic format using
6 matches
Mail list logo